Phillers

Yea this thing literally beats guns in most engagements. It's the christmass hammer all over.

Imagine not being able to put your weapon away after being specifically warned to do it. #Buff912

+Support for RDM -Support for LTAP/Metagame. He RDM'd, that much is clearly proven. However, LTAP only applies (In my opinion) if the person is aware that they are about to be brought into a staff sit. I think that Ruz being aware of this is possible but not certain, because of that I don't think he should catch a ban for that. "The self defense clause is satisfied by observing CI personnel, D-Class or SCPs attack other non-combatants or being attacked themselves." Still cannot attack them for that sadly.

-Support. If this is what you do on a bad day, I don't even want to know you on a good one.

+Support. Peeps abusing vents cause SCP's can't enter them is dumb. (Why can't most SCP's enter them anyways? like 682&939 I understand, but the smaller ones should be able to!)

+Support. I would greatly enjoy no longer needing to dump a full mag into someone to kill them.

+Support. However, not for this fully being removed. Rather, I believe this should be left to HCMD to figure out between themselves instead of everything being ruled by MOTD.

+Support if that is truly what happened. That's a bit of an excessive thing to ban for. Yea so that is NOT the only thing that happened. Enjoy the ban mate.

Did this get changed or something? We had logs for tranq's in the past, it's just listed as an M9.

Love the idea, not sure how possible it'd be coding wise though.

-Support. I know where you got the idea from. I feel the need to inform you that that server's spying system (And Job/Chat system) is very different compared to what we are currently using here. Their system allows for proper usage of this, but ehre it would just be a small and frankly not-needed change.

ACCESSING DOCUMENT. . . #[1596]-ALPHA USER CLEARANCE LEVEL: [ALPHA] ACCESS GRANTED. UPLOADING ATTATCHEMENT... <...> ATTATCHMENT UPLOADED DISPLAYING FILE. . . ╱▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔╲____________ ► [GRADING_ATTATCHMENT] ◄ ⠀╲_________________╱⠀⎯ ⠀❐⠀ ⤬⠀╲________________ ╲__________________________________________________________________╱| ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔╲⠀⠀•⠀⠀▼⠀⠀•⠀⠀╱▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔ >> Overall Grade << [100/100] >> Efficiency << [25/25] [Torture only applied when needed, no wasted questions.] >> Insight << [25/25] [You figured out something new! We will have to learn more about these "Covert Agents"] >> Presentation << [25/25] [The blue is much better then the Red!] >> Writing << [25/25] [No major grammatical errors that I could find during my read, and it read nicely.] >> Notes / Notices << [Nice Format, Good effort, Good interrogation.]

I mean, wrong section but like. Are you really pulling IRL laws into a GMOD server?

-Support. Nothing against E11, but some of the things here are simply not needed IMO. The rust weapons. Why not simply buff existing ones? Or change to existing weapons? Why add new ones? The medic gun is simply odd to me. Why give a more powerfull healing tool to a branch that is not dedicated to healing. Give that sorta stuff to Medical, not E11. Everything else is fine by me tho.

ACCESSING DOCUMENT. . . #[0330]-ALPHA2 USER CLEARANCE LEVEL: [ALPHA] ACCESS GRANTED. UPLOADING ATTATCHEMENT... <...> ATTATCHMENT UPLOADED DISPLAYING FILE. . . ╱▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔╲____________ ► [GRADING_ATTATCHMENT] ◄ ⠀╲_________________╱⠀⎯ ⠀❐⠀ ⤬⠀╲________________ ╲__________________________________________________________________╱| ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔╲⠀⠀•⠀⠀▼⠀⠀•⠀⠀╱▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔ >> Overall Grade << [100/100] >> Lore << [25/25] [While ofcourse there is no specific lore to back this up, I would like to think that this is how the SCP would react in such a scenario.] >> Creativity << [25/25] [Using 330 as poison is certainly a new take on things.] >> Presentation << [25/25] [Looking fancy.] >> Writing << [25/25] [No major grammatical errors that I could find during my read, and it read nicely.] >> Notes / Notices << [Can't wait till we get to poison some SA with candy.]

Now, usually whenever a staff member requests a ban from an Admin in the Staff discord, they'll also send in a screenshot showing that said player did infact disconnect and did not simply crash. That didn't happen this time. So my real question here is to @Pills. Did you check if he infact DC'd and didn't just crash?

Kinda cringe ngl. Cya again in what, 2 months?

ACCESSING DOCUMENT. . . #[1025]-ALPHA USER CLEARANCE LEVEL: [ALPHA] ACCESS GRANTED. UPLOADING ATTATCHEMENT... <...> ATTATCHMENT UPLOADED DISPLAYING FILE. . . ╱▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔╲____________ ► [GRADING_ATTATCHMENT] ◄ ⠀╲_________________╱⠀⎯ ⠀❐⠀ ⤬⠀╲________________ ╲__________________________________________________________________╱| ▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔╲⠀⠀•⠀⠀▼⠀⠀•⠀⠀╱▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔▔ >> Overall Grade << [97/100] >> Efficiency << [25/25] [Straight to the point questions, no waste here.] >> Insight << [25/25] [More information regarding special forces is always welcome within RND.] >> Presentation << [23/25] [Looks great, however please do not use red on dark-green. It becomes quite hard to read that way.] >> Writing << [25/25] [No major grammatical errors that I could find during my read, and it read nicely.] >> Notes / Notices << [Overall, I enjoyed the read and appreciate you having been able to do this while under the stress that you were at the time. Good job!]

This suggestion is already a thing.

Honestly this won't become more of a problem then it already is currently.

+support. The argument I hear against this is always "But if it's more then 2 lives people will overwhelm themselves!" and honestly I think that is a very childish way to look at things. People playing on this server are not in kindergarden, they can manage their own time and dictate for themselves how many branches they are comfortable with being in.

+Support. Another Phill in ET? Better get ETL man, otherwise you'll be the worse one.

I said above that I would edit the original post, however due to it's length that is no longer possible, because of that I will simply be posting edits here instead. EDIT 1 : In regards to Savage's points below : 1. As I believe I made abundantly clear in the initial posting, I could not tell that you were joking. In general, when people say "I don't give a fuck" they are not joking, they are being insulting. The matter that you are L4 personnel is moot, there is no distinction between L1 and L4 personnel asfar as Nu7 SOP or 912 MOTD is concerned. As for me cuffing you after the door was closed, I had already begun arresting you by this point. Irregardless, it was the other door I was refrencing, as I said above. 2. Lots of people do leave doors open for a tactical advantage, that much I agree with. I generally leave those people alone. Savage however, was not doing so. He opened the first door, then walked off into D-Block through the 2nd door and started B-Hopping. That was not done for any type of tactical advantage, and anyone will have a hard time arguing that fact. Certainly since this is D-Block door Savage is reffering to, a door that even GENSEC OFC's know should always be closed, unless there is a firing line right outside of it. 3. I wouldn't know if there actually was a staff member in Ts3 at that time. However, judging of the fact that they both only heard Savage's side of the story, was not the staff member that took the sit, and I presume not a member of JMT/SMT, their opinion is moot here. 4. I believe this is nitpicking words, as in general when the rules say "Event" they mean one hosted by ET. But even in the case that this statement is correct, the event in question would have been me arresting you. I was not minging in that regard, as I was simply following my MOTD prescribed guidelines. Unless the argument here is that Savage B-Hopping through D-Block was the event, which I doubt. 5. MOTD States that 912 can arrest rule-breakers. There are only 2 types of rules on the server, MOTD, or SOP. If 912 can arrest for SOP Violations : Savage broke the SOP. If 912 can arrest for MOTD Violations : MOTD States that you have to follow SOP (Rule 2, General rules) which Savage broke. Either way, I am permitted to arrest the individual who broke SOP. 6. This argument is just another loop of argument 1&2, read there to see my response of it. 7. I was not ordering Savage, I was alerting him that he violated an SOP rule which would result in his arrest. My reasoning for arrest was the SOP violation. My reasoning for arrest was not him failing to follow any order to close the door, as I never gave such an order. Also, apologies in advance to the Forums Diplomat who is inevitably going to take a look at this at some point, I think this will be a bit of a clutter. Also, Savage, I think this was really just a misunderstanding caused by an unclearly written rule. We can just drop this, as frankly I don't think this is worth your time.