MattOminigo3 Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 (edited) What are you suggesting? - Letting 999 have a bonus to his roll when tickling 682. How would this change better the server? - Currently, SCP-682 is really really hard to recontain. 999 is the best way to recontain as of current and 999 hasn't got much meaningful reasoning to play as. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - 682 players. Who would this change mostly benefit? - The server. Edit: this post was made when 682 had its size swep. It was extremely hard to contain between 0.7x size and it's passive 0.35x. Now it's ok. Edited January 17, 2021 by MattOminigo3 Grinding with Nu7 |Past SGT in A1, Gensec and CI | Was a great Tech | Saved Beanz from doom thrice | Didn't save Rang | Gets bullied by Surge | Loves all in the server Custom Classes: Spy, D-Class 2304 | CNTN Bot , Raptor Team |Tango - 14, CTF Retired DoTF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rito Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 +Support but if the 682 being swapped to platinium suggestion gets accepted, then don't add this Current: Nu-7 VCMDR Former: E-11 VCMDR/LT-COL totally didn't get demoted || Event Team Member || CI SFTO 2LT CCs: Snoop Dog Owner || Previous Rho-36 Occult Operative || Used to be Reznov || CI TF2 Heavy || MTF Zeta-0 'Caste Gates' || Tango-12 'Forgiving Hand' French Canadian man || Mbappé fan in the making Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altair Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 (edited) WTH IS THIS Edited December 27, 2020 by Tweety 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kodaㅤ Posted December 27, 2020 Share Posted December 27, 2020 1 hour ago, vSquishyv said: +Support but if the 682 being swapped to platinium suggestion gets accepted, then don't add this Nu7 CPT | Nu7 DHFTO | Head of Degeneracy | Former OH7 | | HSU #1 | Ex Nu7 MAJ | Ex DHFTO | Ex HSU Commissar | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pills Posted January 3, 2021 Share Posted January 3, 2021 On 12/26/2020 at 10:24 PM, vSquishyv said: +Support but if the 682 being swapped to platinium suggestion gets accepted, then don't add this Former: 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐃𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 - 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltable Posted January 3, 2021 Share Posted January 3, 2021 -Support Doesn't 999 legit have the same basic roll system on the server, 999 just has to roll against 682 and win. There's no legit reason for 999 to get a +10 roll against 682 other than unfairly wanting the 682 player to be re-contained in an already semi "shitty" system, I mean the fact that someone can magically just have their breach ruined by 999 in the first place is shit and now your asking to give 999 even more power. I understand MTF use 999 to help re-contain 682 but he should not become the "go to source" of re-containment, he should act as a secondary source of re-containment, if his roll fails people should sit around waiting for 999's 5 min timer they should be continuously trying to re-contain 682. There are already plans in the works to nerf 682, we do not need even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comrade Boekhom Posted January 3, 2021 Share Posted January 3, 2021 4 minutes ago, Coltable said: -Support Doesn't 999 legit have the same basic roll system on the server, 999 just has to roll against 682 and win. There's no legit reason for 999 to get a +10 roll against 682 other than unfairly wanting the 682 player to be re-contained in an already semi "shitty" system, I mean the fact that someone can magically just have their breach ruined by 999 in the first place is shit and now your asking to give 999 even more power. I understand MTF use 999 to help re-contain 682 but he should not become the "go to source" of re-containment, he should act as a secondary source of re-containment, if his roll fails people should sit around waiting for 999's 5 min timer they should be continuously trying to re-contain 682. There are already plans in the works to nerf 682, we do not need even more. Chad of many names Professional Shit talker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rookieblue Posted January 3, 2021 Share Posted January 3, 2021 2 hours ago, Coltable said: -Support Doesn't 999 legit have the same basic roll system on the server, 999 just has to roll against 682 and win. There's no legit reason for 999 to get a +10 roll against 682 other than unfairly wanting the 682 player to be re-contained in an already semi "shitty" system, I mean the fact that someone can magically just have their breach ruined by 999 in the first place is shit and now your asking to give 999 even more power. I understand MTF use 999 to help re-contain 682 but he should not become the "go to source" of re-containment, he should act as a secondary source of re-containment, if his roll fails people should sit around waiting for 999's 5 min timer they should be continuously trying to re-contain 682. Retired SCP-RP Head of Staff March 3rd, 2019 - December 16th, 2021 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sprink Posted January 3, 2021 Share Posted January 3, 2021 2 hours ago, Coltable said: -Support Doesn't 999 legit have the same basic roll system on the server, 999 just has to roll against 682 and win. There's no legit reason for 999 to get a +10 roll against 682 other than unfairly wanting the 682 player to be re-contained in an already semi "shitty" system, I mean the fact that someone can magically just have their breach ruined by 999 in the first place is shit and now your asking to give 999 even more power. I understand MTF use 999 to help re-contain 682 but he should not become the "go to source" of re-containment, he should act as a secondary source of re-containment, if his roll fails people should sit around waiting for 999's 5 min timer they should be continuously trying to re-contain 682. There are already plans in the works to nerf 682, we do not need even more. Deputy Head of Security | Executive Event Team | Admin | Forum Diplomat | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squash Posted January 3, 2021 Share Posted January 3, 2021 2 hours ago, Coltable said: -Support Doesn't 999 legit have the same basic roll system on the server, 999 just has to roll against 682 and win. There's no legit reason for 999 to get a +10 roll against 682 other than unfairly wanting the 682 player to be re-contained in an already semi "shitty" system, I mean the fact that someone can magically just have their breach ruined by 999 in the first place is shit and now your asking to give 999 even more power. I understand MTF use 999 to help re-contain 682 but he should not become the "go to source" of re-containment, he should act as a secondary source of re-containment, if his roll fails people should sit around waiting for 999's 5 min timer they should be continuously trying to re-contain 682. There are already plans in the works to nerf 682, we do not need even more. Foundation Archivist | Operations Supervisor | SCP-RP Senior Admin | Forums Diplomat | Support 1 | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
enuz 💣 Posted January 3, 2021 Share Posted January 3, 2021 3 hours ago, Coltable said: -Support Doesn't 999 legit have the same basic roll system on the server, 999 just has to roll against 682 and win. There's no legit reason for 999 to get a +10 roll against 682 other than unfairly wanting the 682 player to be re-contained in an already semi "shitty" system, I mean the fact that someone can magically just have their breach ruined by 999 in the first place is shit and now your asking to give 999 even more power. I understand MTF use 999 to help re-contain 682 but he should not become the "go to source" of re-containment, he should act as a secondary source of re-containment, if his roll fails people should sit around waiting for 999's 5 min timer they should be continuously trying to re-contain 682. There are already plans in the works to nerf 682, we do not need even more. trying not to witchhunt... this is just an opinion Former Head of Janitorial | HCZ man geer | lvl 70 life wizard | Roblox Clothing Designer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spud Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 On 1/3/2021 at 2:08 PM, Coltable said: -Support Doesn't 999 legit have the same basic roll system on the server, 999 just has to roll against 682 and win. There's no legit reason for 999 to get a +10 roll against 682 other than unfairly wanting the 682 player to be re-contained in an already semi "shitty" system, I mean the fact that someone can magically just have their breach ruined by 999 in the first place is shit and now your asking to give 999 even more power. I understand MTF use 999 to help re-contain 682 but he should not become the "go to source" of re-containment, he should act as a secondary source of re-containment, if his roll fails people should sit around waiting for 999's 5 min timer they should be continuously trying to re-contain 682. There are already plans in the works to nerf 682, we do not need even more. Armored Shield | Gensec MAJ | EWD | DHFTO | OPRF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jameshi34 Posted January 4, 2021 Share Posted January 4, 2021 On 1/3/2021 at 2:08 PM, Coltable said: -Support Doesn't 999 legit have the same basic roll system on the server, 999 just has to roll against 682 and win. There's no legit reason for 999 to get a +10 roll against 682 other than unfairly wanting the 682 player to be re-contained in an already semi "shitty" system, I mean the fact that someone can magically just have their breach ruined by 999 in the first place is shit and now your asking to give 999 even more power. I understand MTF use 999 to help re-contain 682 but he should not become the "go to source" of re-containment, he should act as a secondary source of re-containment, if his roll fails people should sit around waiting for 999's 5 min timer they should be continuously trying to re-contain 682. There are already plans in the works to nerf 682, we do not need even more. YES COLTABLE Gensec LTCOL | Deputy Head Warden | S.T.A.R.S. | Michael Jones Enthusiast do you are have stupid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOBeanz Posted January 8, 2021 Share Posted January 8, 2021 -Support Having 999 be able to roll at all against 682 is already a 50/50 shot at instant recontainment. This is extremely powerful as is, I see no need to buff it currently. O5-9: "Misfortune" A.K.A. "Mr. Unlucky" "Accidents Happen-- Mostly to me!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theblueking87 Posted January 8, 2021 Share Posted January 8, 2021 1 hour ago, CanOBeanz said: Having 999 be able to roll at all against 682 is already a 50/50 shot at instant recontainment. This is extremely powerful as is, I see no need to buff it currently. WHEN COULD 999 DO THAT ive missed so much jeez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The CI Zero Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 On 1/3/2021 at 11:08 AM, Coltable said: -Support Doesn't 999 legit have the same basic roll system on the server, 999 just has to roll against 682 and win. There's no legit reason for 999 to get a +10 roll against 682 other than unfairly wanting the 682 player to be re-contained in an already semi "shitty" system, I mean the fact that someone can magically just have their breach ruined by 999 in the first place is shit and now your asking to give 999 even more power. I understand MTF use 999 to help re-contain 682 but he should not become the "go to source" of re-containment, he should act as a secondary source of re-containment, if his roll fails people should sit around waiting for 999's 5 min timer they should be continuously trying to re-contain 682. There are already plans in the works to nerf 682, we do not need even more. "𝘕𝘰 𝘐 𝘢𝘪𝘯'𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯' '𝘊𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘵'𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘸𝘦'𝘷𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘵 𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯' 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘧 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘪𝘯'𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯'?" -Retired CI MAJ Zero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balancer Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 -Support This is just a complainer's way to try and get an unfair advantage over SCP-682. A normal roll like everything else in the server is fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazyhorse Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 On 1/3/2021 at 1:08 PM, Coltable said: -Support Doesn't 999 legit have the same basic roll system on the server, 999 just has to roll against 682 and win. There's no legit reason for 999 to get a +10 roll against 682 other than unfairly wanting the 682 player to be re-contained in an already semi "shitty" system, I mean the fact that someone can magically just have their breach ruined by 999 in the first place is shit and now your asking to give 999 even more power. I understand MTF use 999 to help re-contain 682 but he should not become the "go to source" of re-containment, he should act as a secondary source of re-containment, if his roll fails people should sit around waiting for 999's 5 min timer they should be continuously trying to re-contain 682. There are already plans in the works to nerf 682, we do not need even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack II Posted January 18, 2021 Share Posted January 18, 2021 On 1/3/2021 at 2:08 PM, Coltable said: -Support Doesn't 999 legit have the same basic roll system on the server, 999 just has to roll against 682 and win. There's no legit reason for 999 to get a +10 roll against 682 other than unfairly wanting the 682 player to be re-contained in an already semi "shitty" system, I mean the fact that someone can magically just have their breach ruined by 999 in the first place is shit and now your asking to give 999 even more power. I understand MTF use 999 to help re-contain 682 but he should not become the "go to source" of re-containment, he should act as a secondary source of re-containment, if his roll fails people should sit around waiting for 999's 5 min timer they should be continuously trying to re-contain 682. There are already plans in the works to nerf 682, we do not need even more. Rejected from the gaminglight community Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangiatea Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. "A good soldier obeys without question. A good officer commands without doubt." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts