Jump to content

Grizz80

Member
  • Posts

    58
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Grizz80

  1. Writing/Grammar: 10/20 There are very few grammar mistakes and punctuation mistakes. Overall, everything looks great; very detailed sentences. The MAJOR mistake that you made is that you copied the background research from the wiki and made it 2 pages which is, at that point, not allowed. Test Idea/Execution: 21/20 Your ideas and execution are phenomenally done. You have done an excellent job explaining what happened. Format: 19/20 The format is great and original. The font and text size are perfect for reading. There was a good amount of pictures that explained the test perfectly. Length: 20/20 The length is great. 9 pages long, all filled with text. Great job! Lore: 20/20 Everything checks out with 610's and 012's lore. The test is explained, and it doesn't seem far-fetched. Amazing job! Wanderer's Library Archivist Point: 1/1 (This is my personal point, giving it to the document that I enjoyed. If you get this point, it means you made a phenomenal document [90+]) Total score: 91/100 This is a phenomenal document. You did a amazing job. Try writing you own background research next time!
  2. Writing/Grammar: 16/20 There are a few grammar mistakes. You misspelled some words and capitalized words that shouldn't be. Test Idea/Execution: 18/20 Your ideas and execution are very interesting. You have done a good job explaining what happened. Format: 17/20 The format is nice and original. The font and text size are perfect for reading. You should have added more pictures, it would help the reader better understand what happened during testing. Also there is blank pages which are unnecessary. Length: 17/20 The length is decent. It could have been longer, but I don't think it was needed. Lore: 20/20 Everything checks out with 354 lore. The test is explained, and it doesn't seem far-fetched. Good job! Wanderer's Library Archivist Point: 0/1 (This is my personal point, giving it to the document that I enjoyed. If you get this point, it means you made a phenomenal document [90+]) Total score: 88/100 This is a great document. You did a amazing job. Keep up the good work!
  3. In Game Name: Grizz Steam ID (Ex. STEAM_0:1:91255427): STEAM_0:0:227035333 Discord ID (Ex. Pinbal#5433): GrizZ#9323 Squadron you are Applying for (Guardian, Engineer, Analyst): Analyst Current RP Ranks Held: Research Assistant Manager / External Agent 4 Has anyone recommended you to apply for the RRH program? (If not, it's fine): Cryptonus If applying for Analyst please link notable test-logs here: https://gaminglight.com/forums/topic/93776-scp-096-psychological-research/ <-- On the Wanderers Library https://gaminglight.com/forums/topic/94097-scp-049-biological-research/ How many Warns do you have? (With Screenshot Proof): 0 Why do you want to join the Red Right Hand team: Mostly because of the RP possible with RHH. With level 5 clearance, I would have so many possibilities for writing amazing documents. I love being a researcher. In July, I decided to start playing SCPRP. I immediately joined research because I am a biology nerd. Very quickly, I rose through the ranks, making phenomenal documents. One of the documents I made, involving 096, made it to the Wanderers Library, which was my goal from the beginning. After some time, I made it to the senior researcher position. Some command members "forced" me to apply for command. I got accepted, and after a week I got promoted to RS. The point is, I LOVE RESEARCH. I love testing on SCPs and doing documents. This job, in some ways, is the dream job I wanted when I joined research. Why should we accept you: You should accept me because of my knowledge, activity, and friendliness. First and foremost is my knowledge. The main reason I have risen to this position is my knowledge. I'm a biology nerd. I love and adore biology. That's why I joined research. With my biology knowledge, I explained SCP 096 with real-life science and it made sense. That's why I am featured in the Wanderers Library. Imagine what more I can do with the position of RRH Analyst. Activity is also a big factor. I can spend around 6 to 8 hours on the server. My time-zone (CET) can be a problem sometimes. But it doesn't get in the way of being active even if there are very few people on. And last but not least, my empathy toward others. I enjoy joking around and chit-chatting with others. I love socializing, participating in group activities, and having fun in general. I made many friends playing on the server, and I don't plan to stop. The RHH position would help a lot with that, and with the other stated facts.
  4. Your log has been assigned for grading! Expect a grade in 1-3 days!
  5. Your log has been assigned for grading! Expect a grade in 1-3 days!
  6. Your log has been assigned for grading! Expect a grade in 1-3 days!
  7. Your log has been assigned for grading! Expect a grade in 1-3 days!
  8. Your log has been assigned for grading! Expect a grade in 1-3 days!
  9. Writing/Grammar: 19.5/20 There are very few grammar mistakes with punctuation. Overall, everything looks great; very detailed sentences. Test Idea/Execution: 18/20 Your ideas and execution are phenomenally done. You have done an excellent job explaining what happened. Its a bit simple but its executed very well. Good job! Format: 20/20 The format is nice and original. The font and text size are perfect for reading. There was a good amount of pictures that explained the situation perfectly. Length: 18/20 The length is decent. It could have been longer, but I don't think it was needed. Lore: 20/20 Everything checks out with 049-2's and 012's lore. The test is explained, and it doesn't seem far-fetched. Good job! Wanderer's Library Archivist Point: 1/1 (This is my personal point, giving it to the document that I enjoyed. If you get this point, it means you made a phenomenal document [90+]) Total score: 96.5/100 This is a phenomenal document. You did a amazing job for an AR. Keep up the good work!
  10. Your log has been assigned for grading! Expect a grade in 1-3 days!
  11. Your log has been assigned for grading! Expect a grade in 1-3 days!
  12. Your log has been assigned for grading! Expect a grade in 1-3 days!
  13. Your log has been assigned for grading! Expect a grade in 1-3 days!
  14. Writing/Grammar: 12/20 There are little to no grammar mistakes. The only thing is you sentence formation. Instead of "write about an incident that took place on // in which" you could have written it like "write about an incident that occurred on // during which". The MAJOR mistake that you made is that you copied the background research from the wiki which is not allowed unless you mention it some where in your document! Test Idea/Execution: 16/20 I'm confused. You had a question that stated that you wanted to see 035's abilities. The next thing is the incident report where the D class that was cleaning the chamber was attacked and was killed because of 035's dangerous abilities. I am led to believe that YOU caused the incident. Try not to mix up the incident reports and test logs. You should have added pictures. It would help the reader better understand what happened during testing. Format: 15/20 I don't like it when someone is using a pre-made format. Try making your own with some inspiration from other docs. The font and text size are good for reading. You mixed up the size and font for the background, likely because you copied from the wiki. In addition, the lack of images makes your document bland. Length: 15/20 The length is a bit short. You could have included an audio log or some images from the incident to fill the short text. Lore: 20/20 Everything checks out with 035's lore. The "incident" is explained, and it doesn't seem far-fetched. Good job! Wanderer's Library Archivist Point: 0/1 (This is my personal point, giving it to the document that I enjoyed. If you get this point, it means you made a great document [90+]) Total score: 78/100 Try writing you own background research next time! Other than that you did a good job. Keep up the work!
  15. Writing/Grammar: 14/20 There are a few grammar mistakes. You did not putting commas in some places as well as "the" where it needs to be. Also the background is copied from the wiki which is not allowed unless you mention it some where in your document. Test Idea/Execution: 20/20 I like that you included 2 tests in one document. Your ideas and execution are phenomenally done. You have done an excellent job explaining what happened. Great job! Format: 18/20 The format is nice, its very unique. The font and text size are perfect for reading. Length: 17/20 The length is decent. It could have been longer, but I don't think it was needed. Lore: 19/20 Everything checks out with 009's lore. The test is explained, and it doesn't seem far-fetched. Including multiple tests a great idea. Good job! Wanderer's Library Archivist Point: 0/1 (This is my personal point, giving it to the document that I enjoyed. If you get this point, it means you made a phenomenal document [90+]) Total score: 88/100 This is a great document. You did a amazing job. Just try writing you own background research next time!
  16. +support This is a great idea. It will definitely encourage people to train more people.
  17. +++ Support The most active guy on the research. He has so much experience because I taught him very well . Very funny and smart guy.
  18. Writing/Grammar: 14/20 There are quite a few grammar and writing mistakes. You missed an apostrophe in some words, as well as not putting commas in some places. Also, "Most sour" can be written as "Sourest". You capitalized some words that shouldn't be. Everything else is fine. Test Idea/Execution: 16/20 The test idea was interesting and original. You executed and explained it perfectly. You could have used some pictures, but I see you didn't know. This is good for someone who is a JR. Format: 12/20 The format is ok, it isn't anything special. You could have colored some words like "JR , D-6741" and also used the bolding tool. I like that you used the lines to separate the log. I recommend you make a document next time. it has so many tools and abilities to make your test log better. Length: 16/20 The length of the log is fine, you could have added more background information. Lore: 17/20 Everything checks out with 999's lore. The test is explained, and it doesn't seem far-fetched. Including four types of candy is a great idea. Good job! Wanderer's Library Archivist Point: 0/1 (This is my personal point, giving it to the document that I enjoyed. If you get this point, it means you made a great document) Total score: 75/100 This is a great document for someone who is a junior researcher. I suggest you make a document next time. Good job!
  19. Writing/Grammar: 15/20 There are noticeable grammar mistakes as well as writing mistakes. You used lowercase "i" instead of capital "I" in your document. Also, there are a few places where you missed the comma. Test Idea/Execution: 10/20 This isn't the place for your character's background. You should post your test logs here, so that's why you get minus points. But besides that, it's great character lore. Format: 18/20 The format is really nice. It reminds me of a real foundation document. The text is readable and the font used is nice. Also, the use of pictures is appreciated. Length: 17/20 The length is decent. It could have been longer, but I don't think it was needed. It's all filled with rich text. Good job! Lore: 20/20 The lore is what brings this document to light. Your description of the character is amazing. It's believable and doesn't seem farfetched. Great job! Wanderer's Library Archivist Point: 0/1 (This is my personal point, giving it to the document that I enjoyed. If you get this point, it means you made a phenomenal document) Total score: 75/100 You made a good document describing your character, but this place is for test logs. Overall, you described your character very well!
  20. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P1RKC_GceF81UfF8oh38C66xQBsKtTycGGNRzKNWNic/edit?usp=sharing
  21. Writing/Grammar: 19.5/20 There are very few grammar mistakes. Overall, everything looks great; very detailed sentences. Test Idea/Execution: 20/20 I like that you included 2 test logs in one document. Your ideas and execution are phenomenally done. You have done an excellent job explaining what happened. Format: 18/20 The format is nice, remind me of a official SCP Document. The font and text size are perfect for reading. You should have added more pictures, it would help the reader better understand what happened during testing. Length: 20/20 The length is great. 9 pages long, all filled with text. Great job! Lore: 20/20 I really like the proposal to change the object class of an SCP. You have given a valid reason for the change, with the evidence and testing to prove it. The lore checks out; everything presented matches the behavior of 098. Amazing job! Wanderer's Library Archivist Point: 1/1 (This is my personal point, giving it to the document that I enjoyed. If you get this point, it means you made a great document) Total score: 98.5/100 This is a phenomenal document. You did a amazing job. Keep up the good work!
  22. +++Support One of the best guys in research.
  23. +support Always on and is a great guy. Also very smart.
  24. +Support Great guy, I always see him on the server.
×
×
  • Create New...