Quangasaurusrex

Lol I'm glad to be on the top!

-support Sorry, I have never seen you before

-support Not active

They probably did it because rockford is always at the maximum capacity for "storage". Hence why every rockford edit has stuff removed or changed. These places were probably not used much, so they found other uses for different places.

It wasn't a false hostage, other than the fact that one of us didn't put "hostage" in the advert. We (all) still adverted bank raid/assist. The kidnap was perfectly valid, although I adverted bank raid, I was not the one who started it. Also Calamity was perfectly fine with it, which is why he slayed Elapin after him running into the vault and shooting the hostage, then screaming down our ears about "YOU DIDNT ADVERT HOSTAGE x20". We still negotiated, and continued with the roleplay. Also this still doesn't negate what he did? He should have called staff if he wanted to complain.

This is correct, although punishments vary per department Him being searched without probable cause goes against the fourth amendment, unless consented to. In this case, there does not appear to be any consent. Him being outside does not give him probable cause to search him. Although circumstances vary, it appears this was not the correct way to go. see also: good faith | fourth amendment | Terry vs. Ohio

I don't see an issue with responding to your own app. He's trying to convince us why he should be a lieutenant, he can't exactly do that with allegations against him if he's not allowed to answer any concerns that people have against him.

You can still do it with cuffs, it just takes way longer. Also it shouldn't be our problem if their potatos can't handle it. I can't even not record without lagging in this server, and I have a great pc.

Your in game name: Monkey Your Steam ID: STEAM_1:1:155903311 The player's in game name: Colesoft The player's steam ID (required): STEAM_1:1:92941799 What did the player do: FailRP - Unrestrained himself with guns pointed at him during a hostage situation. Evidence (required): What do you believe should happen to the player: Warn Any extra information: was told to take it on the forums

+support this guy is more active than some of the command we already have Not afraid to speak what he really thinks Professional and can actually order people around I mean this in the nicest way possible, but everyone who said "who are you" so far probably don't know him because you guys are never on. Especially the command. And let's be real, he's missing 22 words. It's not the end of the world.

change the way staff operates

You can say that about the handcuffs that and other departments? Better get to recordin then

So does cert and state It would cause more good than harm, also anyone who is a LCPL can apply for state, who also have it. Gonna need evidence then. If they get arrested, they will need a reason for a valid search. (e.g. a terry frisk), otherwise its against the 4th amendment. -> demote if invalid

you could say that about any unit

The sliding doors are technically lockable, but the way maps work is that there are these little boxes around the doors, when an entity (person, entity, etc) enter this box, it toggles the door that is linked to the box. source: edited some maps before. if this door is locked, the door will not slide.

What you want to see? - pd should have weapon checkers -> LCPL+ since LCPL can apply for state, and state has it. So does fbi... and ss... etc. Why should we add it? - handcuffing someone, then checking, then unhandcuffing takes way too long than it should (~7 seconds vs 1 second) What are the advantages of having this? - faster times to check ppl. Who is it mainly for? - pd Links to any content -

+support Let's be real, nobody knows what this guy adverted in the first place.

Someone should not be held accountable for something that happened over a year ago. just my .02

It seems that there is some obvious bias between people who have access to the negev, and to those who do not. So while I am going to answer the question while being as un-bias as possible, I am going to try to point out both sides of the argument and give my conclusive answer. Negev Side I paid $x for this, so the item I should have should not be changed It's just how the Negev is Non-Negev Side High RoF, Damage output Unfair to gov as we do not possess such weaponry Thesis statement: The Negev should be nerfed, as it provides unfair roleplay, and is generally overpowered. Objection 1: The Negev should not be nerfed, as I have paid for this product, therefore I should not have this item removed/nerfed Objection 2: The Negev is not overpowered, as the recoil is horrible, and it is easy to counter I answer that: The Negev has a high ammo capacity, with a high damage output, as well as a high Rate of Fire (RoF). The fact that someone can mow down five officers is unfair as Government do not have access to this type of weaponry. No single weapon within the PD has access to any sort of weaponry that can match the Negev. It's extremely high damage cannot be outdamaged, even with multiple (assuming 2-4 with M4's) officers, as the officers will simply be picked off one by one, negating the average damage overtime, while the Negev stays at a constant rate of DPS (or shots rather), until said person is dead. Let's also include the most common bank raids, where multiple people with negevs are there. There is simply no match with 5 negevs versus the government, unless gas is involved. Response to Objection 1: Zeeptin (or whoever wrote it) in the Terms of Service writes "We have the right to change any package at any time for any reason including stopping of a server or package without any notice." By purchasing said item(s), you agreed that these items could be modified or revoked. Therefore, it is not a valid argument that "I paid for it, it should stay the same". Furthermore, it is unfair to people who do not pay any sort of monetary good to be at the bottom of the chain. Although paying is necessary to gain an advantage, there is a line between, "I have a chance" and "I cannot win no matter what I do". Response to Objection 2: Although the recoil by itself appears to be pretty bad, this can be negated by crouch jumping. At this point it is basically a laser. Not to mention the crosshair that notes where the weapon is going to go, so you can always use that to counteract the negev. Although any weapon can do this, the negev with its terrible recoil completely demolishes every other weapon, with its high rate of fire, and its damage output. It's only counter is not getting shot, and shooting back. This can be said for any weapon. Restatement and Conclusion: The Negev should be nerfed, as it provides unfair roleplay, and is generally overpowered. The high damage output and its high rate of fire is what makes this weapon overpowered. It's recoil is easily counteract-able, and its damage dropoff is no less than any other weapon. The terms of service clearly notes that any package can be modified or revoked, therefore any argument saying that X purchased Y is invalid. It should also be noted that any suggestions are made (or should be made) for the common good of the server. Through this reasoning, it appears that nerfing the negev is the best logical option.

+support I'm not sure about everyone else, but whenever I am on, I always see him on. And I'm on pretty damn frequently if I do say so myself. Application in my opinion is fine, he gets to the point. A few run on sentences, but it's not a big of a deal, unlike other applications that are huge and a pain to read, which ultimately says the same thing over and over again. He went out of his way to interact with me and give his opinion on a situation that I have had previously, although it appears some miscommunication happened. He did what he believed was best, and that is something that more staff need, not just something that people will not do because they are afraid of repercussions. Out of all the interactions I've had with Zerg, they have been pleasant.

You can also see through tinted windows. It's not my fault he made it visible.

Explain to me logically why I would lie if I have clear evidence that I have it. The whole point is the fact that if I did not have evidence, I would have gotten warned for it without appeal. There was some reasonable doubt, which is the whole point of not getting warned. There should be no reasonable doubt that the offender committed the offence. No, you brought me multiple times and got Zerg involved. You could have warned me then and there, or not at all. read this

Why would I lie about seeing your printers if I have proof of it.? You can clearly see through the gap. Also showing that I am a CPT gives me more credibility than I would as a SNR. Obviously If someone reports someone else in PD as an OFC, versus a LT, then I'm going to believe the LT more. "thats going straight to alton"

That's the light reflection more evidence: There is a gap you can see through

Your In-game: Monekybags Your SteamID: STEAM_1:1:155903311 The admin's name in-game: HamsterofTF2 The admin's steam name (If you know it): N/A What warning did you receive: Lying to Staff Evidence of the warn (REQUIRED): Why do you think this warn was false: I have evidence that I saw the printers, but I was warned because "There is no way I could see it." and "Lying to staff". They asked if I saw him open his fading door, I might have said he might have, I ended up saying twice "I don't remember". Any extra information: