Dr. Shaw who is inactive

Your in game name: MTF E11 FTO MSGT Shaw 381S UwU Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:109194791 The player's in game name: PSU JFTO MSGT Peggu UwU The player's steam ID (required): STEAM_0:1:150759047 What did the player do: Go into lower dblock and kill class-d Evidence (required): What do you believe should happen to the player: Warn for FailRP Any extra information: They went into lower and shot me and another class-d

You can edit it to follow the format and delete it your self. Just go to moderator actions.

Follow the format

I was told by boris in TeamSpeak that he was planning on making an alt and joining security. I'm friends with the dude but I believe you here. Sorry boris.... I was told by boris in TeamSpeak that he was planning on making an alt and joining security. I'm friends with the dude but I believe you here. Sorry boris....

F

What you want to see? - Make it so 939 should be only tranqed when under 2000 health (From his original 2500, which is also his base health). Why should we add it? - Would make it so 939 wouldn't just immediately be tranqed upon the first interaction with MTF or somebody with a tranq. I've been breached as 939 many times and I turn the first corridor and a MTF Sees me, tranqs me, crouches so I can't kill him. And just like that I'm rced. It also wouldn't take long at all to take off the 500 health needed but it would prevent any immediate recontainment What are the advantages of having this? - ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Who is it mainly for? - SCP 939 Links to any content - N/A ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contact me with any concerns

Neutral I think that mike should receive a staff strike but I understand that because he is a trial mod he will most likely be removed. I know that mike is not inherently abusive and will learn his lesson after this. But, this is abuse of powers and I acknowledge that and whatever SMT decides will happen. But I personally would like to hear all the context behind this before I move to any one side. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And E11

+Support Yes yes yes and more yes! This would make combat way more immersive. --------------------------------------------------------

+ Support Would be very cool to have and fun to do depending on what it is honestly If they do add this it probably wouldn't have any high rewards and if its a daily it would be even less. I would suggest they add a message saying "Do not team with enemy factions or you will be warned" or something teaming with same faction or friend in a friendly faction I think would be fine. -------------------------------------------------------------------

+Support Honestly it would make killing/re-containing SCP-682 way more realistic because at the current moment literally a foxtrot could kill the thing in under 3 minutes. Speed should be slightly buffed. ---------------------------------------------------------------- -

They are cool, but I personally preferred the more sleek design of the previous ones.

merry christmas you big minges

I can't really choose, I've only seen events from PRP and SCPRP

If rang told you to appeal because you were already warned for it then +Support But alas rang still needs to confirm @Rangiatea

Hmmmmmm

Please yes

-Support I want to see this but It could be so easy just not to flag on to prevent the scp from breaching, 70 players minimum is all we need.

someone needs to accept this lmao

Contact Hotshot

What did I just read? Seriously, I can't make out anything in this post Fix it up until then -Support