Jump to content

PryingTree

Member
  • Posts

    525
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by PryingTree

  1. HCMD. I love you, I will miss you. Goodbye, now I die [INRP]
  2. What are you suggesting? - CI have 1-2 trash areas, in one of the rooms How would this change better the server? - We dont even use the rooms out of spawn, (The rooms like storage room) so why not make that place the trash place. It would help get some money and why not? It improves activity and it is something we can do while waiting for NLR/next raid. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - No Who would this change mostly benefit? - EOI Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A
  3. +support Hella work for the SMT and stuff... but uhhhh, good luck if you accept it I guess
  4. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Dddablfh9UFEm6_6fYfS0JWpc7Gn6G49_vDN-xVtoLs/edit?usp=sharing
  5. +support, It is a really good point to make and there is a lot of roles soon to be added with new things like these.
  6. I just did 2 hours of mining and got 1 million ( I have a low level) and I think that would be a bit op. What you should do is make it where you would get double mining money for the active hours as it rewards you escaping when there is lots of combatants. Sadly thats not what this suggestion is -support
  7. I agree with fusion, Mostly because what he said is true and because I think all that should happen is a clarification.
  8. well I mean I knew I was gonna get it anyway
  9. He also pressured me to warn him, so I did , as I didn't want my rep down. It was dumb but... anything for dat rep!! EDIT: That was worded badly, I felt pressured, so I did. He didnt FORCE me to.
  10. Your In-game Name: PryingTree Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:114592179 The admin's name in-game: caroline What warning did you receive: Formal When did you receive this warning: 9PM EST 5/14/22 Please give a description of the situation that led to the warning: I got on SCP-173 and just did my thing. I thought I knew the rules well for SCPs, as I have been previously a senior moderator, and currently I am a moderator/Forum Diplomat. Also a command member. I was speeding around when I was suppose to be using the right click on the swep. I should've known that, but it isn't stated in the MOTD. It just said "you must be holding the 173 swep at all times". What I didn't know was that you had to wait 15 seconds if there was 2 people. I thought it stacked on. For example; one person = 5 seconds, two people = 10 seconds, three people = can't move at all. So I was just moving really fast on autopilot, then I met a hallway where SCP 049 was. There was two people, a G9 with a D5. This is where I sped really fast even though I was getting looked at. Then I remembered, and was told, to stop since I was being looked at. So I did for what I thought was 10 seconds, (Which after reviewing the clip for appealing this, it was a fast 10 seconds). since I thought it was 10 seconds for two people. Then I ran after the other guy. Then after the first guy was turned into an instance of SCP-610, I ran to get the G9. He wasn't looking at me, just running, but I kept missing my shots. Then he looked back at me but I continued since he should've been dead. Why do you think this warn was false: I believe I should've gotten at least a verbal warning, I don't know why all of you think that you should remember every single rule on ever single thing. You know how many things you have to remember normally? Well over 200, that of SOPs too, as SOPs can also contradict the MOTD and combine with the MOTD if it is job specific. I didn't know because they kept changing the rules. I checked in the rule change announcements and it wasn't even there either. Not only that but this is the second time I got at least a small warn like a verbal in my year of playing this server, (at least that of my memory). So many hours. Evidence the warning is false: https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/l1VbY0kh9XU_2/d1337P0M40sG?invite=cr-MSxSN1MsNjQ3MjE3NjIs [EDITED DOWN TO 24 SECONDS INTEAD OF 2 MINUTES] EXTRA: It is worth a shot, as I can only appeal it once and I really don't like that on my record as it can mean a lot. even if the chances are 2%. I hope you all can forgive me. Have a good day.
  11. Agreed, as said, it was a lapse of judgement.
  12. Yea +support I had my reasons of warning him but now I think about it more, it was dumb. Sorry for the lapse of judgement.
  13. Thanks everyone for the +supports, currently playing SCP 8286 so I appreciate the support
  14. What are you suggesting? - Hard code other SCPs where they can't kill SCP 8286. How would this change better the server? - It would make SCP 8286 more playable, I have played 8 hours on 8286 yesterday and I died around 10 times by an SCP. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - May hinder performances but I doubt so. Who would this change mostly benefit? - SCP 8286, staff, and ET. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A
  15. +support Idk why everyone is going with fizzy, but I think you did nothing wrong. There isn't even enough evidence. You didn't know he was alting Just because you were in a group chat, doesn't mean anything.
  16. You would have to walk even more if it was at anomalous because most people do wood. and at the rate you get wood, it would just be more easy to have a seller at the wood
  17. Grade: 82/100 Lore: 20/25 Creativity: 25/25 Presentation: 19/25 Writing: 20/25 Minor capilization mistakes. Also the armor would be hella heavy.
×
×
  • Create New...