Nydekore

Coding this himself would take Coltable a while. However, I do think that this idea would be worthwhile. +Support if Coltable thinks he could figure it out

https://gaminglight.com/bans/player/76561199043445537 Unfortunately, it has not been two years. -Support, you have multiple hefty offenses on your record and then lied about the extent of time you have been banned. Only 1 week between saying a homophobic slur and going on to do mass racism? If you loved the community that would've never come to mind.

+Support Damn, CI RCT? Give this man his whitelist already Hoovy! Nah but for real, he's a LTCOL, very trusted and cool guy overall.

Now this report is interesting because, as far as I can tell, Nice was not the one handling the sit, it was Avalon who was. I think he should have steered away from advising a staff member who was involved in a sit, however all staff have opinions and I don't think it's necessarily wrong to weigh in on evidence provided. I would probably not actively support it either, however, to avoid situations like this. -Support, I'd say give him a verbal at worst for this.

-Support Neither you nor ZJ look good in this situation. I would argue that you both should be rather ashamed of yourselves, two COMMAND MEMBERS, bickering like children. Come on Flixy, you're staff now, you shouldn't be causing these types of issues.

A quick reminder that any SCMD applicant is automatically additionally considered for a low command position, thus there would be no reason to make a separate application. Just wanted to clear this up.

Too late, you'll find someone else

+Support, he has been staff before (much to certain people's dismay https://streamable.com/2bqhgv, lmao) and he has been a great DoRS, I think he would excel on the staff team.

Bruh, I'm kidnapping you. You're our researcher now, say goodbye to PRP and hello to SCPRP.

-Support Overall, I think there needs to be far less combat oriented situations (GOI raids/SCP breaches) right now to help RP branches actually RP. However, I doubt this stems from sarkic as they are far more rare.

Please fix the formatting on this, it makes it very hard to comprehend when its written like this

In-Game Name: Nydekore Steam Name: [GL] Nydekore SteamID: STEAM_0:1:114460542 What is your discord username (Ex: Jayden#9452): Nydekore#7253 What is your staff rank in Gaminglight? Senior Admin How often are you on Teamspeak? Every day or every other day, depending on the week How often do you use Discord? I check Discord ever couple hours on a typical day. Why would you like to be a member of the Support Team? (150 word minimum) I would like to join the support team to help those that need assistance with any issues they see/have in Discord or Teamspeak. While I love dealing with in-game sits, being able to also assist with other issues could be a new experience for me because, while I've done Discord moderation and other such "support" roles, I think the scale GL support members do it on is far greater due to the size of the community. Helping people to receive the proper experience they are entitled to within this wonderful community would be a great way of also getting to interact with people in a way I haven't really worked in before as I've never had a "real" job, so working in more of a "customer care" type of position would be a good way to take some further steps into the kind of experience I have so far missed out on, which teach valuable lessons that I would be able to utilize in a career in the future. How would you greet someone that has a problem in one of our tickets, or support channels? "Hello there, my name is Nydekore and I will be your support agent for today, how may I assist you?"

-Support Its up to your branch to reward trainers, not the server staff.

DoRS Sixx

+Support Level 75 for what it was would not be a good requirement, this looks good

+Support Looks good! Have fun with it

Individual SMT decide the rules per server, it doesn’t necessarily need to be uniformly tied server to server

This is another thing I’d like to touch on. RIS are combatants. This would make it incredibly unfair for them to be neutralized (heck, worse, forced to work together with) in a roll off by someone that they don’t even know is their enemy. That’d be like letting a stealth op come up behind a CI and roll to see if they’re instantly killed. The only way I’d be even slightly okay with this suggestion is 1. Harsher roll guidelines and 2. Making it like brainwash RP where the RIS must consent to it (because I and many others do not enjoy actively counteracting our own branches because someone rolled well)

-Support Would be able to stump entire CI raids or MTF squads just by walking up to them without them noticing

+Support Come on Weeb, you should know better at this point, you most certainly knew that you shouldn’t have had it in the first place

I feel there's a big sentiment of thinking Inaccurate should've taken other routes here instead of giving a warning. However, I believe Inaccurate was right to deliver this warning if he believed rule breaking took place. Staff aren't required to track down players through discord or whatever other means in order to get their side of the story, they should ideally be there in game. Unfortunately, ZJ wasn't there when Inaccurate took the sit so Inaccurate took the evidence and ran it as he should have. However, I believe without seeing the evidence of this case, a minor RDM warning should not be held to ZJ's record considering he, nor the rest of us, have the ability to fully see what happened. I doubt Inaccurate cares if it sticks, I doubt anyone really does. So +Support

-Support This is not where we need more RP and in many cases is mutually worse. Many SCP’s that are cuffed and heading back to their cell just log off because 1. They’re upset about being rc’d or 2. Breaching as the last thing they wanted to do for the day and now they’re going to go do something else seeing as their breach is done.

+Support but dear god stop saying it when explaining a situation. This is what caused the issue in the first place and it’s just going to cause more trouble for you in the future. Form the habit of describing the word without saying it.

+Support Looks awesome, love the D4 model (though it'll be difficult getting used to them no longer being glow sticks)

As of right now this is not intended and I would recommend bringing this up to command if you do see this. They are not meant to be first engagement in any combat scenario while escorting. However, if you do ever approach a researcher and they shoot they are well within their right to do so.