Aaron Faustin

Hello there.

+Support Adding some light in specific areas would be really nice.

Did King just thumbs down me twice?

What he said. Plus, It does help to balance it out that you can't regain 100% of your armor back.

+Support Clear evidence of prop climbing. This merits a warning for sure. Clover should know better.

Good work Jimmy. Have fun on your LOA.

+ / - Support. I truly do see both sides to this. Rules were broken, However there are also mitigating factors that decide if the punishment is anywhere from a verbal warning to the maximum punishment of a warn and barret destruction. In this case i believe Kev was being honest about it being muscle memory. With that being said I think we should still set a precedent on how this should be handled. and in my opinion (trying to be as unbiased as possible) Kev should have his barret removed but not be given a warning. It should not be muscle memory to inv holster a barret. It needs to be clear that there is a risk when using a barret. We need to uphold this risk. Even though Kev won the fight and their was very little chance that he would have lost after the barret shot, I still think the precedent needs to be set here so people understand the risk of pulling out a barret. Anyone can and will lie and use this as an excuse in the future if their isn't some sort of consequence. As for the staff bias, I just don't see it. You can't say, "Because they were in the same family, there was bias." Sure there is always going to be a minute amount of unconscious bias. But even if there was, 1. It can't be proved and 2. It likely wouldn't effect the outcome in this scenario. I don't think you should toss those words around a respected staff member very lightly. Conclusion: I believe the barret should be destroyed purely out of setting a precedent that more care needs to be taken by players when it comes to barrets and inv holstering them. A line needs to be drawn, and i personally believe this is where to draw it.

-Support 1. This would be super boring RP. 2. This would be very OP. 3. Crim using barretts should not be a reason to upgrade govs arsenal. Using a barrett is extremely risky and could result in losing it. 4. Gov already have a major advantage in Gen stores. Crims are literally trapped. Just think of better tactics.

1. The answer is no it's not enough. 2. You don't have 100k. 3. Again, No.

-Support This was already denied. We are a semi-serious RP server. This would be a pain in the ass to deal with while only adding very minimal RP. Half our playerbase probably couldn't even pass a drivers test.

+Support. In just my personal expierience, It's far too complex and difficult to successfully win a bank robbery. I do partially agree with what Mewy is saying but i think there should be a better happy medium between having RP/Difficulty in robbing the bank but also keep it simple. For example, I like the idea of having alarms in the bank to create more obstacles for you but i don't like the process of transporting the money bags in its current state. I find it near impossible to use a vehicle to move them. This just causes lots of frustration leading to a lack of actual Bank Robbery attempts.

-Support The reasons above but also, If you think about it, If there were to be refunds then the actual value of the vehicle would only be the amount that you don't get back in a refund. It makes these cars realistically way cheaper and essentially allows expensive cars to be a long term placeholder for cash. I hope this made sense. As long as it's made very clear that you don't get a refund then i see no reason to change anything.

But at the end of the day, No department can stand a chance against the 3-4 major criminal families. We run these streets.

What you want to see? - An update to objectives. I'd like to see some sort of passive boost for factions that currently hold an objective. Right now it's not worth it for most players to go around taking objectives. There just isn't really a reward to pay off their efforts. The boost wouldn't need to be big but just a little extra something to keep the objectives competitive. Maybe run a little faster, maybe a little more armor, maybe a slightly faster fire rate, etc. Why should we add it? - Currently i only really see objectives taken when there's nothing else going on in order to get some combat. What are the advantages of having this? - Objectives would be used more. More stuff would go on between factions. Who is it mainly for? - Anyone in a faction Links to any content - N/A

-Support The system we have for printers right now is much better. They are compact, easy to use, upgradable, etc.

-Support In theory this would just add some fun RP but all I can imagine is unrelenting attacks on Gov cars by Criminals making it impossible for them to RP properly.

Goodbye Mar. Take care of yourself.

I mean, depending on the situation corruption can be handled in both OOC and IC. For example, If a PD Lt started arresting everyone for no reason he isn't just going to get in trouble with staff hes also probably going to lose his rank.

-Support. In theory this sound kind of fun but it is much more complicated than it seems. There would have to be a giant new section of rules just for this, And there would have to be lot's of players who just arent allowed to be corrupt such as Command, and trainers. I just can't see this going anywhere but downhill. Really, Really fast.

+Support, Clear evidence. Lay down the hammer.

+Support. This was not the maturity level i expected from a member of the staff team.

Your In-game: Aaron Faustin The player's name in-game: Mrkillzwithcharm The player's steam ID (required): STEAM_0:1:436967161 What did the player do: ARDM | Prop Blocking | Stealing Gov Cars | Running from the sit | LTAP | NITRP | -- This player clearly showed no intent to RP on this server. They showed a complete disregard for the rules and it honestly looked like he was just trying to break as many rules as fast as possible from my perspective. Evidence (REQUIRED): https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/x3h9hmJDv-PPQ/uQTin1jNnvjs?invite=cr-MSxtMk8sOTQ5MzY5MzAs -- This is Cukes perspective of the situation before i even got involved. What do you believe should happen to the player: Upgraded from 10hr ban to atleast 1 week ban. Any extra information: He ran from the sit a couple times in an attempt to continue his spree before i froze him in place. When he realized there was nothing left he could do now that i intervened he ltap'ed. I warned him for his list of offenses but Scruffy could only ban for 10 hours. I'm hoping this can be upgraded on the forums.