Jump to content

[GL] Fizz-y Soda

Member
  • Posts

    1,091
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by [GL] Fizz-y Soda

  1. That's why. You should go to staff members to help, not the community owner. He doesn't like to be bothered for something his staff team is assigned to do. It's in the rules which you are expected to understand. Good luck.
  2. Yes the staff do, but the people MAKING the sits don't. It's just better if EVERYONE was made aware, so it makes sense if they happen to be the unlucky person that falls victim.
  3. If they do get the option to add it again, it should probably be a very expensive addition to balance it out. But -support
  4. -Support The reason why it exists is to avoid staff sits because people aren't aware someone is brainwashed. Just don't be a poor sport...
  5. -Support D class CCs are pretty good where they are at. The Tec9 is pretty trash tbh so it's understandable to have it allowed. Also I'm pretty sure it can be classified as an auto pistol, not an SMG. However this can be debated elsewhere. You're not meant to take out a multiple gensec alone. You can already do that with what we have. If gensec are being active, then that's how it should be. You should NOT be able to wipe out 20 security with some wardens, without CI helping out. Play your cards right.
  6. I was the one who called for your removal. You weren't blacklisted to my knowledge. However you were placed on a temporary do not train list. I understand your testimony, however you directed this word to another member of CI. So it was very disrespectful. We don't tolerate that. So that combined with the derogatory word you used, resulted in your removal. - Support
  7. +Support FailRP and Meta really. What sane D class would help the foundation they just risk their lives escaping??? I feel like anyone who is not in the opposing branch, should not be able to make call outs like this. As for the dclass adverting rule, I think this is abusing that rule slightly. It's not really an "RP" reason as intended by MOTD. I believe the "RP reasons" include things for tests like [ACT] adverts. We don't have police RP on SCP unless there's an event. So making up a fake comms is similar to dclass making up their own comms in dblock, (Which isn't allowed btw) If this scenario doesn't break the adverting rule, then might as well get rid of the rule since pretty much anything will slide. It's not being regulated.
  8. +Support Would make a lot of people's job easier. Ban efficiency increases.
  9. Name: Fizzy Soda Rank: LTCOL Callsign: C0LA Date of LOA Leave/Return: 1/11-1/16 Reason (if private write N/A): Probably should have taken this a few days ago. Just moved into my new place. Internet hasn't been activated. My hotspot ain't worth a damn here. Also I just got promoted at work so spending more hours at work getting everything situated with my new assignment. Will be active on discord if needed. Don't be afraid to PM or ping for anything.
  10. Is pestering a better word? Honestly, I don't think any of this constitutes a ban unless you've had previous warns for similar events. I personally think you should, at most get a warn for this. Lots of other people get let off easier for worse. If you get your CC access touched just for this, you'd have every right to be upset.
  11. Okay. Well going with +Support for harrassment.
  12. Please make sure you have the Chaos tags. You can get them by going to Member self roles, and clicking on the Chaos logo. This should add a new channel. Then requesting your chaos tags in Chaos-requesting-tags
  13. Pretty sure that's 098. Bet you forgot about that one.
  14. +Support This caught my attention scrolling through the forums and I don't even play PRP. However, this will definitely get me on to try. I hope this actually does get added despite the people above saying gmodstore addons won't be added.
×
×
  • Create New...