Average Pipebomb enjoyer Posted November 1, 2021 Share Posted November 1, 2021 (edited) Your In-game Name: Sexmaster Mao Zedong Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:519092403 The admin's name in-game: MTF E11 DoFTO 2LT Adam AD3M What warning did you receive: Failrp When did you receive this warning: Breaking my cuffs while being unobserved by foundation staff Please give a description of the situation that led to the warning: So 912 cuffed me and since 912 does not count as foundation/CI personnel to observe you since it is classified as an SCP so i broke my cuffs Why do you think this warn was false: Well 912 does not count as foundation personnel and there was no valid evidence of me breaking my cuffs without valid evidence of actual foundation personnel observing me and the person involved with the sit intentionally wanted me warned for minor actions Evidence the warning is false: https://gyazo.com/f30b6a7b56f6800919569bbf713f837f Edited November 1, 2021 by russianweeb69 1 E11 2LT || Ex CI 2LT || Average Metal gear rising enjoyer || Ex Nu7 2LT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Other Colt Posted November 1, 2021 Share Posted November 1, 2021 5m to break out, you can't break out of cuffs if you havent been left alone for 5m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Average Pipebomb enjoyer Posted November 1, 2021 Author Share Posted November 1, 2021 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Gensec Colt said: 5m to break out, you can't break out of cuffs if you havent been left alone for 5m i was left alone since you had cuffed me AND no foundation staff near since 912 is an SCP Edited November 1, 2021 by russianweeb69 E11 2LT || Ex CI 2LT || Average Metal gear rising enjoyer || Ex Nu7 2LT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Other Colt Posted November 1, 2021 Share Posted November 1, 2021 (edited) There was also a researcher who came about 30s after cuffing you who observed you too so you could not break out in cuffs 9 minutes ago, russianweeb69 said: It was around 5 mins since you had cuffed me also the rule is while being observed by foundation staff 912 is classified as an SCP not foundation staff Edited November 1, 2021 by Gensec Colt Sent wrong log Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Average Pipebomb enjoyer Posted November 1, 2021 Author Share Posted November 1, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Gensec Colt said: There was also a researcher who came about 30s after cuffing you who observed you too so you could not break out in cuffs 11 minutes ago, russianweeb69 said: Yes who left directly after and if you read the rules on breaking cuffs it says OR not 5 minutes AND left alone Edited November 1, 2021 by russianweeb69 E11 2LT || Ex CI 2LT || Average Metal gear rising enjoyer || Ex Nu7 2LT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Some Weeb Posted November 1, 2021 Share Posted November 1, 2021 +Support Honestly (IMO) this warn should be lifted and a clarification should be placed with 912 if he counts as a foundation member watching you. 27 minutes ago, Gensec Colt said: There was also a researcher who came about 30s after cuffing you who observed you too so you could not break out in cuffs Is there any proof that back that up? SCP-RP - Former: Moderator/ET, Security SFTO SM, Research Researcher, MTF Alpha-1 Sgt, MTF Alpha-1 "Alpha-6", Noob-7 Cpl, D5 RCT, R&D SIN, T-2 Blackjack, HFR, DHBI and E-11 DoFTO HCE SM | Current: CI Military DHLS SFTO SM Imperial-RP - Former - Moderator, Royal Guard Senior Guard, Shadow Guard Lead, Stormtrooper 2LT, 501st MSG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam. Posted November 1, 2021 Share Posted November 1, 2021 +Support I'm the staff member that warned him, and I would like the warn to be removed. I apologise for any inconvenience caused. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
recon Posted November 1, 2021 Share Posted November 1, 2021 5 minutes ago, Adam. said: +Support I'm the staff member that warned him, and I would like the warn to be removed. I apologise for any inconvenience caused. + Support The staff member that handled the sit in game believes the warn should be removed. Hi Adam! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phillers Posted November 1, 2021 Share Posted November 1, 2021 +Support. Let me be clear in stating that I think you are bulshitting and rules-lawyering here, but that you are doing so successfully. I propose this rule is simply changed to state "Observed" instead of specifying that it has to be F/CI forces. 1 "Without morals, are we truly any better than the things we've set ourselves to contain?" EX-Site Director | EX-Super Admin | EX-Event Team Lead | Otter Lover | Regardless of what SMT Says, not a furry. | R&D Senior Inspector Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CyClone Posted November 1, 2021 Share Posted November 1, 2021 1 hour ago, Phillers said: +Support. Let me be clear in stating that I think you are bulshitting and rules-lawyering here, but that you are doing so successfully. I propose this rule is simply changed to state "Observed" instead of specifying that it has to be F/CI forces. Retried: CI LTCMDR CI R&D AIN, E11 CPT, and Research Assistant Manager. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gyara Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 He didn't technically break any of the rules, there's no evidence except for the logs. If foundation personnel was actually watching him we would need evidence. So if there's no evidence except for the chat logs I would give this +support for his warn to get appealed Former Nu7 Command Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darby Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 10 hours ago, Phillers said: +Support. Let me be clear in stating that I think you are bulshitting and rules-lawyering here, but that you are doing so successfully. I propose this rule is simply changed to state "Observed" instead of specifying that it has to be F/CI forces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demon Dice Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 The staff member that gave the warn apologized and said it was a mistake, so this is already all but dealt with +support Demonically Inspired ..Nu7 CMDR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sixx Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 17 hours ago, Adam. said: +Support I'm the staff member that warned him, and I would like the warn to be removed. I apologise for any inconvenience caused. [ SCP RP ] Director of Research & Security || Armored Shield Award Winner || First Head Warden & HOPO || Security Artillery Unit || D-7025 || D-Class High Council || Former Head of Security || Former Admin || Former Event Team Member Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Average Pipebomb enjoyer Posted November 3, 2021 Author Share Posted November 3, 2021 Just to clarify i do not want any actions taken towards the staff member i just want the warn removed E11 2LT || Ex CI 2LT || Average Metal gear rising enjoyer || Ex Nu7 2LT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief_ Posted November 3, 2021 Share Posted November 3, 2021 Accepted After some review this warn appeal is being accepted. 912 is considered an SCP that just follows foundations orders. The staff member has informed me that he did not know of the second part of the rule so this warn will be appealed. To have your warn removed, go to the "Bans" Section at the top of the forums, navigate to your profile, find the warning for this appeal, and for the reason on the appeal, link this post. Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts