Jump to content

Make 173s CC Level 2 - Accepted


Sixx

Recommended Posts

What are you suggesting? - Make 173s Door CC level 2.

How would this change better the server? - Currently with 173s CC being level 3, most GenSec cannot open the door to help assist in the re containment of 173 or let people out of the containment. Because 173s CC is so close to D-Block this can make it very frustrating for GenSec to re contain him as they cannot open or close his CC door. 

Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - Cracking time of the door will be low.

Who would this change mostly benefit? - GenSec and other Foundation Personnel in LCZ.

Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A.

[ SCP RP ] Director of Research & Security || Armored Shield Award Winner || First Head Warden & HOPO || Security Artillery Unit || D-7025 || D-Class High Council || Former Head of Security || Former Admin || Former Event Team Member

 

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+Support

Yeah, preventing JRs, most of maintenance, and all Gensec Enlisted and NCOs from accessing 173 wouldn't do anyone any good

Current: None

Former: Security Sergeant Major (and SFC), Director of Logistics, Alpha-1 Private First Class, CI Mil Private First Class (and E4 C6), Nu7 Lance Corporal, CI RnD Supervisory Agent (and EOI F3) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Right Twix Bar said:

+Support

Yeah, preventing JRs, most of maintenance, and all Gensec Enlisted and NCOs from accessing 173 wouldn't do anyone any good

Yeah, most of maintenance can't access the CC now for cleaning and repairing.

 SCPRP Director of Logistics, Event TeamFormer Nu7 2LT, Former Senior Admin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Right Twix Bar said:

+Support

Yeah, preventing JRs, most of maintenance, and all Gensec Enlisted and NCOs from accessing 173 wouldn't do anyone any good

+ Support

Joined 09/30/2020
Retired 11/12/2022
Former Security SFC || Former MTF Omi9 MSGT || Former CI CPT/MAJ || Former Nu7 LTCOL/VCMDR || Former E11 CPL || Former Maintenance Professional || Former D5 CPT || Former Senior Medic || Former Advanced Researcher |

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Right Twix Bar said:

+Support

Yeah, preventing JRs, most of maintenance, and all Gensec Enlisted and NCOs from accessing 173 wouldn't do anyone any good

Poor Jrs cant test on it now WHO COULD HAVE DONE THIS (+SUPPORT)

 Former RESEARCH Manager Zack Morden 
 FORMER SECURITY 2LT JFTO Zack Morden

Change is a good thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Right Twix Bar said:

+Support

Yeah, preventing JRs, most of maintenance, and all Gensec Enlisted and NCOs from accessing 173 wouldn't do anyone any good

I saw 173 breach because Maintenance couldn't get through the door

Former:

𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐃𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 - 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+/-support

 

I don't even understand why it was changed in the first place, it never was a problem.

 

The only reason I would give it a "-support" is to buff 173. Its capture is so easy any gensec can do it, and it's impossible to breach as 173 effectively during normal hours. Setting the doors on lvl 3 would mean that only security wardens/juggs/CMD/CCs (and MTFs or researchers with clearance lvl 3) would be able to recontain 173.

Edited by Eem
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Eem said:

+/-support

 

I don't even understand why it was changed in the first place, it never was a problem.

 

The only reason I would give it a "-support" is to buff 173. Its capture is so easy any gensec can do it, and it's impossible to breach as 173 effectively during normal hours. Setting the doors on lvl 3 would mean that only security wardens/juggs/CMD/CCs (and MTFs or researchers with clearance lvl 3) would be able to recontain 173.

I imagine when the map was updated it was a accidental change although that's only a guess. Its Lvl 2 at the moment though. 

  • Like 1

Nothing special here, move on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+Support, this is hampering Security, Research and Maintenance.

"Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?"

EX-Site Director   EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. R&D Senior Inspector

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...