TheMasterMeteor Posted October 28, 2021 Share Posted October 28, 2021 General Suggestions Post name: “General Suggestion - NameOfWhatIsBeingSuggested” What are you suggesting? - SCP Self Breach: I have a problem with the number of people needing to be on to self breach. I am from Australia and can only get on when there are 30 to 45 people on. Now my issue is that to self breach, no matter the time, has to be 70, i wanna suggest making it where at a certain time, allow self breaching to be done at 35 to 40+ people and when its peak time, keep the 70+ rule. How would this change better the server? - I think it allow people who love to be SCP like myself to enjoy the server more when its not as active, when ive been on, there have been MTF and Gensec on to capture and recontain me so that is not an issue. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - In my eyes, no, i see it as fair, because there are alot of SCP who just sit in their cells, unable to move or do anything, especially those in HCZ where they are faced with 1: their cells, then 2: The checkpoint. It is hard for D class to come down to breach us. Who would this change mostly benefit? - The SCP Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nydekore Posted October 28, 2021 Share Posted October 28, 2021 -Support Your case is unfortunate but that’s exactly why the rule is in place. It’d be unhealthy to be having SCPs breaching constantly when there’s no/limited foundation combatants on to stop them or re-contain them Former: Deputy Head of Research | MTF Nu-7 Captain x2 | SCPRP Super Admin | MTF O-1 Major Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piller Posted October 28, 2021 Share Posted October 28, 2021 40 minutes ago, Nydekore said: -Support Your case is unfortunate but that’s exactly why the rule is in place. It’d be unhealthy to be having SCPs breaching constantly when there’s no/limited foundation combatants on to stop them or re-contain them SCP-RP Head of Staff | Ethics Committee Chairman Former Nu-7 VCMDR l Former GenSec CPT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief_ Posted October 28, 2021 Share Posted October 28, 2021 2 hours ago, Nydekore said: -Support Your case is unfortunate but that’s exactly why the rule is in place. It’d be unhealthy to be having SCPs breaching constantly when there’s no/limited foundation combatants on to stop them or re-contain them Its unfortunate that this happens but we are a American based server. Est. Head Admin SCP-RP || Event Team Overseer || Ethics Committee || Ex Security FTO 1LT || Ex Security Warden || Ex CI R&D Senior Agent || UMC Guest [LVL 0] || Former Research Researcher || Former DORSU || Former DOC || Former LCZ Manager || I aM sPeCiAl || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Demon Dice Posted October 28, 2021 Share Posted October 28, 2021 7 hours ago, Nydekore said: -Support Your case is unfortunate but that’s exactly why the rule is in place. It’d be unhealthy to be having SCPs breaching constantly when there’s no/limited foundation combatants on to stop them or re-contain them 4 hours ago, Chief_ said: Its unfortunate that this happens but we are a American based server. Est. What they said Demonically Inspired ..Nu7 CMDR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOx Posted October 29, 2021 Share Posted October 29, 2021 11 hours ago, Nydekore said: -Support Your case is unfortunate but that’s exactly why the rule is in place. It’d be unhealthy to be having SCPs breaching constantly when there’s no/limited foundation combatants on to stop them or re-contain them Going to have to Agree, -Support Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DumpTruck Posted October 29, 2021 Share Posted October 29, 2021 23 hours ago, Nydekore said: -Support Your case is unfortunate but that’s exactly why the rule is in place. It’d be unhealthy to be having SCPs breaching constantly when there’s no/limited foundation combatants on to stop them or re-contain them Former RRH Analyst X-ray 39 Former D1 Deimos I Former DDOP of RnD [CC's] Deadshot-Engineer-Snoop Dog-MTF-Alpha-9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eem Posted October 30, 2021 Share Posted October 30, 2021 (edited) This would be unbalanced as those 40 people online are mostly AFK players and SCPs could just run freely with barely any foundation staff on. -support, I'm sorry that your situation is as it is, but we can't allow SCPs to run freely, causing havoc Edited October 30, 2021 by Eem 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Salvador Posted October 31, 2021 Share Posted October 31, 2021 Sorry man. It's an American server, most people are AFK at that time anyway. You'd really have nothing to do that wouldn't involve some type of rule being broken, outside of the breaching one in this case, as most people would be AFK. The odd combatant or two may come out to try and stop you but odds are you'd just smash through them and they'd just go AFK since it's already pretty hard to recontain quite a few of the SCPs at peak times. Imagine if there were only 2 combatants on and 682 was self-breaching at 5 in the morning with 45 people on. The best you can really do is try to hop on during the weekends because peak hours extend during those days. -Support It sucks too because, as far as I know, there's no AU SCPRP servers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coltable Posted November 2, 2021 Share Posted November 2, 2021 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts