Jump to content

Coltable

Member
  • Posts

    1,321
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    33

Everything posted by Coltable

  1. Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.
  2. Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.
  3. Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.
  4. Not a Bug After looking into this, we have decided that this is an intended feature of the game and NOT a bug. If you think this should be changed in the future feel free to make a post in the suggestions section of the forums for that server.
  5. Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.
  6. I feel your turning a already long and stressful process tho into something worse, I mean now they gotta interact with staff even more while mt/gensec gather around scp players.
  7. I dont know if this is the right way to promote scp gameplay tho, I feel like spending time and coding better sweps/breaching systems allowing easier gameplay experience for players who are on scp's would be a better alternative for promoting play time on scps. You also stated yourself some SCP have rolepla mechanics such as 049 etc only targeting certain jobs, i think that might lead to less ppl playing on those scps for example. Also you could simply abuse the xp gain per kill, kinda the reason we dont have any money or xp gain per kill currently.
  8. Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.
  9. While id love to have another scp for the job pack, this scp seems to be overall complicated for what it needs to achieve and i dont think right now would be right time to focus our resources towards something of this magnitude.
  10. We decided to go with this play style as it promotes more dclass to work together rather than 1v1 gensec, this is the design both Site 05 and Site 10 used in all our map updates previously. In regards to the lines, the reason we like those over a huge line is exactly the player blocking mechanic, it allows for a cooling off period if the player in front of you actually wants to roleplay well you just have to wait your turn and interact with other dclass/gensec giving dblock more of an atmosphere. As for the dblock corner we honestly only removed that as I wanted to give gensec those cells as rooms where they could place dclass in holding for mtf/scps but it looks disgusting trying to keep the corner not blocked off so overall we went with just giving it to gensec and making it more “flushed” with the design. I almost forget to mention, that line on the fair side is not for dclass that is a “Drop off point” for researchers/gensec/mtf who are dropping back dclass into dblock. The reason the kos line is so far forward is exactly bc dclass aren’t meant to go in there. I’d suggest teaming up with a buddy in dblock and both of you enter either line up then select a gensec target before rushing. This is how it used to be when I was dclass main and I found it quite enjoyable and more fair for gensec/realistic.
  11. Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.
  12. this is not possible due to the system placing the players outside of the normal network/instance.
  13. Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.
  14. Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.
  15. To messy, no need to add rules ontop of something like this.
  16. Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.
  17. Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.
  18. Right now sarkic is in a good spot, we may look at giving them this feature within the future
  19. Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.
×
×
  • Create New...