Kim Yo Suk Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 (edited) Your In-Game Name: Kim Yo Umbrella Corp Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:13399109 Staff member's In-Game Name: Trooper Cole Phelp What did they do? Refusing to look at my evidence that I have to offer. Only looks at Yobo evidence only and not my so it is bias of Trooper Cole Phelp to do that. Please review other video in other forum under report center false warn by trooper cole. I accept Cole Phelp apology. I forgive him but like the warn remove. Just a talk or self awareness Cole Phelp need Evidence (REQUIRED): What do you think is an acceptable punishment? I accept Cole Phelp apology. I forgive him but I like the warn remove it was very warm PM he sent me makes me smile. Edited August 5, 2018 by Kim Yo Suk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cole Phelps Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 In this situation, I felt as though I had enough evidence in Yobo's Video and my logs to warrant a judgement regarding the warning of Kim Yo. As you can see in the logs, you and Scout clearly initiated the contact with SWAT, Defending someone that isn't even in the same family as you. On top of that, after this situation, Scout attempted to blackmail me by saying I "Went into your base and threw around all of your printers and bitminers, shooting some as well" -support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Kanny Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 7 minutes ago, Cole Phelps said: In this situation, I felt as though I had enough evidence in Yobo's Video and my logs to warrant a judgement regarding the warning of Kim Yo. As you can see in the logs, you and Scout clearly initiated the contact with SWAT, Defending someone that isn't even in the same family as you. On top of that, after this situation, Scout attempted to blackmail me by saying I "Went into your base and threw around all of your printers and bitminers, shooting some as well" -support Ex. Superadmin - AnimeRP Ex. Senior Admin (AND FIRST) - PoliceRP Ex. Senior Moderator - PoliceRP Ex. Admin - Clonewars Ex. Admin - DarkRP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Yobo Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 10 minutes ago, Cole Phelps said: In this situation, I felt as though I had enough evidence in Yobo's Video and my logs to warrant a judgement regarding the warning of Kim Yo. As you can see in the logs, you and Scout clearly initiated the contact with SWAT, Defending someone that isn't even in the same family as you. On top of that, after this situation, Scout attempted to blackmail me by saying I "Went into your base and threw around all of your printers and bitminers, shooting some as well" -support If only I had the recording of you saying this wont go down well for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timm Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 19 minutes ago, Cole Phelps said: In this situation, I felt as though I had enough evidence in Yobo's Video and my logs to warrant a judgement regarding the warning of Kim Yo. As you can see in the logs, you and Scout clearly initiated the contact with SWAT, Defending someone that isn't even in the same family as you. On top of that, after this situation, Scout attempted to blackmail me by saying I "Went into your base and threw around all of your printers and bitminers, shooting some as well" -support ⦗MilRP: Spetsnaz SCOL | Retired SZ and DI Major General || JvS: Retired Sith Council | Reserve Sentry Darth | Retired Administrator⦘ ⦗IRP: R DT SPC DD9 | R 31st LTCOL || SCP-RP: R HOR & HOS | R CI MSGT⦘ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff Junior Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 +/- support i am unsure if you only need to look at 1 video or both but if you need to look at both of the videos then you should be getting striked but other then that I will stay neutral in this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Yo Suk Posted August 5, 2018 Author Share Posted August 5, 2018 (edited) And you decided not to see my perspective which makes it really unfair for me even though I told you I have my video perspective and yet you refused is unacceptable by all staff. And also, how would you like me to be a staff and not take your evidence and only see 1 side only? I'll wait for your answer Edited August 5, 2018 by Kim Yo Suk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Yo Suk Posted August 5, 2018 Author Share Posted August 5, 2018 1 hour ago, Cole Phelps said: As you can see in the logs, you and Scout clearly initiated the contact with SWAT, Defending someone that isn't even in the same family as you. On top of that, after this situation, Scout attempted to blackmail me by saying I "Went into your base and threw around all of your printers and bitminers, shooting some as well" 1 I don't know what Scout were doing after that situation that only between you two. And no, we didn't defend the non family member we simply defend our member with his property can you stop lying????? And SWAT started this mess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cole Phelps Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 57 minutes ago, Kim Yo Suk said: And you decided not to see my perspective which makes it really unfair for me even though I told you I have my video perspective and yet you refused is unacceptable by all staff. And also, how would you like me to be a staff and not take your evidence and only see 1 side only? I'll wait for your answer I understand where you are coming from and yes, I admit, I made a lapse in my judgement. I have nothing against you or your gang whatsoever and I completely understand where you are coming from. But not once did I lie in my post to you, I was simply stating my side of the story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Posted August 5, 2018 Share Posted August 5, 2018 (edited) +/- support Staff should look at both sides of the evidence not just one side. That is being bias. You cant defend a person not in your family. At most just a warning for Cole, Nothing more. Edited August 5, 2018 by seanjpo 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[THc] Nand Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 7 hours ago, Rhenic said: Agreed. 7 hours ago, seanjpo said: +/- support Staff should look at both sides of the evidence not just one side. That is being bias. You cant defend a person not in your family. At most just a warning for Cole, Nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 7 hours ago, seanjpo said: +/- support Staff should look at both sides of the evidence not just one side. That is being bias. You cant defend a person not in your family. At most just a warning for Cole, Nothing more. Retired Superadmin || Member since 2016 Retired ImperialRP High Command Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Joe Mama Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 19 hours ago, seanjpo said: +/- support Staff should look at both sides of the evidence not just one side. That is being bias. You cant defend a person not in your family. At most just a warning for Cole, Nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Posted August 6, 2018 Share Posted August 6, 2018 On 8/5/2018 at 2:09 PM, seanjpo said: +/- support Staff should look at both sides of the evidence not just one side. That is being bias. You cant defend a person not in your family. At most just a warning for Cole, Nothing more. PoliceRP Manager Retired SRT Commander | Police Commissioner | Department Supervisor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArmyGuy Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 Yeah like everyone is has said, he should've probs looked at both sides before it no matter what, but yeah you can't defend a non family member even if friend, you'd of course need some initial or ect. matching up with the names crating a family or something +/-Support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh aka Spike Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 23 minutes ago, ArmyGuy said: Yeah like everyone is has said, he should've probs looked at both sides before it no matter what, but yeah you can't defend a non family member even if friend, you'd of course need some initial or ect. matching up with the names crating a family or something +/-Support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Kill Posted August 7, 2018 Share Posted August 7, 2018 3 hours ago, ArmyGuy said: Yeah like everyone is has said, he should've probs looked at both sides before it no matter what, but yeah you can't defend a non family member even if friend, you'd of course need some initial or ect. matching up with the names crating a family or something +/-Support Just like ArmyGuy said you should have looked at both sides first and than made a choice bc in this case I would seem unfair that only one person gave proof and when the other had proof too the judge (you) wouldn’t see it it kida makes it biest so I agree with everyone else. (John Kill) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrycE ? Posted August 9, 2018 Share Posted August 9, 2018 +Support Many people are saying you shouldn't defend another family member, but this is a staff report, hes reporting the staff member for being somewhat bias, Cole has my respect, so does Kim. Cole didn't accept Kims evidence, but accepted Yobos, which is unfair and somewhat bias to kim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan Posted August 11, 2018 Share Posted August 11, 2018 Looking at the video Yobo took, its clear evidence that he shot you guys first and the player logs itself are enough evidence. I understand your frustration with him not wanting to see your side, however, at the end of the day, staff members want to finish sits as fast as they can because they have other people to deal with and Cole believed that those two pieces of evidence were enough to warn you. Sorry that this happened to you though man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leapinglizard101 Posted August 12, 2018 Share Posted August 12, 2018 On 8/5/2018 at 12:09 PM, seanjpo said: +/- support Staff should look at both sides of the evidence not just one side. That is being bias. You cant defend a person not in your family. At most just a warning for Cole, Nothing more. On 8/6/2018 at 7:57 PM, Josh H-Y. said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Ron Posted August 12, 2018 Share Posted August 12, 2018 On 8/9/2018 at 4:29 PM, ? BrycE ? said: +Support Many people are saying you shouldn't defend another family member, but this is a staff report, hes reporting the staff member for being somewhat bias, Cole has my respect, so does Kim. Cole didn't accept Kims evidence, but accepted Yobos, which is unfair and somewhat bias to kim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fame Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 Accepted @Cole Phelps come speak with me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts