ViperKimg

Also, I would just like to say that we were all putting in $1,000,000 for a big prize pool for whoever won, so we were really enjoying the races going back and forth in seeing whos game lagged the least and could get to the end first. I don’t understand how that’s copbait, it happens literally all the time IRL. We didn’t have the goal of just shooting cops, our goal was to get to the end and get our money, but when spike trips get involved, everyone starts getting heated. And the “Torty” Family came from us having a couple other non-SX members joining us but still wanting to have the same family name. Torty was just the first thing that came to mind

I am sorry we ruin your RP by causing shootouts, we don’t play on government so we don’t have any perspective on that. I will bring that to the attention of my family. Also, in that last bit where I got arrested, I told my family to just leave me while i get out and surrender then come bail me so this can all be over, then the bailer was blocked. This is why we were so annoyed by it.

Also, this is not being done out of spite because he warned me yesterday. This is something that literally my ENTIRE family that was on decide "yeah, if theyre just going to ruin our RP like that, let's just all get off." We were done shooting, we just wanted an easy way to continue RP. We were just racing each other with our new GTRs and wanted to go back to it. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure the reason the bailer was added was so that you WOUDLN'T have to jailbreak, not so that anyone who wants could just block it off and force jailbreaks.

Thank you, Yobo, for reminding me to put this video in as well. This shows where Colesoft made it impossible to use the bailer without raiding the entire PD (and im pretty sure it says in the motd you arent allowed to raid PD as well)

Your In-Game Name: ViperKimg Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:157110347 Staff member's In-Game Name: Colesoft Grey What did they do? He prop-blocked the bailor so my friends couldn't bail me. Evidence (REQUIRED): What do you think is an acceptable punishment? Warn+Demotion on FBI

I shouldn't have to prove it wasnt copbait. He should have to prove it was. I wasn't recording or getting screenshots, because I was not planning on getting a false warn for copbait. Why does everyone in this community think you're guilty until proven innocent? It should be the other way around.

Yes, it was a crossfire issue because the EMS was too close to the scenario without it being code 4.

What you want to see? - I want to see a new rule added to the staff handbook saying all sits must be conducted with all players present. Why should we add it? - I've been getting a lot of unfair sits lately where I get brought to a sit and the person who reported me just asks the admin "Hey where are you in teamspeak/discord?" and then the admin and player reporting me go into a discord/teamspeak room and have a conversation and I'm left there for 5 minutes just watching both of them look around but I can't hear anything they are saying to each other, then the staff member comes back and just says "Okay, you are going to be receiving a warn today." Or, if I'm the one calling the sit, they'll do the same thing except the staff member will come back and say "Yeah, I can't warn him." Without even taking my side or allowing me to speak. I believe this is EXTREMELY unprofessional as well as unfair. Therefore, whether the sit is going to be held in-game, through teamspeak, or on discord, all members of the sit should be required to be present so that everyone can voice their own side. What are the advantages of having this? - Less false warns/More correct warns Who is it mainly for? - Everyone Links to any content - N/A

The screenshot is the warn evidence. I don't have any evidence of the actually situation. All I can say is I had no intention of copbaiting here.

Your In-game:ViperKimg Your SteamID:STEAM_0:1:157110347 The admin's name in-game:Colesoft The admin's steam name (If you know it):IDK What warning did you receive:copbait Evidence of the warn (REQUIRED): Why do you think this warn was false: He was doing a traffic stop and had his car parked in the middle of the road. I was speeding and didnt see his car when I pulled around the corner. His car ended up flying up and landing on top of my car and it went a very short distance away from the area before falling off my car. I then said "sorry I didn't mean to hit you" over my mic and drove off. By the time I was at the end of the road, I had another warn. Any extra information: I thought the new warn appeal system was going to make trigger happy warns happen less?

I was wanted, please read the post

I don't believe I am wasting anyone's time. This was a false warn. I do not believe in the circumstance that I was under FearRP. You were far enough away from me. If I was close enough to be under FearRP, why didnt you just shoot the car?

Your In-game:ViperKimg Your SteamID:STEAM_0:1:157110347 The admin's name in-game:Pooders The admin's steam name (If you know it):IDK What warning did you receive:FearRP Evidence of the warn (REQUIRED): Below Why do you think this warn was false: Maddog pulled me over and pulled a gun out behind my car and I was wanted, so I got scared and drove away. I don't understand why I was warned for this? I've been told several times that if someone points a gun at your car, you're allowed to drive away. Maddog supposedly shared a video with Pooders and Pooders believed Maddog was close enough to me to consider it FearRP, but from my memory, I do not believe it was. When I requested the video to put it on this post, I was told SMT has said you can get warned for sharing videos? So Maddog said he might put it here. Any extra information:The entire staff sit was held in a discord call with Maddog and Pooders, I was not given a proper chance in-game to voice my side or allowed to see the video that got me warned, so whether it was true or false, this warn was unprofessional and unfair.

I also believe I shouldn't have been warned for that, but I posted a warn appeal and it got instantly denied, then waited a few days and posted a suggestion to add a rule change where you could value your life and flee if they gassed the gen stores and it was also instantly denied. Given this, I just assumed that the motd is permanent and any slight bend of the rules would get you warned, so I feel a warn should have been given out, but like I said, the staff sit ended with a TeamSpeak chat that I wasn't allowed to take part in sooo....

Below is a situation that occurred in-game, but could not be handled by staff. Due to lack of evidence, I have placed it here rather than in the report forums. So, SX had 2 bases built beside each other, we were grinding in one (with bitminers only) and doing a money silo in the other (Every member was currently in the money silo base protecting it). The CERT that was raiding the money silo base ran away from it and began a false raid on the other base because they said they got shot from that base, but it was empty, so that was impossible. I decided not to alert staff of the false raid as all that was happening was the CERT were wasting their time raiding a base with only bitminers in it and no people. They then took a vantage point on that base a began shooting at us from said vantage point. https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1940730839 I talked to both Freeze and MiKeY about this and neither of them could give me a definite answer as to whether or not that would be Fail RP. Here are the facts: The motd states: "You cannot take over places. If you raid a place, you must leave after you have accomplished your goal. Do NOT stay to prevent people from returning for an extended period of time." The main argument that CERT Commander Maddog used was the fact that the rule was focused towards criminal, and did not apply to government, but if this was true, the rule would be under the "Criminal" section rather than right there at the top under "Basics," so the fact that they don't have to follow the rule boggles me. He then made the argument that in real life, government would just get in the other base and use it as a vantage point, but around a month ago I was warned for FailRP for leaving a general store raid after gas was thrown in. I was simply trying to value my life and thought that leaving the general store robbery was a better alternative to sitting in the gas and just waiting to die, but I was still warned because either way, I still broke a rule. So my argument here is that in real life, sure, maybe government would've raided my base for no reason, sure, maybe they would've noticed the clear advantage of shooting at the money silo base from the bitmining base, but these CERT still broke a rule, therefore, I feel there should be a punishment. Despite all of this, the screenshot posted above was the only proof we managed to capture of the situation because none of us were recording at the time and the staff sit lasted longer than 20 minutes, so trying to make an NVIDIA clip or whatever was out of the question. Therefore, I feel a report against the offending players is unnecessary due to the fact that it will just be denied due to a lack of evidence. All Maddog would have to do is say "no we didn't" and it would be over. Because of this, Freeze suggested that I simply make a discussion post rather than a report. I really just want this question answered and am open to different opinions, but I just feel it is unfair for me to get a warn for valuing my life while these CERT members get off without even a verbal. Edit: I would also like to mention that the way this sit ended was the staff member that was handling the sit went into the CERT room in teamspeak to speak to all of them and then pretty much just came back and said "sorry but I can't warn them, I'm just gonna close the sit now." So I have no clue what happened in that TeamSpeak call but I also feel that was a very unfair and unprofessional part of the staff sit.

Can't wait to show you mine and Emptied's base when you get back

I'm not staff and this is the 19th comment, so this'll probably get lost, but I think Jay should not be demoted or removed from staff. A strike may be necessary, but I just feel a demotion to t-mod is not necessary

+support I enjoy our chats

+Support +Support +Support If they combat heal, warn them If they kill EMS, warn them I've never seen roleplay in the hospital on TrueNorth, I've seen it in Rockford, but not here. Armor isn't RP, but it was in the last map and this is Semi-Serious RP Also, the only locations of the Health/Armor NPC's are park and outskirts gas station, the two raidable stores near hospital do not have them.

+support tho, i think it should be appealed. If there's no evidence other than the fact that he killed someone, there's no saying he DID RDM, also, with it becoming harder to appeal warns, this one should go away. Also, as Slick said here, Ender is a very trusted member of the community (or else he wouldnt be snr mod) I think its pretty dang obvious that he wouldnt just LTAP like that. Also, did LuckyGoose ever check logs to see if ender just mugged him or something? or just see he killed someone and left and made a quick warn

+Support I was in this raid. The CERT was standing in the medical tent shooting at us with an AWP. I doubt anything will come from this due to there not being enough screenshot evidence, but with EMS sitting there with the doorway lined up with the door we shoot out of, one of them was bound to get shot eventually. None of this would have happened if the EMS just faced the tent AWAY from my base. He wasn't just shooting anything around the tent, the tent was literally right outside of our door. When they breaching charged it, he shot out and his bullet happened to hit an EMS that for whatever reason thought it was a good idea to place the tent exactly there...

+Support +Always thought this would be cool when I was staff. -Just make sure staff doesn't talk on it too much.

MASSIVE +Support +I've been trying to make SX training guidelines that involve general stores and it's SO hard when the general store robberies end before gov even finds out which one it is. +Also helps EMS due to them not seeing the dots either way. +Grocery Store doesn't even have a dot for ANYONE.

+/- Support + Not 100% sure, but I think Gov already has something like this, so why not EMS? - Gov should know not to spawn EMS vehicles. This shouldn't really BE needed and should just result in a warn/demotion.