Jump to content

Rookieblue

Retired Staff
  • Posts

    2,231
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    32

Everything posted by Rookieblue

  1. Application Accepted! Thank you for your application to the Forum Diplomats, your application has been approved! You will be receiving more information on onboarding onto the Forum Diplomat team via discord!
  2. Application Accepted! Thank you for your application to the Forum Diplomats, your application has been approved! You will be receiving more information on onboarding onto the Forum Diplomat team via discord!
  3. I just searched through everything and I don't see you banned from the main GL discord.
  4. Accepted Warning removed
  5. Denied Warning is valid. You ran into D-Block while being actively pursued by SCP 106. D-Block is considered a safe zone because SCP 106 can't follow into that area. Regarding your comment about 106 entering D-Block, he entered for a second to obtain your name for what I assume was the resulting sit request and then exited. He did not attack anyone, or anything of that nature. As such, no action will be taken against them.
  6. Name: Rookieblue Rank: PFC On a scale of 1-10, how active do you consider yourself to be?: 1 (Though I just got back from a LOA) Anything important we should know regarding your activity? (Work, school, etc.): Work and SMT stuff will always be a drain on my time, but now that I'm done with all the long term stuff for now, I should be back to my normal schedule.
  7. This has been suggested multiple times, and while I remain in favor of it, there are a few drawbacks. 1) As mentioned by Krieg666 this class would be extremely easy to minge with. It would need to be either locked by a high level requirement, or set as a donor SCP to at least have some quality control. 2) This would be an extreme challenge for Foundation personnel to combat mass breaches, and so there would need to be some significant rules in place to ensure some fairness for them. Your proposed rules are great starts, but the times probably have to be worked on a bit.
  8. Accepted The warning has been removed from your record. No further action is needed on your part!
  9. Accepted! Please allow up to a couple days to get unbanned from your respective discord.
  10. @Zeeptin Pinging you since you issued the ban
  11. This is the player's first appeal of this permanent ban. Pertenant bans: 03/21/2020, 21:03:00 - SCP - [GL] Chief - Homophobia | Bypassing Chat Filter 02/21/2020, 02:02:00 - SCP - [GL] Doggo - Homophobic comments, MRDM x5, RDM in a sit. Pertenant warnings: 03/22/2020, 02:28:32 - SCP - [GL] Chief - Racism | Bypassing Chat Filter This player engaged in multiple uses of homophobic slurs/comments and racial slurs within a month.
  12. Brings me back to my Mod / Senior Mod days before Utility was an actual branch and we had the Technician and Janitor jobs that anyone could hop on. I spectator anyone on that job and there was a 98% chance they would minge and exploit through checkpoints, release SCPs, murder GENSEC, etc.
  13. Already Handled Appropriately in Game
  14. Moved to correct section @ajvick0075
  15. BAN | Case [#204] Moderator: Zeeptin#2031 Time: 12/15/2020 01:53pm UTC Reason: banned for saying Gaminglight is laundering money Page 1/1
  16. That's them being lazy and just agreeing with what the original person stated.
  17. DEFERRED TO GENSEC AND RESEARCH COMMANDS RESPECTIVELY
  18. Player was blacklisted by those jobs due to the above referenced player report.
×
×
  • Create New...