Rookieblue

Let me direct you to the SCP Roster, which clearly shows all of the ranks in Omi9: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/1/d/1V7W9D4d7ONvpmTS5dwgfI2nw9u8jOJtXs1aX32KlBNY/htmlview#

Denied Ban appeal format incorrect and contains information of another player. Failed to correct after requested to do so.

Denied

I banned you due to having a history of racism and homophobia incidents. These types of misconduct are absolutely prohibited in this community.

You received a blacklist after receiving the following three warnings in rapid succession: 10/17/2020, 08:41:48 - SCP - [GL] Sarge - FailRP (Playing as SCP-173) 10/23/2020, 14:57:36 - SCP - [GL] Eilish - Failrp as 173 10/16/2020, 09:48:51 - SCP - Weiss Schnee[GL] - FailRP | Prop Abuse | SCP-049 Based on the repeated abuse on multiple SCPs, including one of the high abuse SCPs, as well as the multiple warnings in rapid succession you were blacklisted from 049 and 173.

@Probrobronomo Fix your appeal please.

I would support allowing combat cuffing for Sarkics.

+ Support

Not necessarily, the main incentive is XP so players can access higher level jobs.

Denied Based on the information provided in this ban appeal, as well as the other facts provided, this appeal is denied. The core issue in this appeal is whether the player intentionally used an exploit they knew of for personal gain, and the answer to this question is yes. The player discovered a glitch/exploit allowing him to bet a larger amount of money than he should've been able to at the gambling tables. This limit is in place to protect the overall server economy. The player in question states he informed a SMT member of this issue, however no SMT personnel can recall this conversation. Whether or not that is true is irrelevant however, as the player then continued to use this glitch/exploit to bet large sums of money to increase the money he had for his own benefit. The intentional usage of glitches/exploits for personnel or RP gain is prohibited, and as a staff member at the time of the incident, the player in question absolutely should have known better.

Denied RDM is RDM, regardless of if you're killing your friend or not.

Accepted The warning will be removed, no further action is required on your part.

Denied

ACCEPTED You will be contacted to be onboarded to the Forum Diplomat team shortly!

Denied Thank you for your interest, but your application has been denied at this time. You are more than welcome to reapply on the next round of applications.

Highlights Racism Incidents: 5 Posting Porn in a Game Underaged Kids Play: 1

Denied Reporting player engaged in prohibited conduct of combat cuffing, which the reported player than reloaded to be uncuffed. While not necessarily ideal, the prohibited conduct on both sides cancelled each other out. No action will be taken against either party.

Just to clarify for people since there is a lot of misunderstandings, even without today's rule change, E11 isn't out of character on the surface, and hasn't been for awhile. They can engage in scouting and patrol operations on the surface at anytime, but could only shoot in self defense. If E11 had been called into the site however, the E11 could engage in combat at anytime.

I like SWEP option number 2

The reason he was removed from staff was due to having multiple strikes on his record, not this sole incident. Just wanted to clear that portion up for people. Additionally, staff strikes can not be appealed in ban appeals, this would need to be appealed with the Server Manager Igneous directly through whichever avenue Igneous dictates. It should also be noted that Dect noticed that he was able to bet above the prescribed bet limit, and continued to do so to profit off of the unauthorized bets. After learning of the glitch and continuing to use the glitch to profit, that is the definition of exploiting.

More so a bug report than a suggestion, I'm gonna move it there

There is only a very minor thing that is MOTD related, and that's the experience boost. Everything else isn't MOTD related. I'm gonna edit your title to reflect that.

Disguised personnel are prohibited from claiming Command ranks. This will be made clear in the upcoming disguise rule update.

ACCEPTED You will be contacted to be onboarded to the Forum Diplomat team shortly!

ACCEPTED You will be contacted to be onboarded to the Forum Diplomat team shortly!