Ghosted Posted March 26, 2020 Share Posted March 26, 2020 What you want to see? - Staff not allowed to -support/+support on their own Warn Appeals Why should we add it? - Because it maybe biased as the staff member will probably think its not false What are the advantages of having this? - There isn't an unbiased opinion Who is it mainly for? - People who post False warn appeals Links to any content - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ender Posted March 26, 2020 Share Posted March 26, 2020 +/- Support All you are really doing is denying one person to voice their opinion on the matter. It is like saying, don't let someone comment on their own warn appeal,etc. I can see that this might be useful but seems too restricted. Ender | Former SWAT Lieutenant | Senior Low Command | SWAT FTO | Previous PoliceRP Administrator COL Will 1L52 to admins: Max, you ain't going to scare them, you are on a female model and stuttering... "So what're you doing?" - @SWAT LT Ender 22-D "Putting my clothes back on". - @SWAT SFC Nao 27-D "There's a fine line between right and wrong. And somewhere, in the shadows, they've sent us to find it." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocco_Rex Posted March 26, 2020 Share Posted March 26, 2020 -support Staff member should be allowed to explain why they did what they did. And they absolutely should be allowed to +support Retired as IRP assistant head game master, IRP SNR admin, PRP admin, IC Commander, SRT 2LT, EMS Head Deputy, FR DEFR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Sanchez Posted March 27, 2020 Share Posted March 27, 2020 - Support Wouldn't really make sense to restrict this because what if they agree it was false? Everyone should be able to voice their opinion. even if it is biased, one -support won't matter if everyone else +Supports Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
utetwo Posted March 27, 2020 Share Posted March 27, 2020 Just now, Rick Sanchez said: - Support Wouldn't really make sense to restrict this because what if they agree it was false? Everyone should be able to voice their opinion. even if it is biased, one -support won't matter if everyone else +Supports Currently a member of the Support Team, SRT, Dispatcher, EMS, and PD SM. Former Senior moderator, SWAT, Event Team, Secret Service, DD, and State Police. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayden Posted March 27, 2020 Share Posted March 27, 2020 4 minutes ago, Rocco_Rex said: -support Staff member should be allowed to explain why they did what they did. And they absolutely should be allowed to +support 2 minutes ago, Rick Sanchez said: - Support Wouldn't really make sense to restrict this because what if they agree it was false? Everyone should be able to voice their opinion. even if it is biased, one -support won't matter if everyone else +Supports - Support for these reasons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Posted March 27, 2020 Share Posted March 27, 2020 Kinda-Accepted! Please allow up to a week for any suggestions you have requested to be added in game or on the forums. How I do it is simple. I look at their own response towards the false warn but I don't take their +/- support b/c it could be one sided. PoliceRP Manager Retired SRT Commander | Police Commissioner | Department Supervisor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts