Jump to content

General suggestion for LCZ Intersection - Denied


ZJ

Recommended Posts

What are you suggesting? -  That during a partial lockdown of d-block passive "safe" SCP's not be allowed to clog up the intersection.

How would this change better the server? -  It would allow more movement and ability for security to group up outside d-block without having SCP's in their way while they try and retake it.

Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. -  SCP's might have to walk around during a partial through medbay.

Who would this change mostly benefit? - Security and the foundation in general.

Foundation are already not allowed in d-block during a partial, especially researchers know not to even try and come to d-block during a partial. It is dangerous for them to be in the area to begin with. I don't mind the ones already allowed in d-block being in there during a partial, just not in the intersection since it is a small area and the stand off point for security once we have lost it.

Edited by ZJ

| SEC Armored Shield 1LT Wardens WC DHFTO | SVFTO Elite Medic |  SVFTO Maintenance Expert | Xray 42 | E11 CPL | Nu7 CPL | D5 PVT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chem said:

 -Support Safe Class SCPs must follow commands issued by foundation with the exception of 66 who must be forced , just tell them to get out 

except they don't, leading to constant staff sits. Also this is about the intersection not d-block itself.

Edited by ZJ

| SEC Armored Shield 1LT Wardens WC DHFTO | SVFTO Elite Medic |  SVFTO Maintenance Expert | Xray 42 | E11 CPL | Nu7 CPL | D5 PVT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Chem said:

 -Support Safe Class SCPs must follow commands issued by foundation with the exception of 66 who must be forced , just tell them to get out 

 

                                                      192412312_screenshot_2020-02-26_at_9-24-(1).png.43e614bc17bbf87004d3acba288c52df.png
                                                                             Chad of many names       Professional Shit talker

                                                                                       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Head of Staff
30 minutes ago, Chem said:

 -Support Safe Class SCPs must follow commands issued by foundation with the exception of 66 who must be forced , just tell them to get out 

 

ImperialRP SMT | Head of Staff       

Head Forums Diplomat

Former High Admiral | Former DT Commander | Former State LTCOL | Former SPRT Commander

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chem said:

 -Support Safe Class SCPs must follow commands issued by foundation with the exception of 66 who must be forced , just tell them to get out 

 

Current: Nu-7 VCMDR

 Former: E-11 VCMDR/LT-COL totally didn't get demoted || Event Team Member || CI SFTO 2LT

CCs: Snoop Dog Owner || Previous Rho-36 Occult Operative || Used to be Reznov || CI TF2 Heavy || MTF Zeta-0 'Caste Gates' || Tango-12 'Forgiving Hand'

 French Canadian man || Mbappé fan in the making

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chem said:

 -Support Safe Class SCPs must follow commands issued by foundation with the exception of 66 who must be forced , just tell them to get out 

 

Nu7 CPT Nu7 DHFTO Head of Degeneracy | Former OH7 
HSU #1 
Ex Nu7 MAJ | Ex DHFTO | Ex HSU Commissar |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2020 at 1:03 AM, pixalgamer99 said:

-support for the intersection but I would +support not letting them in D block during a partial

 

[ SCP RP ] Director of Research & Security || Armored Shield Award Winner || First Head Warden & HOPO || Security Artillery Unit || D-7025 || D-Class High Council || Former Head of Security || Former Admin || Former Event Team Member

 

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2020 at 1:03 AM, pixalgamer99 said:

-support for the intersection but I would +support not letting them in D block during a partial

 

Retired DHOS || Former Wardens Comissioner Caligula || Former SRIC in R&D || Former OH8 Funni [Redacted] Man | | Retired OPSV in Maintenance || Former MMF Duck || Former HLPR Bot AC3 || Retired 2LT in E-11 || Former Head Field Scout || Former Ranger Pax || former ET || Former Omicron-9 CPT  || Former OM9 EXP Delta PoliceRP: PD LCPL | SCU LT

"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard. " -John F Kennedy, Rice University, Sept. 12, 1962

921397099_FloppaGif.gif.0ca3f427de08905a1e4630bb46685aef.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

-Support

Too cumbersome to enforce as a regular rule over the rule of just telling them to leave the area.

Safe class SCPs unfortunately have a habit of getting underfoot no matter where they are, and we can't keep banning access to specific hallways at specific times/conditions or else the rules will get very hard to follow correctly.

O5-9: "Misfortune"  A.K.A.  "Mr. Unlucky"

"Accidents Happen-- Mostly to me!"

spacer.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...