Its Buck Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 (edited) Your in game name: CI SGT Buck Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:570251076 The player's in game name: SEC FTO SM ETA10 Guinevere The player's steam ID (required): STEAM_0:1:175407426 The original staff member's name: Security SVFTO 2LT Tank Date and Time This Incident Occurred: 6/17/22 roughly 11:30 AM EST What did the player do: RDM (Killing a cuffed D class) | FailRP (Refusing to escort research for test) What was the disposition of the sit (no action/verbal warning/formal warning/etc): No action sit was closed because Guinevere told the staff to close it Why do you think the disposition was inappropriate?: This was blatent RDM and there is nothing in the MOTD or GENSEC SOP that could remotely justify killing a cuffed D class or refusing to escort. Gensec SOP: "Do not terminate Class-D Personnel w/o valid reasoning. Valid reasons are as follows, passing KOS lines, having fists out after being warned, having a weapon, committing battery, being on the catwalk ledge, etc. You may NOT terminate D-Class for player diss." Evidence (required): https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/oO6qKBy8iQX19/d1337xVDMCb0?invite=cr-MSxvVWcsNDMwMjA5NTgs Any extra information: Within the sit his reasoning was because he "Was giving weapons to security as a quartermaster and that was his job" He also said he could not give orders to security because there was a SFC in D block (Whom he outranks) despite having his name set to his security name. I was advised by another staff member to make this report as well. Edited June 17, 2022 by Its Buck RETIRED SCP-RP:Delta-5 CPT | Deputy Head G9| Medical DHFW Doctor. | E11 1LT | Head Ranger | D4 Vanguard FF5 | RnD EOI V3 Canibal ImperialRP: MC 1LT Bacon 3817 | DT SGT FF5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Fizz-y Soda Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 Report him to his hcmd. -support Don't think warn is needed. Branch punishments seem better fit. CI CMDR / CA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATLAS2130 Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 3 minutes ago, [GL] Fizz-y Soda said: Report him to his hcmd. -support Don't think warn is needed. Branch punishments seem better fit. this isn't a high command problem this more of senior command problem fizzy +support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Operator Houston Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 25 minutes ago, ATLAS2130 said: this isn't a high command problem this more of senior command problem fizzy +support also RDM is more of a staff issue than a branch issue. security command should be aware of this as well though. + support Current: CI Military Private, Junior Maintenance Former: Nu-7 DHFTO 2LT, Delta-5 WO, Research Supervisor, RRH Analyst Alpha 19, SCP-RP Event Team Member, SCP-RP Senior Moderator Jetstream Sam Enthusiast | Gloveless Individual Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowPL Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 2 hours ago, Caroline said: also RDM is more of a staff issue than a branch issue. security command should be aware of this as well though. + support SCP-RP | Maintenance Expert | HLPR Bot bT5 | Senior Researcher | Senior Event Team Member Custom Classes | Umbrella Corporation Operative "Pathos" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nydekore Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 -Support RDM | It’s not RDM, he didn’t have an escort and therefore his dclass should be terminated and him likely arrested. It’s expected that research get escorts BEFORE dclass FailRP | Security can refuse researchers escorts Former: Deputy Head of Research | MTF Nu-7 Captain x2 | SCPRP Super Admin | MTF O-1 Major Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gyara Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, Nydekore said: -Support RDM | It’s not RDM, he didn’t have an escort and therefore his dclass should be terminated and him likely arrested. It’s expected that research get escorts BEFORE dclass FailRP | Security can refuse researchers escorts Edited June 17, 2022 by Gyara Former Nu7 Command Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drago Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 1 hour ago, Nydekore said: -Support RDM | It’s not RDM, he didn’t have an escort and therefore his dclass should be terminated and him likely arrested. It’s expected that research get escorts BEFORE dclass FailRP | Security can refuse researchers escorts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trizium Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 1 hour ago, Nydekore said: -Support RDM | It’s not RDM, he didn’t have an escort and therefore his dclass should be terminated and him likely arrested. It’s expected that research get escorts BEFORE dclass FailRP | Security can refuse researchers escorts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chineseman Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 -support Clearly not a RDM situation since the researcher just walk and grab the d class which obuisly not the job for them its the job for security . The player who was using maynard or every researcher should know and ask for a d class and the security NCO or CMD ATM will be looking at the amount of d class and the security will decide if he can do the test or no. Reason by allowing 1 security to escort may remove a partial force that can help to defend d block to prevent d class to escape since thats the job in security which best case ever you should either ask MTF, RIS and RIG for that purpose and researchers need to know and i belive they should analize the area by looking how many security personnel are guarding d block and they should know that they cant provide escort if they are understaff. Security can kill every d class taken by researcher with out a escort and leave d block so yeah thats the basic thing. CURRENT RANKS SCPRP: NoneRetired E-11 COL and EX GENSEC MAJ CHAD WITH GOLDENPAN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pills Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 2 hours ago, Nydekore said: -Support RDM | It’s not RDM, he didn’t have an escort and therefore his dclass should be terminated and him likely arrested. It’s expected that research get escorts BEFORE dclass FailRP | Security can refuse researchers escorts If these the rules then yeah Former: 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐃𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 - 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K I W I Posted June 18, 2022 Share Posted June 18, 2022 (edited) 10 hours ago, Nydekore said: -Support RDM | It’s not RDM, he didn’t have an escort and therefore his dclass should be terminated and him likely arrested. It’s expected that research get escorts BEFORE dclass FailRP | Security can refuse researchers escorts -Support It doesn't say this in the MOTD under security/research section for some reason but the general consensus for GENSEC and MTF is that if a researcher has a D-Class with no escort then the D-Class is KOS, unless this is incorrect and just a wide spread false understanding. HOWEVER it is metagame to refuse Dr. Maynard a escort just because they're Dr. Maynard. A reason should be stated for why Gensec/MTF is refusing to escort a researcher, in the clip it's Code Black so the MTF has reason other than the one stated but he's not really in a position to handle Securities job if he's on a MTF job Edited June 18, 2022 by K I W W I | EX CI General | | Ex Lead Admin | | The best Fruit to exist | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief_ Posted June 18, 2022 Share Posted June 18, 2022 Denied Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts