Shin

What in the absolute goddamn fuckery of the lord and savior, Jesus Christ, is this literal atrocious abomination?

+SUPPORT Had no issues with this man. Great application! I trust that he does has experience as staffing. Question 1 answer kinda throws me off because you didn’t specify who would initiate the ban. In my opinion, that is what I really look for. But from all the positive sides that I am stating, all of it negates one bad thing.

+Support I've been given a tour of Site-05, I would say, keep some aspects of LCZ like Janitorial/Technical spawn. I would want HCZ to stay the same and D-Block to stay the same. And then EZ to stay the same and as well as Surface.

+support cazcool

Yo mom

+Support BruhPlant

Your In-game: ShinSpin Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:511647189 The admin's name in-game: MP SFTO NCS Walter Scott The admin's steam name (If you know it): [GL] RedSpeeds What did the admin do: Basically, Walter Scott was loading ingame, his playermodel was blocking the door way of D-Block cells and this happens very often. My friend, Styx, had to shoot him basically for him to move out of the spawn. I would've recommended calling staff to avoid something like this happening again. But the real problem is: Walter flagged onto staff to see who shot him using logs, he found out it was styx, he brought styx to the staff room and warned him for ARDM. Practically taking his own sit. Evidence of the abusive action(s) (REQUIRED): https://medal.tv/clips/63189168/d1337NfliKR9 Excuse my horrible mic, medal records it and then records my mic for gmod. I talked to Walter Scott about it and he gave me his answer, practically admitting that he took his own sit, kinda? If it is hard to read for yall: "MP SFTO NCS Walter Scott brought stxy" After finding out it was styx who shot him, he brought styx to the staff room. Styx is then warned by Walter Scott and is returned by Walter Scott What do you believe should happen to the admin: Striked for taking his own sit. Any extra information: I am doing this on my friend, stxy's behalf. He has made a warn appeal for it. And with as much evidence I gotten, I feel like I should make a staff report for this.

+supper

+SUPPORT Yo like, he can be a mute HPLR Bot.

What are you suggesting? - SCPS / Maintenance / Field Experts / Combat Engineers must advert that they are either in a process of fixing a door or have successfully broken a door which means they are OOC. How would this change better the server? - First of all, I'm am looking for everyone's opinion on this. I've experienced this before and many players have as well. But my enlisteds have called sits to fix broken doors or checkpoints. And then it takes a while for staff to flag on or take the sit in general. While they are waiting for staff to come, either CI or an SCP comes and takes their life, leaving them unable to fix it because of the sit not being taken. Same thing goes for SCPs. When SCPs have successfully broken a door, staff may not take the report for a while, which leads to MTF being able to identify their location, group up and recontain that SCP easily all because the report wasn't taken. And then the door meant to be broken won't be considered broken due to the sit being taken too late. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - This would honestly put a wait timer for everyone that wants to RP, even the people who called the sit. And there would definitely be some players exploiting this rule to avoid being killed. Who would this change mostly benefit? - SCPs/Maintenance/Field Experts/ Combat Engineers Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - Examples: Maintenance fixing doors: "/advert [OOC] Fixing a door, I called staff. Don't shoot." SCPs successfully breaking a door: "/advert [OOC] Broke a door, calling staff right now. Don't shoot."

+SUPPORT My man speed ran Maintenance Expert.

Here is the clip of what I reported Banner for. Not gonna leave my opinion but just send the clip for more context. https://medal.tv/clips/62894057/d1337gO5DCfl Edit: Im an idiot and didn't see the clip link in Banner's report. Please disregard this comment then.

+Support Not active that much but can be trusted with this whitelist.

That is in fact true, but in this scenario, we still put you up as a Trial-Moderator, and still, you cannot administer bans.

-SUPPORT Trial-Moderators are not able to ban players. So you probably need to reread the staff handbook. Could you give a screenshot of your 3 warns to maybe change my opinion in the future. You didn't have to answer all 4 questions but I'm not gonna change my opinion because of something like that. I've never talked to you that much but you were given a verbal warning for Player Diss in RnD. I know this was like almost a month ago but I don't know if you have changed or not from the verbal warning. Honestly, staffing isn't really all about grinding the quota and administering punishments in my opinion. You also are there to help and assist new players that require help. And I see nothing about that on Question 13 so yeah, that is why I'm leaning towards to -Support. I get that your answers aren't supposed to be perfect. Just giving my opinion.

This would be a thing for the forums diplomats most definitely since this wasn't taken place ingame.

Yeah, the slay command given to moderators is WAY TOO RISKY.

-SUPPORT Have never seen you before. Only 1 post on the forums which is currently this post. So clearly, you have not put any effort into interacting with the community. Did not answer the questions on the applications so incorrectly done his application. There are so many sentences about "I am a good mod." That I lost count. Kind of important to me is your grammar.

As someone who passes by in Medbay all the time, this man, is definitely the only man I’ve seen the most. His first time in Medical was a bit off, but he matured his way through and can now prove himself to be a competent medical! Hope you get accepted into Medical Command! +SUPPORT

+Support (Be more careful next time) I'll say my thing and go on. Next time, D4s shouldn't try to do things like that again. Just a few hours ago, I had a minor issue with a certain D4 stealing someone's hemostats (I know IFA kits aren't in the server anymore). But still, the man bought them for himself and seeing a D4 stealing things and thinking he can get away with it because he is a D4 is not an excuse. With the ACM, never had issues with him but he can get a bit too excited and it isn't that good.

Before I give my opinion, could you fix the format? Kinda confusing to see you answer when the questions aren't there.

See here, if you restrict it to ME, a new Maintenance class would have to be created. And what I think is just calling Event Team/ Staff to just help in general. -Support It really isn't needed to be honest.

With the new branch updates implemented, MTF and Security just got buffed to the maximum with stronger guns. With FE getting Aug A3 and Nova. Behemoth being allowed in D-Block. And Heavies getting the honey badger. And wardens getting more health/armor. Honestly, I would leave this alone as a perk for D-Class. Legit people with 100% health and 10 damage per hit weapons cannot defeat an OFC with that. And then you got higher and buffer classes from the new Branch update for Donator(Expert and Pro Class-D) classes and Custom classes. I’m gonna leave a -SUPPORT

After I've done some stuff, I've talked to a staff who also saw the penis prop. I talked to him if he was able to get a screenshot of it because he himself witnessed it as well. I only dealt with the warn and went on with my day. Unfortunately, he deleted it himself with the toolgun. https://gyazo.com/8a6822d6911e6e0709652588fb2ec5ca Whatever happens now, I will not hold a grudge towards.

Keep in mind, just because it was the colored differently, doesn't mean he didn't make it. I saw his name on the props I saw, and I warned him for it. There is also a possibility of someone with a tool gun that colored it as well. But if I may have warned the wrong guy, then that is on me.