Harr y

Battalion Name: Tank Trooper Job/Class Name: Shore Trooper Current HP: 300 New HP: 500 Current armor: 100 New armor: N/A Weapon Kit: - Current loadout: rw_sw_e22 | rw_sw_dlt19 | rw_sw_k16 | deployable_shield |rw_sw_scattershotgun - Add: rw_sw_huntershotgun | alydus_fusioncutter | rw_sw_tl50 - Remove: rw_sw_scattershotgun | rw_sw_dlt19 Reason for change (do you think that said weapons is suitable for the job and is fair considering current loadouts of other battalions?): Shore's transition to an IPO requires these changes to ensure fairness, while still keeping the IPO edge. Do you believe these changes are fair to the battalion/job role it is responsible for and will benefit the server, if so, why?: Implementing these changes for the Shore is Beneficial. It brings back the excitement and engagement that the Army hasn't seen since its last IPO almost a year ago. This move revitalizes the server, benefiting everyone involved. Job/Class Name: Shore Trooper NCO Current HP: 400 New HP: 600 Current armor: 100 New armor: 150 Weapon Kit: - Current loadout:rw_sw_dlt19 | rw_sw_e22 | rw_sw_dp23 | rw_sw_k16 | deployable_shield| rw_sw_pinglauncher | lfs_antiairturret - Add:rw_sw_huntershotgun | alydus_fusioncutter | rw_sw_tl50 - Remove: rw_sw_dp23 | rw_sw_dlt19 | lfs_antiairturret | rw_sw_pinglauncher Reason for change (do you think that said weapons is suitable for the job and is fair considering current loadouts of other battalions?): Shore's transition to an IPO requires these changes to ensure fairness, while still keeping the IPO edge. Do you believe these changes are fair to the battalion/job role it is responsible for and will benefit the server, if so, why?: Implementing these changes for the Shore is Beneficial. It brings back the excitement and engagement that the Army hasn't seen since its last IPO almost a year ago. This move revitalizes the server, benefiting everyone involved. . Job/Class Name: Shore Trooper Officer Current HP: 450 New HP: 650 Current armor: 150 New armor: 200 Weapon Kit: - Current loadout:rw_sw_dlt19 | rw_sw_e22 |rw_sw_huntershotgun | rw_sw_k16 | rw_sw_pinglauncher | lfs_antiairturret - Add: alydus_fusioncutter | rw_sw_tl50 | rw_sw_dp23 - Remove: lfs_antiairturret | rw_sw_dlt19 | rw_sw_huntershotgun | rw_sw_pinglauncher Reason for change (do you think that said weapons is suitable for the job and is fair considering current loadouts of other battalions?): Shore's transition to an IPO requires these changes to ensure fairness, while still keeping the IPO edge. Do you believe these changes are fair to the battalion/job role it is responsible for and will benefit the server, if so, why?: Implementing these changes for the Shore is Beneficial. It brings back the excitement and engagement that the Army hasn't seen since its last IPO almost a year ago. This move revitalizes the server, benefiting everyone involved. Job/Class Name: Shore Trooper Heavy Current HP: 350 New HP: 500 Current armor: 100 New armor: 200 Model Path: - Current model: models/player/bunny/coastal_defence_garrison/shoretrooper_sergeant.mdl -new model: models/player/bunny/coastal_defence_garrison/shoretrooper_officer.mdl Weapon Kit: - Current loadout:rw_sw_e22 | rw_sw_z6i | rw_sw_k16 | deployable_shield - Add: N/A - Remove: N/A Reason for change (do you think that said weapons is suitable for the job and is fair considering current loadouts of other battalions?): Shore's transition to an IPO requires these changes to ensure fairness, while still keeping the IPO edge. Do you believe these changes are fair to the battalion/job role it is responsible for and will benefit the server, if so, why?: Implementing these changes for the Shore is Beneficial. It brings back the excitement and engagement that the Army hasn't seen since its last IPO almost a year ago. This move revitalizes the server, benefiting everyone involved. Job/Class Name: Tank Trooper Commander Weapon Kit: - Current loadout: rw_sw_e11t, rw_sw_huntershotgun,rw_sw_t21, rw_sw_se14r, rw_sw_smartlauncher,deployable_shield, alydus_fusioncutter, alydus_fortificationbuildertablet - Add: lfs_antiairturret, rw_sw_pinglauncher, rw_sw_dlt19 - Remove: rw_sw_t21, Reason for change (do you think that said weapons is suitable for the job and is fair considering current loadouts of other battalions?):The reason for these changes is the DLT-19 will give the job more of a fresh kit as the kit has never been changed since it came out and with the anti air turret and ping launcher since we are changing shore we didn’t want tank to lose out on these two items because of that. Job/Class Name: Tank Trooper VCMDR Weapon Kit: - Current loadout: rw_sw_e11t, rw_sw_huntershotgun,rw_sw_t21, rw_sw_se14r, rw_sw_smartlauncher,deployable_shield, alydus_fusioncutter, alydus_fortificationbuildertablet - Add: lfs_antiairturret, rw_sw_pinglauncher, rw_sw_dlt19 - Remove: rw_sw_t21 Reason for change (do you think that said weapons is suitable for the job and is fair considering current loadouts of other battalions?): The reason for these changes is the DLT-19 will give the job more of a fresh kit as the kit has never been changed since it came out and with the anti air turret and ping launcher since we are changing shore we didn’t want tank to lose out on these two items because of that. Job/Class Name: Tank Trooper Officer Weapon Kit: - Current loadout: rw_sw_e11t, rw_sw_huntershotgun,rw_sw_t21, rw_sw_se14r, rw_sw_smartlauncher,deployable_shield, alydus_fusioncutter, alydus_fortificationbuildertablet - Add: lfs_antiairturret, rw_sw_pinglauncher, rw_sw_dlt19 - Remove: rw_sw_t21 Reason for change (do you think that said weapons is suitable for the job and is fair considering current loadouts of other battalions?): The reason for these changes is the DLT-19 will give the job more of a fresh kit as the kit has never been changed since it came out and with the anti air turret and ping launcher since we are changing shore we didn’t want tank to lose out on these two items because of that. Job/Class Name: Tank Trooper NCO Weapon Kit: - Current loadout: rw_sw_e11t, rw_sw_huntershotgun,rw_sw_t21, rw_sw_se14r, deployable_shield, alydus_fusioncutter, alydus_fortificationbuildertablet - Add:lfs_antiairturret, rw_sw_pinglauncher, rw_sw_dlt19 - Remove: rw_sw_t21 Reason for change (do you think that said weapons is suitable for the job and is fair considering current loadouts of other battalions?): The reason for these changes is the DLT-19 will give the job more of a fresh kit as the kit has never been changed since it came out and with the anti air turret and ping launcher since we are changing shore we didn’t want tank to lose out on these two items because of that.

+Support -- Gives those with fusion cutters more usage with the item -- Increases RP within those battalions -- Could possibly make it so if a certain section of the ship which needs to be repaired isn't repaired, fuel leaks and the fuel on the supply system goes down.

What do you want to see?: I would like to see an possible system for janitors and chefs, like chefs could cook food using rations and depending on how long it took to make it or how much rations it uses, it could have a varying effect, like a speed boost for 5 minutes. And for Janitors they could do something similar to what SCP did where there was trash/rubbish in areas that could be cleaned up for GC. Why should we add it?: It would add more uses towards the level jobs and could increase RP with the cantina and general unused areas around the ship What are the advantages of having this?: It gives GC for those who just want to do passive RP, gives much more uses towards the supply system, and could increase RP and use of those level jobs which are now barely touched. Who is it mainly for?: Everyone Links to any content: N/A

Moved to the Right Section

Battalion Name: Hcom Job/Class Name: Brigadier General Weapon Kit: - Current loadout: dradio, rw_sw_bino_white, arrest_stick, unarrest_stick, rw_sw_dp23, rw_sw_e11d, voice_amplifier, cross_arms_swep, cross_arms_infront_swep, rw_sw_dlt19, weapon_cuff_elastic, rw_sw_dual_ib94, rw_sw_dlt19x, rw_sw_e11t, event_objective_swep - Add: rw_sw_dlt20a, weapon_officerboost_normal, rw_sw_westar35, rw_sw_tl50 - Remove: dual IB94, dlt 19x, rw_sw_e11t Reason for change (do you think that said weapons is suitable for the job and is fair considering current loadouts of other battalions?): The reason for this change is because Army Hcom feels that our loadouts are outdated and need to be changed to reflect current times and additions. We also believe that the things we are removing and the things we are adding doesn’t add any unfairness towards the other jobs and still keeps our kits balanced. Job/Class Name: General Weapon Kit: - Current loadout: dradio, rw_sw_bino_white, arrest_stick, unarrest_stick, rw_sw_dp23, rw_sw_e11d, voice_amplifier, cross_arms_swep, cross_arms_infront_swep, rw_sw_dlt19, weapon_cuff_elastic, rw_sw_dual_ib94, rw_sw_dlt19x, rw_sw_e11t, event_objective_swep - Add: rw_sw_dlt20a, weapon_officerboost_normal, rw_sw_westar35, rw_sw_tl50 - Remove: dual IB94, dlt 19x, rw_sw_e11t Reason for change (do you think that said weapons is suitable for the job and is fair considering current loadouts of other battalions?): The reason for this change is because Army Hcom feels that our loadouts are outdated and need to be changed to reflect current times and additions. We also believe that the things we are removing and the things we are adding doesn’t add any unfairness towards the other jobs and still keeps our kits balanced. Job/Class Name: High General Weapon Kit: - Current loadout: dradio, rw_sw_bino_white, arrest_stick, unarrest_stick, rw_sw_dp23, rw_sw_e11d, voice_amplifier, cross_arms_swep, cross_arms_infront_swep, weapon_cuff_elastic, rw_sw_dual_ib94, rw_sw_dlt19x, rw_sw_e11t, event_objective_swep, rw_sw_t21 - Add: rw_sw_dlt20a, weapon_officerboost_normal, rw_sw_dlt19, rw_sw_westar35, rw_sw_tl50 - Remove: dual IB94, dlt 19x, rw_sw_t21, rw_sw_e11t Reason for change (do you think that said weapons is suitable for the job and is fair considering current loadouts of other battalions?): The reason for this change is because Army Hcom feels that our loadouts are outdated and need to be changed to reflect current times and additions. We also believe that the things we are removing and the things we are adding doesn’t add any unfairness towards the other jobs and still keeps our kits balanced. Job/Class Name: Grand General Weapon Kit: - Current loadout: dradio, rw_sw_bino_white, arrest_stick, unarrest_stick, rw_sw_dp23, rw_sw_e11d, voice_amplifier, cross_arms_swep, cross_arms_infront_swep, weapon_cuff_elastic, rw_sw_dual_ib94, rw_sw_dlt19x, rw_sw_e11t, event_objective_swep, rw_sw_t21 - Add: rw_sw_dlt20a, weapon_officerboost_normal, rw_sw_dlt19, rw_sw_westar35, rw_sw_tl50 - Remove: dual IB94, dlt 19x, rw_sw_t21, rw_sw_e11t Reason for change (do you think that said weapons is suitable for the job and is fair considering current loadouts of other battalions?): The reason for this change is because Army Hcom feels that our loadouts are outdated and need to be changed to reflect current times and additions. We also believe that the things we are removing and the things we are adding doesn’t add any unfairness towards the other jobs and still keeps our kits balanced.

Accepted Please speak to high command for your rank!

Accepted Please speak to high command for your rank!

Accepted Please speak to high command for your rank!

Accepted Please speak to high command for your rank!

Denied Thank you for your interest in joining the Army Command Team. You may reapply in 2 weeks.

Denied Thank you for your interest in joining the Army Command Team. You may reapply in 2 weeks.

Denied Thank you for your interest in joining the Army Command Team. You may reapply in 2 weeks.

OMG FIRST FORUMS RESEARCH POST IN FOREVER, So proud rn

Pink, I cannot believe that you would do something so heinous, so evil and so sadistic as something like this, my crimes don't even compare to this.

Bro Truly cooked and smoked it

+support Good staff member Friendly active trustworthy

This has been moved to the correct section

+support Didn't even realise this feature is gone but it is a good idea to have a targeting system as many times while fighting with IQ, there is accidental force usage upon those who aren't the target.

In-Game Name: Harry Steam Name: [GL]Terminator2121 SteamID: STEAM_0:0:639276651 What is your staff rank and the server you work in? Admin, Imperial RP How long have you been apart of the Gaminglight community? Since November 2021 How long have you been a staff member on Gaminglight? I have been staff for 7 months now(223 days to be exact) How often are you online on the forums? I am online pretty much everyday, though I might not reply to something or post something everyday, I still look over and browse the forums everyday Why do you believe you're qualified to serve as a Forum Diplomat? There are a few reasons as of why I believe I am qualified to serve as a forums diplomat, the main reasons are that I have a good understanding of how the forums operate and the rules with it due to me being apart of the GL forums community for awhile, I would also like to broaden my responsibilities as a staff member as I feel like I could be doing so much more and assist with the forums, especially since currently imperial doesn't have many forums diplomats to assist with its side of the forums page. Would you consider yourself to have good judgement? If so, please describe a situation that required you to make a difficult decision? As of right now I can't think of an instance,as there has been many situations during my time on the server where a difficult decision based on good judgement mainly due to me being a command member and high ranking officer in many battalions, though when I have had to make difficult decisions even though it was difficult, I haven’t regretted my decisions as in the end they were for the betterment of my battalion and sometimes(though rarely) the server How would you deal with a situation where a user is spamming in various topics due to getting banned from one of our servers? I would send them a forum DM stating to please stop spamming on the forums page or harsher punishment may be handed out, if they hadn’t already typed on their respective servers ban appeal page I would send them a link to their respective ban appeal part of the forums and hide their spams across the forums, if this continues after warning them verbally about this issue, i would proceed to inform a Senior forums diplomat about this issue and request to have the user be warned, I would also hide the rest of their forums post that has been spammed unnecessarily across the forums How would you deal with a situation where two users are aggressively arguing with each other in a warning appeal? I would post a warning in the respective warning appeal thread saying “Please keep this thread to a +support/-support basis ONLY. Arguing between each other is prohibited. Failure to do so and continued arguing will result in forums warnings/restrictions being handed out as well as this topic being locked until SMT reviews it”

ACCEPTED, please speak to a Maj+ for your training

+ Support, I would love to see this happen on the pandora as it would increase the reasons why Pyke would go to the pandora and SF would be needed to transport troops to the pandora, which could give reason for people to join both SF and pyke even more

+Support I have seen Turqous grow from a scoundrel all the way to a sentinel, he has shown excellence in the pykes specialties, activity and dedication, and overall conduct of work. Turqous is the best choice for Pyke not because he is the only other person who could apply, but because he has shown all the traits I've said above which is currently what Pyke needs

Will miss you man, and all the times you hunted me down, in all seriousness though, I hope to see you around in the future and that you enjoy your retirement from the server, o7