Cammy Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Your In-game: Trooper Captain Cammy 1H05 Your SteamID:STEAM_1:0:155805502 The admin's name in-game: WIll The admin's steam name (If you know it): N/A What warning did you receive RDA / Fail RP Evidence of the warn (REQUIRED):At the bottom Why do you think this warn was false: No sit , Couldn't here the guy cause of ts plus Will said ive to appeal it Any extra information: Will took me to a sit and said i could appeal it as i explained myself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soulness Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 (edited) +support false warn no sit was started will should know to start a sit if someone did something wrong. warned out of nowhere only one sided story Edited February 21, 2020 by soulness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head of Staff Will Posted February 22, 2020 Head of Staff Share Posted February 22, 2020 (edited) +Support Cammy and Soulness had ignored the requests of an individual to go to court and had even drove right past the "court house" in the DOC parking lot. Since I had been spectating it (seeing that I was over by DOC/state base at the time), I determined that it was both FailRP and RDA and issued a warning accordingly. It is a valid warning, however I decided +support this appeal so long as he looks at chat/ reads adverts and is able to hear in-game audio going forward. Upon reviewing the warning with him and the person that was arrested, I decided that this should be reduced to a verbal warning. Edited February 22, 2020 by Will (WTLM2013) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaRealCheez Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 +support I was getting arrested for evaiding and i asked for a court hearing and cammy didnt hear me but will warned without a sit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cornthecanadian Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 (edited) +Support Staff member agrees that it should be removed Edited February 22, 2020 by Cornthecanadian Changed "False" to "should be removed" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RicoTheGoat Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 22 minutes ago, Cornthecanadian said: +Support Staff member agrees that it should be removed 1 hour ago, Will (WTLM2013) said: +Support Cammy and Soulness had ignored the requests of an individual to go to court and had even drove right past the "court house" in the DOC parking lot. Since I had been spectating it (seeing that I was over by DOC/state base at the time), I determined that it was both FailRP and RDA and issued a warning accordingly. It is a valid warning, however I decided +support this appeal so long as he looks at chat/ reads adverts and is able to hear in-game audio going forward. Upon reviewing the warning with him and the person that was arrested, I decided that this should be reduced to a verbal warning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Sanchez Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 + Support. Because there was no sit and Will told him to appeal it. Why would you warn someone without being told both sides of the story? Especially because you weren’t involved. Cammy didn’t hear the person asking for a trial and so assumed that he didn’t want one as it prolongs the process of being arrested and most people don’t want that. This warn was unfair, even if it was a legitimate warn, a sit still should have been made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head of Staff Will Posted February 22, 2020 Head of Staff Share Posted February 22, 2020 Just now, Rick Sanchez said: + Support. Because there was no sit and Will told him to appeal it. Why would you warn someone without being told both sides of the story? Especially because you weren’t involved. Cammy didn’t hear the person asking for a trial and so assumed that he didn’t want one as it prolongs the process of being arrested and most people don’t want that. This warn was unfair, even if it was a legitimate warn, a sit still should have been made. The issue is that Cammy should have been able to hear in-game audio if he is on a government job, especially when he is arresting someone. Please also note that he drove past a fairly large court like area in the parking lot of DOC and claimed he did not see 2 or more adverts saying a judge was online. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Sanchez Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Will (WTLM2013) said: The issue is that Cammy should have been able to hear in-game audio if he is on a government job, especially when he is arresting someone. Please also note that he drove past a fairly large court like area in the parking lot of DOC and claimed he did not see 2 or more adverts saying a judge was online. I do understand what you mean by him being able to hear audio as it is quite important also if soulness was there it does confuse me how neither of them heard multiple requests, but I still feel the lack of sit is an issue as well, not just the warning because this wouldn’t even exist if you did that. But this isn’t a report against you so I guess that is irrelevant. Would probably be best to keep this to +\- supports so if you want to reply to this, feel free the DM me in any form of communication Edited February 22, 2020 by Rick Sanchez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hannah Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 49 minutes ago, Rick Sanchez said: + Support. Because there was no sit and Will told him to appeal it. Why would you warn someone without being told both sides of the story? Especially because you weren’t involved. Cammy didn’t hear the person asking for a trial and so assumed that he didn’t want one as it prolongs the process of being arrested and most people don’t want that. This warn was unfair, even if it was a legitimate warn, a sit still should have been made. SWAT PVT Hannah XR39-CPL Hannah King XC65 - Hannah King Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sion Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 5 hours ago, Rick Sanchez said: + Support. Because there was no sit and Will told him to appeal it. Why would you warn someone without being told both sides of the story? Especially because you weren’t involved. Cammy didn’t hear the person asking for a trial and so assumed that he didn’t want one as it prolongs the process of being arrested and most people don’t want that. This warn was unfair, even if it was a legitimate warn, a sit still should have been made. 'you may see my struggle, but you won't see me quit' 'Success depends on the second letter' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonto Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 22 hours ago, Will (WTLM2013) said: +Support Cammy and Soulness had ignored the requests of an individual to go to court and had even drove right past the "court house" in the DOC parking lot. Since I had been spectating it (seeing that I was over by DOC/state base at the time), I determined that it was both FailRP and RDA and issued a warning accordingly. It is a valid warning, however I decided +support this appeal so long as he looks at chat/ reads adverts and is able to hear in-game audio going forward. Upon reviewing the warning with him and the person that was arrested, I decided that this should be reduced to a verbal warning. Retired PD Major | Long Time GL Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronin Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 22 hours ago, Will (WTLM2013) said: +Support Cammy and Soulness had ignored the requests of an individual to go to court and had even drove right past the "court house" in the DOC parking lot. Since I had been spectating it (seeing that I was over by DOC/state base at the time), I determined that it was both FailRP and RDA and issued a warning accordingly. It is a valid warning, however I decided +support this appeal so long as he looks at chat/ reads adverts and is able to hear in-game audio going forward. Upon reviewing the warning with him and the person that was arrested, I decided that this should be reduced to a verbal warning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayden Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 +Support Staff member believes that it should be reduced to a verbal warning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Alpha Posted February 22, 2020 Share Posted February 22, 2020 12 minutes ago, Jayden said: +Support Staff member believes that it should be reduced to a verbal warning. Ex - CWRP Admin Alpha| Ex - Clone General Alpha| "All of you chumps are gonna bow, when I whoop him. All of ya! I know you got him, I know you got him picked...But the man's in trouble. I'mma show YOU how GREAT I AM!" -Muhammad Ali Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lite Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 +support Mistakes happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 13 hours ago, Jayden said: +Support Staff member believes that it should be reduced to a verbal warning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL]MyanDaBeast Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Accepted Go into the ban panel (at the top it says ban) sign in, go to your profile, go to your warn and click appeal. Fill the information out and in the description put the link to this in it. PoliceRP I Head Admin I PD: Colonel I Retired SWAT Commander I Deputy Sheriff I ImperialRP I Retired Grand Inquisitor I 47th Battalion I Chimaera Legion I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts