Jump to content

General suggestion: Update 939 section of MOTD


Its Buck

Recommended Posts

What are you suggesting? -  Change/clarification of 939 rules in the MOTD

Current MOTD ruling; 

SCP-939: A keter class SCP. SCP-939 is extremely dangerous and should be contained at all times unless being tested on. It is the perfect killer as it is over 12 feet in length and has large extremities, but it has no sense of sight. It relies singularly on sound to identify its prey.

To be recontained, SCP-939 must be shot with a tranquilizer round after being lowered to 1500 health. Once struck and unconscious, 939 must remain in the place it falls asleep for 15 seconds upon regaining control of their character. During this time personnel may approach and handcuff 939. 939 can then be returned to its containment cell.

SCP-939 may attack anyone who is running, speaking, opening a door, or otherwise making noise.

An individual who is crouching while walking is not making noise, however, if they speak or fire a weapon they become an eligible target.

CHANGES TO THE MOTD: 

SCP-939: A keter class SCP. SCP-939 is extremely dangerous and should be contained at all times unless being tested on. It is the perfect killer as it is over 12 feet in length and has large extremities, but it has no sense of sight. It relies singularly on sound to identify its prey.

To be recontained, SCP-939 must be shot with a tranquilizer round after being lowered to 1500 health. Once struck and unconscious, 939 must remain in the place it falls asleep for 15 seconds upon regaining control of their character. During this time personnel may approach and handcuff 939. 939 can then be returned to its containment cell.

If a noise is made (walking, shooting, talking in VC etc) SCP 939 can attack the player until The player is no longer inside of SCP 939 FOV. (Turning a corner, closing a door or using a smoke/flash grenade) Once out of sight the target is no longer eligible to be killed and considered lost. 
 

SCP-939 Must have a visual of said person making a noise before being allowed to engage.

(Or something like that, I’m not very good with grammar)

How would this change better the server? - It would reduce the amount of RDM sits on 939 and clarify some of the rules on his class

Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. -  None that I can think 

Who would this change mostly benefit? - Whole server and staff  

Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A

RETIRED

SCP-RP:Delta-5 CPT | Deputy Head G9| Medical DHFW Doctor. | E11 1LT | Head Ranger | D4 Vanguard FF5 | RnD EOI V3 Canibal

ImperialRP: MC 1LT Bacon 3817 |  DT SGT FF5

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly +Support

I’ve taken 4 sits in the past 3 days that involved SCP-939, 3 out of 4 of those sits, the involved person(s) were incredibly argumentative with my punishment/decision for the sit. Problem is, with 939, it always comes down to Staff Discretion, considering the rules aren’t exactly clear on what IS considered a sound, and when the effect of that sound is “no longer in effect”

 

With Best Regards,
CI R&D Deputy Director Of Operations


|| - Retired SCP-RP Event Team Leader || Retired SCP-RP Admin || -Retired CI R&D Head of Research||

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+Support

When I was staffing, 939 sits were one of the more common ones I had to take. As Neo said, it all comes down to the staff member and can be really difficult to decide.

SCP-RP: G.O.C MAJ | Alpha-1 SGT 'Rose' | Strike Team Hammer 'Goose'Event Team Member     

Retired: E11 LTCOL Omi9 MAJ Nu7 LTCOL OH3 | Senior Mod | Event Team Member

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Southpaw said:

+Support

When I was staffing, 939 sits were one of the more common ones I had to take. As Neo said, it all comes down to the staff member and can be really difficult to decide.

 

~Your Local SCP Lead AdminAka: Rekti-High
The REAL Don Godfather 527 | CEO of the Minge Team | The Baby Joe | Leader of the Fish Mafia

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Southpaw said:

+Support

When I was staffing, 939 sits were one of the more common ones I had to take. As Neo said, it all comes down to the staff member and can be really difficult to decide.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/12/2021 at 7:15 PM, Southpaw said:

+Support

When I was staffing, 939 sits were one of the more common ones I had to take. As Neo said, it all comes down to the staff member and can be really difficult to decide.

 

MTF Epsilon-11 Commander | Event Team 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

+support 
This just makes sense, and seems like a completely valid rule update. Lore wise and gameplay wise? Perfect. 

Daddy D Boi |Previously CI SGM XB1 and RAM|Formerly Agent Starboi| CCs: Frank West | Doctor Samuel Hayden | Solid Snake | CI Recon Force | Drip Hank Hill | The O7 Bois (Owner of Sunsetters)
The Femboi With The Fubar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/12/2021 at 12:15 PM, Southpaw said:

+Support

When I was staffing, 939 sits were one of the more common ones I had to take. As Neo said, it all comes down to the staff member and can be really difficult todecide.

+Support

 CI Military Sergeant Major CI R&D Assistant Archivist and Lead of Sleuths

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 5/12/2021 at 8:53 AM, NeoID said:

Honestly +Support

I’ve taken 4 sits in the past 3 days that involved SCP-939, 3 out of 4 of those sits, the involved person(s) were incredibly argumentative with my punishment/decision for the sit. Problem is, with 939, it always comes down to Staff Discretion, considering the rules aren’t exactly clear on what IS considered a sound, and when the effect of that sound is “no longer in effect”

 

 

"𝘕𝘰 𝘐 𝘢𝘪𝘯'𝘵 𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘳𝘦𝘥 𝘰𝘧 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯'
'𝘊𝘢𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘪𝘵'𝘴 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘸𝘦'𝘷𝘦 𝘨𝘰𝘵
𝘞𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘦 𝘣𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯' 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘧 𝘸𝘦 𝘢𝘪𝘯'𝘵 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯'?"

-Retired CI MAJ Zero

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+support

anything that can make the lives of everyone on the server, especially staffs, easier im down for

Former E11 1LT/Head Ranger,  Former Event Team/Staff Member| GENSEC SGT Foundation Chef

ezgif.com-gif-maker.gif.133a59eca14307e607c6ed8c10b1d560.gif<- me when the quiet guy in D-block begins to reach into his pocket

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/12/2021 at 10:53 AM, NeoID said:

Honestly +Support

I’ve taken 4 sits in the past 3 days that involved SCP-939, 3 out of 4 of those sits, the involved person(s) were incredibly argumentative with my punishment/decision for the sit. Problem is, with 939, it always comes down to Staff Discretion, considering the rules aren’t exactly clear on what IS considered a sound, and when the effect of that sound is “no longer in effect”

 

 

EX MAJ In MIL 
EX A2 In E4
Current VCMDR Of Sarkic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/12/2021 at 11:53 AM, NeoID said:

Honestly +Support

I’ve taken 4 sits in the past 3 days that involved SCP-939, 3 out of 4 of those sits, the involved person(s) were incredibly argumentative with my punishment/decision for the sit. Problem is, with 939, it always comes down to Staff Discretion, considering the rules aren’t exactly clear on what IS considered a sound, and when the effect of that sound is “no longer in effect”

 

 

[ SCP RP ] Director of Research & Security || Armored Shield Award Winner || First Head Warden & HOPO || Security Artillery Unit || D-7025 || D-Class High Council || Former Head of Security || Former Admin || Former Event Team Member

 

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...