+/- Support
Situation 1
Video 1) Yes there is sufficent proof Ryan did spawn the prop BUT he deleted it straight away and did not cause any RP problems.
Video 2) Yes there is sufficent proof Ryan did spawn the prop BUT he deleted it straight away and did not cause any RP problems. Especially due to the fact a player was asking to be killed for a reset and therefore out of RP.
Situation 2
Screenshots) Ryan spoken to other staff members that he perfers using this dome prop to trap players that are breaking rules or trying to run away form a sit, hence what the pictures show. This is an administration perference as he doesn't want to bind the jail command. Although this may not be the most efficent way, it does not break the staff handbook.
Situation 3
Video and Screenshot) The video is very small time frame, only 6 seconds. It does not show what happened before or after, it can be taken out of context. Although Ryan shouldn't be in the vehicle, he may of had a valid reason to do so. Such as possibly getting the truck unstuck etc. I agree this could of been dealt with better, in my opinion it seems to be out of context and editited without getting the entire story.
Situation 4
Ryan at the time was being questioned whether "So you are 100% positive that you haven't been staff abusing in anyway, shape or form? Just clarification." He answered no because he might of thought everything that took place was not abuse. I personally do not see what he did as being ABUSIVE. Did he do things he shouldn't of done? Yes, that is why I am also + supporting this report. However, I feel that many people are overlooking all evidence against Ryan. He truly thought he did not break any rules. If you thought you didn't break a rule and you were sure that you were innocent, of course you would answer no. I find using this as a way to frame Ryan as a liar in bad taste.
Conclusion
Overall I would say that Ryan did not interrupt any RP except the video with the firetruck which had very little evidence or context of what was happening. I think Ryan did make mistakes and should of maybe dealt with the situations better. However, suggesting a REMOVAL of a staff member for set evidence provided is completely excessive. I would say the evidence shown warrants a punishment of a strike/talking to. Bear in mind we have not heard Ryan's side so far, making the situation hard to call.