Bionicle

oh yeah btw this is just an idea in case the rules for this arent already being made

173's model is broken rn (makes the model the same one that is used when the server breaks and everyone is on joining/connecting) and swapping off of it makes models larger than they should be.

Please make sure suggestions are pertinent and relevant! What you want to see? - 173 self breaching guidelines go a lil something like this: SCP 173 should have its cell cleaned every 20 minutes by a janitor or other non-essential personnel, if no, then it attemps to find a way out of its cell (or something) for 10 minutes, and after the 10 minutes, it breaches Why should we add it? - Because it is a (mostly) lore friendly way of having self breach for 173 What are the advantages of having this? - It's just self breach guidelines that are lore friendly Who is it mainly for? - 173 Players Links to any content - N/A

i mean +/- support if you guys can use it then sure, but if it isnt used then there isnt a reason for it

+/- support, i mean there are some pluses to this, like easier use of comms, but some downsides like a voice enhancer? that could easily be abused, and higher ups are the only ones that have access to stuff like voice amp for a reason

-support, there is no system for this in place to be a thing

I thought you guys were allowed to lock it down if CI was in the immediate area (EG. at the gate/near elevator), but if not then +support

+/- support, would work well only for scps like 682 and 076-2, so im fine with them getting it

+support on the RDA, maybe a temp removal of SCP 912 for this player, but we cant do much on RDM and player diss without proof.

+support yeah i mean thats an n word

+support, i mean its obvious that this player has no regard for the rules

+Support, seems like it would help researchers out

If its possible, then it would be a good solution to fix people picking up the spear, but i dont think that it ts

+ support luger gang

I made a slight oversight in the post, i dont mind if one or two MTF are guarding, but it crosses the line when the doors are trapped like in the video. I have edited the post acoordingly

+support this is clear failRP

-support the model is so he is distinguishable from other researchers i presume, also Dr. Bright is a minge class.

Im gonna say +support but i know that it wont happen, no matter how much people want it to

Please make sure suggestions are pertinent and relevant! What you want to see? - Make setting up bombs at gates FailRP/Meta-gaming unless CI have been called out. Why should we add it? - This should be a rule because it makes no sense for a demo expert to set up a bunch of trip mines, and ruin their raid in EZ by throwing nitros and having their mines set up in the entrance. What are the advantages of having this? - It enhances RP, because in actual RP they wouldn't set up mines in an area and just hope no foundation staff go through that area. It's like setting up a bomb at a supermarket and hoping no civilians walk through it. Who is it mainly for? - CI Links to any content - N/A

yeah since when was this about CCs