[GL] Fizz-y Soda

+support issa heist

Good luck

-support Do a mass test then.

It definely shows what weapon/swep you were holding and where you were. That's how RDM sits work.... i have gotten killed just for pulling our my cigarette then the staff who take the sit agree it's RDM once they see i was holding the cig and not a weapon.

+Support Really is no reason to buy it since you can't use on dclass. Every other job will have better weapons already. Especially those that require long range weapons, already come with better ones.

Did you check logs at all?

+Support Sit was not handled like they usually are. I would also be conflicted if my sit was handled this way. Seeing that every other sit ive been in that regarded reporting another player, we are both brought 100% of the time.

+Support Sounds cool

E4 at PFC Was fun time back then.

The incident and the sit were 10 mins apart. He was already offline at this point, and was not brought to a sit. You cant warn someone without them being in the sit. You should have taken this to the forums for the FairRP warn since he was not online at the time of the sit. Badaim should have not been warned at all.

+Support Was not LTAP. Staff took too long No sit

+support ye

+support

To be fair, RP events don't get a lot of attention. I think it's gotten to the point where people feel discouraged to host RP events over combat ones because of this lack of attendance.

Thanks to all those who tried out. Needless to say it was a massive success!

Poor guy, he's so used to getting into denied he has ptsd Welcome back! Your last appeal was accepted !

What are you suggesting? - Remove all reaction features + rep. (Or just negative reacts) We can express our opinion very clearly on posts by providing a +/-Support and an explanation attached. We can also like or dislike posts that we agree or disagree with, but a big issue is mostly tied to dislike reactions. People have been penalized for disliking posts even though they are just expressing their opinion without going in-depth. I'm aware that there are people that rep bomb, but those cases should be investigated and judged based on repeated offenses within a period of time and not by coincidence. Right now, if a group of like-minded individuals all disagree with the post, and dislike it together, they may be punished for rep bombing. Even if it wasn't coordinated at all. If 1 person disliked 1 post today, and it happened to get 10 additional dislikes, that person may be prosecuted for rep bombing along with everyone else involved. Forum diplomats even go as far as removing negative reactions if they get a big number of dislikes. Effectively making the rep system inaccurate as users rep is getting altered. If we are going to have a reputation system that is affected by people liking and disliking our posts, then it shouldn't be altered. If people cannot handle the idea of having their posts disliked and accept people's opinions, then we shouldn't have this system in place. If people are abusing the rep system, then it needs to be properly investigated and reviewed. At the very least, we need to remove negative reactions so these issues of rep bombing and people getting punished for being involved in a post that received mass dislikes. However, I think we should just get rid of rep as a whole. How would this make the website better? - Users don't have to fear of unnecessary repercussions because they are disliking a post they genuinely feel is poorly thought out. It will also help partially remove some forum toxicity with the rep system.

+support

What are you suggesting? - display player level in the box above people's head. How would this change better the server? - Help identify new players incase they appear to be struggling. Happened yesterday and hunting their name down on tablist was a nuisance Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - adding more stuff to the box Who would this change mostly benefit? - Pretty much everyone. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A

I know who hid them. Thanks for clearing up the editing part.

So is nothing in this thread going to get hidden? Perhaps "your stupid" didn't need to get hidden. Maybe toaster should have just called him a fucking bitch then the post wouldn't have gotten hidden. Also, why hide it? I rarely ever see the edit feature utilized. Could have easily removed "your stupid" if it was so toxic.

You have my alleged support! +support