Jump to content

Piller

Retired Staff
  • Posts

    1,446
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Everything posted by Piller

  1. Thank you for your time on the server and for being a great ET and staff member. I wish you all the best!
  2. -Support This would mess up the meta and, as Colt said, would cause severe balancing issues amongst the other jobs.
  3. -Support Not needed. Next time talk to HCMD first.
  4. Very good point! Always makes his shot!
  5. Kieran puts it very nicely. Also, wasn't this talked about last week alongside the mech suggestion? I don't think this is needed by any means. But it's not designed to be the same as Enoch. They operate off of two different principles. This is a level 100 job and that's restrictive enough. Regarding GenSec, the dog can't enter d-block, so their primary focus is not compromised. All in all, I feel this suggestion is honestly just a rehashing of previously made suggestions and I personally don't see much point to it. -Support
  6. Hello, I was the banning admin. I received complaints regarding the mentioned video and upon watching it, and seeing that people were disturbed by it, I issued a ban for it. However, given that it did not contain any nudity, or worse, I personally would be okay with you being unbanned, so long as you be more careful going forward.
  7. What they said. It doesn't make sense to remove a feature from Wardens, SF, and HCMD in order to maybe encourage activity for medical. It doesn't make sense from an RP standpoint either since a lot of soldiers in general know how to patch themselves up. Lastly, increasing activity is the job of command, if activity is suffering, then they need to find ways to work around that, not rely on removing features from other people to make them reliant on medical. -Support
  8. -Support This and you have a reputation for being kinda toxic in OOC and for minging far too heavily. In my opinion, these are not traits fitting of a RRH candidate.
  9. -Support Again, we are NOT hiring someone to moderate these trails that everyone keeps talking about. However, we are looking for people to be trial moderator for the server and I think you'd be good for that. +Support for trial moderator
  10. Also, the chain gun is better. The fluence just has a cooler kill effect.
  11. Not every MTF job (or even MOST) have 200/200 or the best guns on the server, yet have a 3 minute NLR. Additionally, you guys spawn right next to D-Block, so that's super unfair for d-class. -Support
  12. Well, GenSec and MTF would only be annoyed if you consider having to consistently run a joint operations campaign to take back the site an annoyance (hint, it's more). I'd also imagine that Research would be annoyed because they like to be able to test stuff and it's hard to do that when you can't access D-Block. This is very broken and would require unrealistic expectations of GenSec to even have a chance for it to not be a complete disaster. With that being said, I feel a good balance to this would be to give GenSec juggs either the fluence or Jorge's chain gun. -Support
  13. I agree with Cosmic. I'm neither CI, or a D-Class main, but it's pretty obvious that this list should still be allowed for the safety of the CI operatives. And by claiming it's metagame, well it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to state that D-Class killing people there to save them should be FailRP. -Support
  14. Regarding Wardens, there was no change on who could access the door. It's the same as before the change, so this is all kind of a moot point. (Unless exspira could before, but I honestly don't remember). Additionally, it's in their own SOP that they need level 4 to interrogate. This was all discussed at length and agreed upon by HCMD+. I see no reason to change this. -Support
  15. Agreed on both parts. Yeah, there's definitely no rule stating you can shoot them unless asked to stop. It's what a lot of staff/players go by, but it's not an actual rule, thus the warn is actually valid. I personally wouldn't warn for it, but it is valid.
  16. Piller

    Pure's Ban Appeal

    -Support until I hear from the banning admin. (+support)
  17. Wow, I did not see that coming. We weren't really close, but all of our interactions were positive and you were a good zone manager and staff. I wish you all the best going forward!
  18. Hi Dr. Clef! So the way that the +/-support feature works is that any member may give their (constructive) feedback and opinion of your application. Generally responding to your own application is somewhat frowned upon by some people, but it's pretty clear that you were just trying to clear some things up and that's okay. I would recommend you editing your initial post to include the scenario questions due to the fact that the Heads of Staff may not see your second post, or not count it. Unfortunately, I do not know you, so I am unable to give any support to this, but I will not be giving -support either. I hope that I've cleared some things up for you and I wish you all the best!
  19. If you can be active in RRH, then I agree with Fool. +Support
  20. After personally getting more clarification from Imperial, I believe you need significantly more time here to show that you are ready for this. -Support
  21. Pretty cool gecko too. Much nicer than his older brother, 682.
×
×
  • Create New...