ShdSteel Posted September 22, 2020 Share Posted September 22, 2020 I believe the primary attack from SCP 966 should be changed either by increasing the damage or the swing speed. After playing with 3-4 other people last night on 5208, 098, and 966, it appears that 966's attack damage isnt sufficient. Even with 5 of us playing 966, we werent able to fight only 2 MTF. Each hit appeared to do only 20-25 damage and the swing speed was way too low (each hit taking over 1 second to reswing). Our HP was also 500 and no armor. Compare this to 098 with 600HP and 200 armor, its hits were substantially more damaging while also having the charge hit ability, we were able to rival 5-6 MTF, inevitably being defeated but still led to a fun and fair fight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunther Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 -Support Two things: 1) No format. 2) Crank made a suggestion not too long ago and it was denied. 966 are weak due to their incredibly fast self breach times and due to how strong they can be when not fighting MTF, or those without Thermals. Former Security Captain | Former RCF Commander | Former Admin of SCP:RP | King Penguin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surge Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 -Support 966 is already a pain to death with because they never uncloak so you can kill them easier when thermals are active, 2 966 Is ment to be fighting in a pack not single's you are extremly dangerous while attacking in pairs of 2-3 , they are extremly fast aswell Ret MTF Nu7 1LT SFTO Surge| Ret OH2 RRH , Retired SM Gensec | No officer that 24Pounds of plutonium isn't mine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pixalgamer99 Posted September 23, 2020 Share Posted September 23, 2020 -support while 966 is weak he is only weak alone they are supposed too hunt in groups like the soldiers or the raptors they are weak alone but in groups terrifying if you want too live. 966 can also go invisible witch if their CC gets broken at least on the old map no one really check 966s CC and a good group of 966s don’t need cloak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[GL] Zeus Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 -Support The range on 966 is pretty good and it can shred through anything in groups. It’s damage Is perfect as it is in my opinion Former || SCP-RP: Commander of Epsilon-11 || Chaos Insurgency Captain || Senior Admin || Forums Diplomat || Rho-36 Arcane Autonomous Scout || Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
verycrankyredhead Posted September 25, 2020 Share Posted September 25, 2020 why did you link me big sad also -support Retired Research Low Command Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Altair Posted September 25, 2020 Share Posted September 25, 2020 They have the same run as a normal human not fast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stage Posted September 25, 2020 Share Posted September 25, 2020 -support 966 is weak alone, but with the other 966s they can easily take on anyone in short range, long range 966 is kinda screwed so you gotta be able to pick your battles, 966 is great at that Current | Vice Sovereign Kir Kanos | Former | Shadow Guard VII Stage (2020) || Shadow Guard Lead Ren Blackstar (2023-2024)| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dect Posted September 25, 2020 Share Posted September 25, 2020 1 hour ago, Stage said: -support 966 is weak alone, but with the other 966s they can easily take on anyone in short range, long range 966 is kinda screwed so you gotta be able to pick your battles, 966 is great at that On 9/22/2020 at 9:52 PM, Surge said: -Support 966 is already a pain to death with because they never uncloak so you can kill them easier when thermals are active, 2 966 Is ment to be fighting in a pack not single's you are extremly dangerous while attacking in pairs of 2-3 , they are extremly fast aswell Former Security 2LT | Former EWD| Former OM5|Former Medical SM|Former Reznov Klushkie| Former SCP-RP Senior Moderator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Igneous Posted October 3, 2020 Share Posted October 3, 2020 Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts