NotPriceless

o7

Writing/Grammar: 17/25 - Overall, there are only a very few grammar mistakes. The main things I noticed are you put “RIS unite” instead of RIS unit, “Clearly” should have a comma after it, SCP-610 in the notes section shouldn’t have a comma after it, and lastly, there is a spot where you added too many spaces between words. Test Idea: 16/25 - This is an interesting test idea. Format: 12/25 - There is a table at the top that I think you may have forgotten to fill out. The font looks nice but the paper is just black and white which is a little straining on the eyes sometimes. Overall, this paper is average, and with a little more effort into the look, easy points could be added here. Quality and length 9/25 - The paper length is a little short and it would be nice to see a little more added to it. There are only about 180 words of actual information and I feel this is a little low for a test log. I think a good way to extend the paper would be adding background research on all the SCPs in your test. Bonus points: 1/1 - I will give you a few bonus points because I have noticed you put out quite a bit of paper on the forums. Overall 55/100 - If there was a little more effort put into the papers this grade would raise quite a bit. I suggested making quality papers over the quantity of papers.

In-Game Name: Price Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:87970827 Current Research Rank: Senior Researcher Foundation Test Log(s) (graded 8+/10 only): Your Operations Advisor Overseer, has informed you there is a group of insurgents collecting foundation data at a field operating base on the surface. They are armed and well secured. How would you approach it? (100+ words): The key information to scout for is the type of threat, the number of threats, and the type of information they are gathering. Once there is an answer to those three questions, it is time to act. If there was a cyber breach, the first step would be to cut off their access to the information. The next step shouldn't be going in guns blazing, that would just waste foundation personnel and resources or even blow the whole operation. If the field operating base is enclosed within a building, amnestic or a type of toxic gas could be pumped in through the ventilation, effectively ending the threat and allowing Mobile Task Force (MTF) personnel equipped with gas masks to enter the operating base with little to no casualties from the foundation. If the base were open and outside, it would be a little bit more challenging to solve. The information would most likely be backed up somewhere within the foundations(should be avoided), so rocket-propelled explosives could be an effective course of action. The first step would be to set up a sniper team somewhere in clear view of the operating base to allow them to give effective callouts to the ground team. The first step would be to rocket the non-essential sections of the operating base to attempt to save the data as best as possible. Next, the sniper team would be able to pick off the higher-value targets (higher threat) while giving intel to the ground team, allowing them to clear the operating base with the utmost efficiency. This would allow the foundation to search the area to check if the insurgents have sent out any of the data. If data has been sent to another locations the recovery of that data would then take priority. There is a strange SCP that calls himself the “targeter”. When the name of another individual is said within earshot of the “targeter” the “targeter” will teleport to the individual that has had their name said, and run off. How would you suggest the foundation approach apprehension and / or termination of this individual? (100+ Words): Testing should be held off until we get a basic understanding of this object. The "targeter" is clearly sentient and likely a male due to the question stating "calls himself". This could lead to the question of how many are there and whether is there a female "targeter". The first step should be setting up a field observation site around the object to ensure the safety of individuals involved in this mission. Class-D personnel should be transported to the observation site and briefed on the few questions they should ask. First, do not say someone's name or your own. Second, ask if the object is willing to work with the foundation. Next, ask if the object has the intent to harm. Lastly, ask if the object has any other abilities he didn't state before. The object could lie or just flat-out kill the Class-D. However, for the sake of the question, the object answered the questions, but the truth factor is not known. The next step should be the transportation of the entity to an on-site containment cell. The room should be a humanoid containment cell fitted with cameras, soundproofing, and no internal speakers. The object should be fitted with a tracking device implanted under the skin, if it has skin, or around the object's neck. The containment door should be the airlock leading to a soundproof outer containment cell before entering a heavy containment cell door similar to the ones in SCP-173 containment. Further testing should happen on-site. The first test suggestion would be to, place 2 Class-D with the same first name into the cell and have one of them say their name. This would allow us to see who the object would target in that situation and what the object does to the victim it teleports to. This could also test if the containment cell doors are able to hold off against the objects attempts to run away. If the foundation is wanting to terminate this SCP we would first need to understand how the object's teleport ability works. This would allow us to place a class-D into the incinerator when it is powered off and have someone state said class-Ds name. The object would then teleport to the class-D and the incinerator should be powered on. Another option is to have a Class-D in a helicopter jump out while another person says their name. The object would then teleport to the class-D in the sky and fall to its death(hopefully). An abandoned camp site has been discovered on the surface, hidden incredibly well within the brush. There are documents, newspaper scraps, as well as an old laptop with unknown data being transferred to a suspicious I.P. address. How do you react? (100+ Words): The first step should be to recon the surrounding area to ensure nothing is watching the camp or someone hasn't set up traps around or on the site. Next, the documents, paper scraps, and laptops should be removed from the locations in case the owners return to that location. Once I am far enough away from the campsite, I would mark down the IP address on a notepad to save for later and attempt to stop any data from being transferred. If this was successful I would return to the foundation with the evidence I collected and get to work on tracking the IP. The IP could lead to almost anything, but for the sake of getting to a final resolution, the IP address leads to somewhere outside the foundation. The device linked to the IP address should be located and handled by Mobile Task Force personnel.

Name: Price SteamID: STEAM_0:0:87970827 Current Rank: Senior Researcher Time in Research (Estimate): I would say around 80ish hours if not more. I had a week of playtime before I joined research and I have almost 3 weeks now and most of my time is in research. I will admit I should be more active but I plan to be way more active very soon. Why do you believe you should be in Research Command?(100 word requirement): I just want to start off by stating why I want to be a Research Command member. I don't feel like I have been in research that long, but in the time that I have, I enjoyed the experience as well as the community within research. The one thing that I noticed is that research kind of needs command members. I am not saying that the command in research now is bad, I am just saying that seeing a research command will likely get more players active in research, and I think we all want that. There are many reasons I see myself fit for a command position within research. I spend a lot of my time in research and in-game interacting with the community. The community is very entertaining to be around and makes research recruitment agent one of the jobs that allows me to talk to the new members of research and help them at the stage that is awkward. Overall, I think that the experiences I have had in research, good and bad, would allow me to help the future of research. What can you bring to the table that others can't? (100 word requirement): I am unsure of the competition; therefore I can only really speak about my strengths and what makes me who I am. My personality makes me fairly easy to get along with even if we do not share common interests. If I have a problem with someone, I understand how to handle it in a professional way without causing drama for a third party. I believe another trait that makes me stand out is my ability to take and give criticism. It is very difficult to hurt my feelings or make me feel offended in any type of way, so criticism never bothered me and I understand most people do not mean it in a harsh way. There are times when I will joke around with people, but if someone needs criticism on a project they are working on, I do not mind telling them my opinion. I keep the attitude that it is better to tell someone if something might not be the best idea rather than allow them to waste their time on something non-constructive (within reason). This does not mean I am rude to a person, if they ask for my opinion I will give it to them in the nicest way I can. What would you do to better Research and increase activity? (100 word requirement): I want to start off by saying me and Blight made a game out of who could train the most researchers for the week. He won by quite a bit; however we got a combined total of around 21 people to join research in 1 week. With that being said, being a research command member would not stop me from starting small challenges with people to assist in the more laborious tasks like training people. I think adding that small competition pushes not only me but the other parties to be more active in research and gain new recruits. I can also assist in mass tests, get research to do group tests, and continue to show lower-ranking research members the ropes to testing. Note: I just want to mention that I have enjoyed the recent activity of research overall and I hope to work will all of you soon.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1n8P828bdR2OBDeAA8pXztHM0yJKmVfXzpCifResANdw/edit?usp=sharing Some of the data(mainly from the analysis) was difficult to find and had to be fabricated quite a bit. I tried my best to research more on the topic but it was all difficult to find. Hope you like it

+ Support He is entertaining to work with. He is a good leader. He is also on almost everyday so activity isn't a problem W maintenance low command member

Document Here I had fun writing this. Hope you enjoy it

Document Here