Jump to content

Rhodes.

Member
  • Posts

    311
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Rhodes.

  1. Grade: (B) (85%) Test Quality: Standard Lore: 20/20: nothing wrong with lore here. Creativity: 20/20: this test idea is original, I haven't seen this test before. Presentation: 15/20: it's presented well but no pictures are present. Writing: 30/40: thought the log lacks quantity of words, the quality of the word choice is good and the small details like cheez-its are good
  2. Grade: (C) (70%) Test Quality: Standard Lore: 20/20: nothing wrong with the lore here. Creativity: 0/20: being honest this test is done very many times by too many people Presentation: 10/20: several things wrong with this document. First the SCP is 1025 not 1162, and the hypothesis is what you think the outcome of the test will be before it has been done. Writing: 40/40: although there are some things wrong with this log, the writing has minimal errors and none of which are obvious.
  3. +support if this gets added I'm leaving CI to join the military and join the engineering branch.
  4. 5000 http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-5000 for more info
  5. Grade: (A) (95%) Test Quality: Quality Lore: 20/20: Nothing wrong with the lore here Creativity: 20/20: haven't seen a test like this before Presentation: 15/20: the evidence/visual stimuli section is for pictures or videos of the test Writing: 40/40: the writing is following all grammar and capitalization rules and there is alot to read.
  6. Grade: (D) (65%) Test Quality: Sub-Standard Lore: 10/20: 008 is a prion and doesn't simply not infect anymore Creativity: 20/20: haven't seen any 008 tests like this Presentation: 15/20: although you dont have any visual stimuli everything else like the format is followed correctly Writing: 20/40: there isn't much here to read and capitalization errors are present.
  7. Grade: (D) (60%) Test Quality: Sub-Standard Lore: 20/20: Follows lore Creativity: 20/20: you were creative with what you put for the log. Presentation: 10/20: Some things you put in the wrong category such as with this section Type of response towards incident (MTF/NTF/Security/ETC) that would be for how did those sections react toward that incident, what steps did they take to contain the loose entities/class d. Also it's the classification level of SCP'S involved such as Keter and Euclid. Writing: 20/40: you get this score because of errors in your grammar such as fuckin should be fucking and your missing periods.
  8. The Hazardous Materials Researcher doesn't have access to researches radio comms [channel 3] it's classified as a research class so I don't know why it dosen't have it.
  9. [I don't know how I would grade this since it's an incident report and not a test] Grade: (C) (75%) Incident Report Quality: Standard Lore: 20/20: nothing wrong with the lore since it is a incident report Creativity: 20/20: haven't seen an incident report before. Presentation: 15/20: Format is followed but the resolution towards incident isn't filled out Writing: 20/40: there isn't much to read here and that's probably good but it needs more detail into what exactly happened during the event.
  10. Grade: (D) (65%) Test Quality: Sub-Standard Lore: 20/20: nothing wrong with the lore here. Creativity: 15/20: haven't really seen this test before, although it's probably been done multiple times. Presentation: 10/20: the format isn't fully followed, there are missing parts such as the analysis and conclusion and the picture at the end isn't needed use F5 to take screenshots of the game. Writing: 20/40: the test log doesn't have much to read, try adding more details in the next one.
  11. Grade: (D) (65%) Test Quality: Sub-Standard Lore: 20/20: nothing wrong with the lore here Creativity: 10/20: this test is done by a lot of JR's as they try to go through the ranks. Presentation: 15/20: The format is followed but for the visual stimuli it means like pictures or other visual images of the test. Writing: 20/40: the test doesn't have much to read, but there are no obvious spelling or grammar errors.
  12. Score: 95/100 Grade: A (Quality) Lore: 15/20: the reason for this score is because Class-D personnel are given Class-A amnestics when inducted into foundation hands, thus they have no recollection of their prior life before the foundation Creativity: 20/20: This test is an interesting idea I haven't seen any attempted organ replacement tests with 1162 before Presentation: 20/20: the log is presented nice and easy to read with the format working well with the test logs. Writing: 40/40: There is a lot to read with small attention to detail and word choice. Thus the 40 had been given
  13. + support YAY MORE JOBS Also what ranks would be able to access these jobs?
  14. Grade: (D) (68%) Test Quality: I would grade this test Sub-standard Lore: 20/20: I see nothing wrong with the lore here. Creativity: 18/20: this is an interesting idea and creative at that, but not creative enough. Presentation: 10/20: the format is followed but no pictures or videos is present F5 for screenshots Writing: 20/40: not very much detail presented here, and it's pretty short
  15. Grade: (C) (73%) Test Quality: I would grade this test a Standard quality Lore: 20/20: nothing wrong with the lore here Creativity: 18/20: very creative idea. I haven't yet seen this test. Presentation: 15/20: the presentation is good could use more pictures and logs like audio logs. Writing: 20/40: the length of the log has brought the grade down significantly, try to make longer next time.
  16. Grade: (A) (90%) Test Quality: I would grade this test quality Lore: 20/20: I see nothing wrong with the lore here. Creativity: 20/20: it's a very creative idea not commonly seen Presentation: 20/20: it's presented well and neatly Writing: 30/40: it's detailed but not very long, could've done more writing.
  17. Grade: (A) (97%) Test Quality: I would grade this test a quality test Lore: 20/20: I see nothing wrong with the lore here Creativity: 17/20: this is a creative idea and isnt presented much, although it has been done before. Presentation: 20/20: the test log is very presentable, has pictures and is neat and organized Writing: 40/40: the test log is detailed and has lots of parts to it to read.
  18. Grade: (D) (60%) Test Quality: I would grade this year a Sub-standard Lore: 20/20: I see nothing wrong with the lore for this test. Creativity: 5/20: almost everyone thinks about doing this test and quite often you'll hear it around LCZ being said. Presentation: 15/20: The format was followed and that's all about it I can say about the presentation part of it. Writing: 20/40: the log was there isn't a lot of writing to go off of to understand what the test was like. It's cut short.
  19. Krezzer let command determine the quality and do their thing ok?
  20. Krezzer really. You Rick rolled me.
  21. Lore name: Cancer  Give a brief description of your character: I am a dedicated researcher that will go head first into any task given and try to accomplish it by any means necessary. (And I mean any) 1. You have been tasked by the administration to enter Site-05 for the investigation of a supposed infiltrator. This infiltrator may or may not be an active anti-meme and reality-bender. I would start by individually putting each person in the facility including class d in a fight or flight situation to see if they exhibit any reality bender or anti-meme traits. If no one exhibits those traits I will do blood tests on all foundation personnel and class d to determine if their in the foundation system or not. 2. After a series of inquiries and unfortunate events relating to this anti-meme; The infiltrator has convinced the foundation you are in-fact the anti-meme; A death warrant is put on your head. How would you deal with this scenario? I would firstly start by finding the anti-meme person and kill them and also post memes around the facility to prove my pro-meme stance. 3. An entity representing a GOI has opened up a portal to a negotiation location. They are demanding the foundation give them several SCP's for termination; Or they will release key redacted information to the general public. You are sent to negotiate on behalf of research along with a representative of MTF. How would you go along negotiating with this entity and what would be your opening proposal? I would have mock SCP's that are as close as possible taken along with me and request that the data be transferred to us so they don't have it if that plan fails I will also have MTF teams on standby in order to forcefully get the data back. I will also have large scale amnestics on standby if they release the data to erase the memory of the public ever seeing the data.
  22. Basically that with a key card entrance.
  23. 1. Name of the SCP you would like added: SCP-5000 2. Link(s) to playermodels: none needed while wearing 3. Link(s) to sweps: any invisibility swep works 4. How much health/armor do you think it should have? It should have 200/200 5. Why should we add this SCP? It adds more SCP's for research to test on 6. Basic summary of the SCP: SCP-5000 is a non-functional mechanical suit identified within its internal schematics as an 'Absolute Exclusion Harness' designed by the SCP Foundation. Although SCP-5000 is believed to have once possessed a number of anomalous functions intended to protect and benefit its occupant. When SCP-5000 is worn everyone around it doesn't recognize that they see said person wearing the suit, hense the person is invisible 7. Extra information: http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-5000 for more info on the SCP
×
×
  • Create New...