KLONDU

-SUPPORT *I'm not inclined to support this because, looking at your warn profile leading up to this ban, you were warned multiple times, for multiple egregious actions, especially multiple times for the same thing, and you are not the type of player that I feel warrants a second chance, because you've been given multiple already. At least not at this time.

+Support *Better than average application *Detailed *I believe most people deserve a chance A few notes though, *Keep in mind that a Trial Mod does not have access to the mute and gag commands, if you suspect a rule violation, speak to Mod+ and discuss why you want them restricted. *Only Admin+ has the ability to ban for any lengthy period of time, for an MRDM ban, you would need admin+ because the Ban exceeds 1 day, the max amount that an SMOD can do. *Be aware that being staff is a commitment, you may sometimes spend more time on the staff job than you do actually playing the game. Be prepared for that.

-support -Short ban -this should be a staff report -after viewing your Warning rap sheet you have a whopping total of 34 warns on ImperialRP alone. I do believe that people deserve second chances, but youve been given 34 over the past 8 months that you have played on the server, and you show no signs of stopping. a few more warns and you will be permanently banned. -Best of luck with your appeal.

-Support *I can see why this punishment was given. If you were posting this in OOC, this is no different than directly saying the word, because you are posting links that an unsuspecting member might open and be exposed to a word they don't want to hear. *Much less that you are posting to the ENTIRE current player count. This ban was fair. Let it stand for a long while. I have seen other people return from punishments like this but 3 months is way to short of a time. You have to learn that your actions have consequences. Regardless, best of luck with your appeal.

+support *Definitely needed. So many cadets struggle with this.

-support *Update this to follow the proper format. At present, it is rambling and hard to follow, which is what the format is designed to prevent. Edit it and I may reconsider. EDIT: -Support *After Reviewing the Edited version, and taking into consideration what others have said, I will be -supporting this. at present there is not a good enough reason to add this to the server.

-Support *As stated by multiple other members of this community, blacklists arent appealable. *I cannot tell if this appeal is for SCPRP, or IRP, but after I looked at my tools, I do not see any current bans or warns for you on IRP. If this is for an SCPRP ban/blacklist, it needs to be moved to the correct section. *I do believe that either you didnt know or are too proud to realize that we staff members do log these things, and we give reasons behind our actions. as such I was able to look you up and see exactly why you were banned multiple times, and finally blacklisted, from SCPRP. The screenshots of those logs will be included with this response. I will not endorse someone being unblacklisted after being given multiple chances and commiting multiple, very serious infractions over the span of less than 2 months' time. Your actions have consequences, and you should have to learn to deal with them. EDIT: *after discussing with an HA, getting blacklisted on one server does automatically get you blacklisted on all GL servers. It means that High staff has witnessed enough Misconduct to deem you unworthy of ever returning to Gaminglight. With all due respect, best of luck on your appeal.

1. Your In-game: Klondu | Gladius 2. Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:497585588 3. The player's name in-game: Researcher Settra | The Grand Receptionist 4. The player's steam name (If you know it): Thrakecius - STEAM_0:1:41623712 5. What did the player do: Force Abuse [FailRP?]x2 | RDM 6. Evidence (REQUIRED): https://imgur.com/a/DXJe8zN 7. What do you believe should happen to the player: This should be a formal warn. He also has over 11 warns on the server total, so there should be a ban involved here too, if he hasnt already served it. 8. Any extra information: When pulled into a sit over this issue, the individual pretended to be AFK, which is why I am making this report. Also, after speaking with IQ command about this, They told me to remove his IQ apprentice whitelist, so that was done as well.

I was there for this. it was an accident

1. Your In-game: Saber Guard Gladius | Royal guard SHG Klondu 2. Your SteamID: STEAM_0:1:497585588 3. The player's name in-game: Hunter Bounty 4. The player's steam name (If you know it): Greenguy8472 Steam ID---- STEAM_0:1:509111948 5. What did the player do: FailRPx2 | RDM Not only did he accept a hit on someone that was AFK, and clearly showed it, and completed that hit[FailRP | RDM], he proceeded to enter a restricted area to fulfill that bounty, twice. once to cross PCP, and twice to enter into a redacted bunk area.[FailRPx2] 6. Evidence (REQUIRED): https://imgur.com/a/p3CGLPV This contains both a screenshot of the log, and a screenshot of the rendered image resulting. 7. What do you believe should happen to the player: This should be a warn for FailRPx2 | RDM 8. Any extra information: Made a ticket in game about this, and the player was no longer in the game, and thus, I have to create a forums report.

-Support I am -supporting this not because I want to, I believe that everyone should get a chance to be staff if they feel they can handle it. However, There are few reasons I feel like I need to -Support this application. -This app shows a lot of evidence of being rushed. Your answers are short, and it seems as if you did not put a lot of thought into your answers. -Your Forums account was just created a few days ago. spend a few days, maybe a week learning how the forums work, and then put in another application. the reason for this is that staff is also required to be active on the forums +supporting and -Supporting applications like these, and providing feedback on them for SMT. -speak with some staff members, MOD+. Learn how they might handle their individual situations. you may learn some things about how staff handle themselves that you didnt know before, which in turn would help you in your next application. -My discord DM's are always open for staff questions. Messiah#7162 is my tag. I am also available in Teamspeak quite a bit, so feel free to PM me there, and I will respond to your inquiry as soon as I can -Good luck in all your endeavours, present and future.

+support

+Support. Great Idea

+Support -Amazing application -Well known and liked among those in the RG battalion -amazing RP ability, I love that you picked up on an aspect of the lore of Carnor Jax that most of the rest of us would have overlooked. -exceptional duelist

+Support, I will go ahead and support this, but here are a few comments: -The Application was kind of short. Give your applications more meat, so that we know you are 100% qualified for the position. -While you do need to show major leadership qualities to be a part of saber guard, as anomaly says it is largely different than being in a staffing position. -Otherwise, great application, and I wish you the best of luck!

+support, but with restrictions. -I feel like this should be locked behind a paywall, if added. We don't want everyone being able to spawn one in, since doing so might cause headache for staff if a rogue ST gets ahold of it. Maybe make the ability to spawn one in T1+?

There are currently no clarifications in the MOTD that state that criminals cannot attack other criminals. I did not need a reason to attack them. Logs show that I did indeed hit Thermite with my Detonator. At the time of the altercation, I did not believe I did. I came back and killed Thermite because NLR would not have applied to him if I had not hit him with the Detonator. Galaxy would be the only one NLR would apply to, because Galaxy was the one that killed me.

What do you want to see?: I would like to see a rule added regarding stun weapons. At present, anyone with a syun weapon can dominate the battlefield by stunning someone for 30 seconds, and utilizing that time to kill them while the trooper is helpless. I propose the rule be added: "stun weapons cannot be used in excess of 10 seconds." Why should we add it?: This is really unfair, as it gives someone more than ample time to lay into a person with the weapon of choosing, all while the victim is helpless. adding this rule would encourage teamwork and allow for the affected player to actually have a fighting chance. In addition, when you are stunned, it prevents you from respawning, so if someone stuns you for 30 seconds and kills you in 5, you have to wait a whole 25 seconds to actually respawn. What are the advantages of having this?: This encourages fair play and teamwork. it might promote those that have stun weapons to go out in pairs of 2, so that they might accomplish the same goal. Who is it mainly for?: everyone Links to any content: N/A

+Support -Have dealt with him multiple times. respectful, great player, friendly.

I do +support this. It makes sense that someone should get credit for an idea, so adding that question would be a good idea.

-Support -This has already been discussed among most of the officers within the battalion. If you had talked to anyone beyond CDT, you would know this. -The server used to have movie accurate models. They were changed because they were blocky and looked rigid 90% of the time. -We know they are not lore/movie accurate. Half the stuff that is currently enjoyed on the server is not lore accurate. -Follow the suggestion format -after reviewing your profile, you dont seem to even be in the battalion?

-Support -As much as this seems to be a good idea, I dont think it would be feasible to allow this. There are so many Maj+ on this server, that this could easily turn into a massive headache for high command. Instead of hearing between one and three voices, they would have to hear how many ever Maj+ are in each battalion. In other words, good in Theory, not so much in practice. -This is what officer meetings are for. Any commander that is actually fit for their station should be open to any and all Ideas from their officers, battalion suggestions and beyond. Battalions are supposed to be a coordinated effort, and if a battalion is still standing on the server, they are mostly Coordinated. -If you can't adequately get something through to your commander, and you have adequately followed the chain of command, it is more than feasible to go to the HC member that delegates to your commander. -I may be biased on this topic, since I do personally feel like I have a very supportive command team, so please, take my comments as you will.

+Support -Former staff -excellent application -have had numerous dealings with him, he is very respectful and mature. He would be a good fit for the staff team.