Jump to content

Basing rule suggestion. - Accepted - In Progress - Completed


Iancompallo

Recommended Posts

What you want to see? - All fading doors for base defense need to be owned by the same person

Why should we add it? - I have experienced  people making bases very difficult to raid by making the fading doors defending the base all owned by a separate family members.

What are the advantages of having this? - Will allow raids to be completed in a more realistic way as criminals wouldn't be able to abuse the game mechanics. 

Who is it mainly for? - Government

Links to any content - N/A

Edited by Iancompallo

Current: Resigned 

Former: SCU Low Command (LT) - SRT LCPL - DOC PROB COPD Low Command (CPT) FBI Low Command (DAD) - Moderator (PRP)

-Orin 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+Support
I think this is a great suggestion. It would make it easier to raid and makes sense to have this rule. 

 Retired PRP - FBI Chief of Staff | FTO Training Director | USMS Deputy Marshal | HRT Captain

PD Sergeant Major

Ex PRP Senior Moderator 

20220814123045_1_13.png.01f385d214d4507ed56e2e53594103f9.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Head Admin
13 hours ago, MrgotdeLute said:

+Support
I think this is a great suggestion. It would make it easier to raid and makes sense to have this rule. 

i can agree when rushing a base and you realise that its 4 different people that own the doors kinda annoying

Signature.png

$500+ Donator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Sourg said:

+support

People use this so you have to warrant 4 people in order to use battling ram.

This is mad annoying. Since all need to own all props why don't they need to own all doors

Gaminglight:$2200+ Donations Gaminglight Legend | Community Member since April 2020

                                                               "Don’t cry because it’s over. Smile because it happened.” – Dr. Seuss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Sourg said:

+support

People use this so you have to warrant 4 people in order to use battling ram.

 

                                                              Former USMS DMAR || CC Owner || Bingus 4 life 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Head Admin

+Support

Not an issue typically, but a clarification should be added to make things less complex for government attempting to get warrants (can be annoying especially when there is a president on having to wait for approval of each warrant).

ALs6j_EhXkr61kQS1B7NLXq2Y5mRM1v5siUmOqed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+support 
Waiting on a warrant for another name in the middle of a shoot out isn't fun and some presidents can take upwards of 5 minutes+ to accept a warrant. 

Previous Positions: Ex-Death Trooper | Ex- Inferno Squad Leader | Retired HRT LT | Retired FBI DCOS | Retired FBI FTO DD | Retired PD Major 

Current Positions: SRT Member spacer.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Will said:

+Support

Not an issue typically, but a clarification should be added to make things less complex for government attempting to get warrants (can be annoying especially when there is a president on having to wait for approval of each warrant).

agree with Will, would be good to clarify

That bald Aussie Guy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/6/2021 at 8:35 PM, Sourg said:

+support

People use this so you have to warrant 4 people in order to use battling ram.

^^^ slows down gov when raiding when you need to stop and get a new warrant at every door

PoliceRP Ex CERT Commander 〗〖 Last Dispatch Director 
ImperialRP Ex Second Sister 〗〖 Ex Seventh Sister 
Staff Ex PoliceRP Senior Admin 〗〖 Ex PoliceRP Senior Event Team 〗〖 Ex Senior Forums Diplomat 〗〖 Ex Support Supervisor 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...