Nydekore Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 (edited) Do not assign for grading, if you do I will be stealing your femur.https://docs.google.com/document/d/1V2pVE3PeT1pVsrJRzLEqwfHaGuBgjMSIiS3dkzvPGeg/edit?usp=sharing Edited October 25, 2022 by Nydekore Former: Deputy Head of Research | MTF Nu-7 Captain x2 | SCPRP Super Admin | MTF O-1 Major Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazza Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 6 hours ago, Nydekore said: Do not assign for grading, if you do I will be stealing your femur.https://docs.google.com/document/d/1V2pVE3PeT1pVsrJRzLEqwfHaGuBgjMSIiS3dkzvPGeg/edit?usp=sharing im going to grade it and you wont be able to steal my femur Freedom at last. Former: Assistant Inspector, Head of Longshot, Research Assistant Supervisor & Operations Supervisor, G.O.C. Officer & Head of bulldozers, CI COL, EOI D-2, DJ Former: Scout Captain, Second Lieutenant, Senior Crewman, Storm Commando Captain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Head Admin Weiss Posted October 25, 2022 Head Admin Share Posted October 25, 2022 For the purposes of ████████. This document has been assigned for grading.By order of O5-3 Secure. Contain. Protect. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piller Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 1 hour ago, Weiss said: For the purposes of ████████.This document has been assigned for grading.By order of O5-3 Secure. Contain. Protect. The Ethics Committee also feels that the review and grading of this document is important to a deeper understanding of morality and supports this order. 1 SCP-RP Head of Staff | Ethics Committee Chairman Former Nu-7 VCMDR l Former GenSec CPT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnus Rose Posted October 25, 2022 Share Posted October 25, 2022 Test idea - 22/25 - This test was an experiment to check the intelligence on 682, i believe. As I see it, a good idea to check its whole intellectual and chess is a good way to express this. The test idea could be more well thought out, couldn't really see whole concept. Maybe add some other ways to check its intelligence? Just a pinpoint.Grammar - 22/25 - Really good spelling. Could only see some minor mistakes, for example punctuation. Another example of a mistake is when you added "2d render" instead of "2d rendering", It can cause confusion while reading.Presentation/format - 17/25 - The highlighting behind the text created an unsatisfying feeling when reading, furthermore space out sentences and use a better font.Quality/length 21/25 - The quality and length is generally high. I like how you used the effect of something that did not happen to increase the quality.Overall 82/100 1 Research Assistant Manager | Research Field Agent Bourbon OA2 | Professor RRA Current: Moderator, Event team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts