Dr. Lee

+ Support

Grade: 98% Test Quality: Quality Lore: 18/20 Good lore, and great background. However, it does say that it doesn't respond to sounds. Creativity: 20/20 Good creativity for your test. Presentation: 20/20 Great presentation and detail about the amount of time spent. Writing: 40/40 No errors found, great job.

Grade: 85% Test Quality: Standard Lore: 15/20 Good lore test, however not enough background research about 294. E.g. What it is/what is does. Creativity: 20/20 Good creativity for your test. Presentation: 10/20 Good evidence, and the little detail you gave, however your observation was lacking in general. E.g. How much health did the D-Class have before life. How did their health get low. Writing: 40/40 No errors found, good job.

Grade: 90% Test Quality: Quality Lore: 15/20 Great lore test, however there is not enough background present about the SCP. Creativity: 20/20 Great creativity, haven't seen a 912 test in a while. Presentation: 15/20 Good evidence however its a bit lacking in your observation. Example: There was no indication of damage if any during the first attack. Or if the SCP tried to reattach said pieces. Writing: 40/40 No errors that a found good job.

Grade: 98% Test Quality: Quality Lore: 18/20 Great lore, perhaps just a little bit more background. Creativity: 20/20 Great creativity of your test. Presentation: 20/20 Great presentation, and details about the Bot. Writing: 40/40 No errors or issues found Great test.

Grade: 97% Test Quality: Quality Lore: 17/20 Great Lore friendly test of course, however relevant background about more of the SCP. Creativity: 20/20 Great test idea for the SCP. Presentation: 20/20 Nice presentation, and very well organized and detailed of your findings. Writing: 40/40 No errors or issues found. Great test.

+ Support well having the old firing would clash with the new map, I would like to see a better use of the space. I, myself am not apart of GenSec or MTF, but I think the armory is pretty useless to those branches.

- Support

Grade: 95% Test Quality: Quality Lore: 20/20 Good background and use of Lore for your test. Creativity: 20/20 Great creativity and extermination test for 173. Presentation: 20/20 Nice presentation, and use of a document for your log. Also good addition of your Audio Log. Writing: 35/40 Over i found no errors within your log. However I found to be a little lacking with details like where the test was conducted and if there was any destruction to the facility, or if your call CC's to clean of the remainder of 173.

Grade: 76% Test Quality: Standard Lore: 18/20 Although you stated what the SCP does when opened you didn't say what the SCP truly is. Creativity: 14/20 This test has been done many times before, I would have liked to have seen what you meant by your hypothesis. Presentation: 14/20 There wasn't much to your presentation as it didn't have much to it. Writing: 30/40 There wasn't any errors that I found, however not much sentences in your log.

Grade: 66% Test Quality: Standard Lore: 14/20 Of course background knowledge shows us that we can't look at anything containing 096, however I would have like to see how his body/figure would(n't) benefit your test. Creativity: 20/20 I like the creativity of your test and the object you used. Presentation: 12/20 Your presentation was okay, but lacking a bit in detail. Writing: 20/40 There was some grammar issues with your log, and also I would have liked to have seen a few more sentences in your log.

Grade: 62% Test Quality: Standard Lore: 10/20 There wasn't much background of the SCP itself. Creativity: 17/20 You stated that the test has been done before, it is not bad to preform tests again. However we know the outcome to this test, maybe with better knowledge you can better equip D-Class to withstand the conditions. Presentation: 10/20 There was little detail about your research, in your hypothesis you stated that if you look away it would help. In your observation, you didn't state whether you instructed them to, or if they even looked away. Writing: 25/40 Although there wasn't much grammar/spelling issues your log was lacking in log article.

Grade: 97% Test Quality: Quality Lore: 20/20 Good background as it aligns with your testing. Creativity: 20/20 Great test idea, never really seen this before. Good job. Presentation: 17/20 Great presentation overall and use of your visual stimuli with your video. I wish you had just a bit more detail in your observation. Writing: 40/40 No grammar or misspelled words so great work!

Grade: 75% Test Quality: Standard Lore: 10/20 There wasn't much background about SCP-1025. Understandably most people know the concept and have general knowledge of the SCP. However I would have liked to see more Lore background of the SCP, Creativity: 20/20 Good test idea, and good job on getting the D-class to Medbay to check on his symptoms. Presentation: 10/20 Your presentation was okay, I would have liked to see a bit more writing and detail. Writing: 35/40 I didn't find any spelling or grammar errors, but again it's empty.

Grade: 88% Test Quality: Standard Lore: 13/20 Everything you mentioned was relevant to your test. However I would have like to see more background on SCP-1048 Creativity: 20/20 Good creativity for a cross test. Presentation: 15/20 Presentation is good, however just a little lacking in detail and response. Writing: 40/40 I couldn't find any mistakes in grammar or spelling.

Grade: 95% Test Quality: Quality Lore: 20/20 Everything you mentioned was relevant to your test. Creativity: 20/20 Good creativity of the test. Presentation: 15/20 Good presentation, however just a little scrunched and hard to read in the beginning but overall good paragraphs. Writing: 40/40 I couldn't find any mistakes in grammar or spelling.

Grade: 90% Test Quality: Quality Lore: 15/20 This test has some lore. Creativity: 20/20 Nice creativity with the test. Presentation: 20/20 Good Google Doc presentation. Nice addiction of the Audio log. Writing: 35/40 Minor grammar but overall great.

This is a really nice test log. Good Job.

+Support Its about time we give Utility better bunks.

+Support

Name: Dr. Lee Current Rank: Lead Researcher Time in Research (Approximate): About one month. Why should you be research command, AKA what can you bring to the table that the rest of command can't? (100-word minimum): I would like to become a part of Research Command as I feel I would be a good fit within Command. Now, I don’t know what I could ‘bring to the table’ that other command members can’t as every command member has their way of carrying out their duties and responsibilities. I understand that some guidelines and expectations are set. However, things that I would be able to bring to the command table are hard work, dedication, a valuable team player, activity, and seriousness when it comes to being a respected, trusted, and an authoritative figure within Research. A few months ago I was on the server before I had to leave for personal reasons, nevertheless, I know that staff is different from command but they do have their similarities. When it comes to higher up positions no matter what server, or game that I’m a part of I take my responsibilities, duties, and other expectations seriously. I’m very approachable, which is a good quality to have for higher ranks What will you do to make research more active and better? (100 word minimum)(Tangible items like activity, expertise or the ability to run trainings, etc)?: What I will do to make Research more active is to first host mass trainings for research. I don’t really see those being done. I believe doing mass training is a good way to show that research is active as a whole, but that there are actual people to train others. I am also moderately active, so that makes it easier for researchers to be able to ask questions, or if they have reports, especially since supervisor’s are the beginning of the CoC. Also I believe that when command is present it makes others get on and work hard to have a chance to get promoted. It also creates an opportunity for others to be able to feel recognized for their activity.