Jump to content

Blight Farmer

Member
  • Posts

    13
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Blight Farmer

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Blight Farmer's Achievements

Apprentice

Apprentice (3/14)

  • One Month Later
  • Collaborator
  • Reacting Well
  • First Post
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. 10/10 length of the paper. A 10 min video very nice 4/5 Terminology (How fancy do you sound). due to how the interview is structured, no terminology is really needed 10/10 Grammar (Is it readable). The audio log was easy to follow 7/10 Testing Idea (How good was the test idea). a good and fun idea to go over, 16/20 Execution (How well was the test executed). A straight forward interview! not much else to add 8/10 Format (How nice is your format). its pretty generic minus the video part 10/10 Lore Follows the mr.fish lore on the doc 7/10 Engagement (How engaging was your paper to read) had some hard times and it kinda dragged on but over all its not bad. 5/5 Use of pictures Its a video so that is ... a lot of pictures. think that counts lol TOTAL: 77/100
  2. 7/10 length of the paper. Another below-average size paper. Once again bumped up a bit from the average grade I would give due to how much you put out but id like to still see more 2/5 Terminology (How fancy do you sound). Nothing fancy at all, nothing below average. Mostly just par for the course. 10/10 Grammar (Is it readable). No issues at all, read easy. 10/10 Testing Idea (How good was the test idea). Overall a solid test idea. It worked and functioned well. 15/20 Execution (How well was the test executed). I feel as if it lacked in a lot of areas, You could have gone a lot more in-depth in a lot of areas such as WHY 079 was acting this way with 999 or how is 999 able to affect computers. 8/10 Format (How nice is your format). Overall nice and easy to read my only gripe is that I have to go to a dif doc to read the log. Next time I would make it once doc overall. 10/10 Lore All of it is completely acurite to the lore of both SCP’s 10/10 Engagement (How engaging was your paper to read) a short and easy read 5/5 Use of pictures very good use overall no complaints. Overall Score 67/100
  3. 8/10 length of the paper: Its a tad shorter than most papers, That being said your general output is much higher than most people so it averages out to me. 3/5 Terminology (How fancy do you sound): Overall its average. Nothing too fancy but its not dumbed down leading to a nice light reading. 10/10 Grammar (Is it readable): no issues it was all smooth. 10/10 Testing Idea (How good was the test idea): While not a test (kind of rendering this invalid) I'll count this and execution off how the idea in general. With that said I haven't seen a D-class breach with some SCP influence behind it done before. For that I think its a 10/10 idea! 14/20 Execution (How well was the test executed): I do have some major issues with how this was executed though. You hint at some SCP-035 involvement and then never back it up. This might be due to the fact that it is involved in another doc that I haven't seen or read (Tried to take a look around but didn't find anything, I apologize if I missed it). Even so, I shouldn't have to read another doc unless it is attached to this one otherwise how would I know. On top of that even if this is the start of something to do with 035 why would he be prevalent at this point. Nothing else about this doc indicates 035 involvement. the inclusion of that section, especially that early on really brings the doc down for me. Other then that the rest of it is mostly fine with minor flaws. 8/10 Format (How nice is your format): I like the computer format but it is kind of jarring that you then swap to the typewriter format. Other then that no complaints 10/10 Lore: I feel like I've deducted enough points from execution as my only issues in lore are the same ones in execution. 10/10 Engagement (How engaging was your paper to read): It was short and able to keep engaged the whole time partly due to that. While at times it felt jarring to read due to it flopping around a bit, it overall read well. 1/5 Use of pictures: There are no pictures, I don't feel as if a doc always NEEDs pictures per say but you do talk about camera feeds and such, so it would be nice to see those. Overall Score: 74/100
  4. First thing is first *Clears Throat* AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA. Thanks, I needed that. I worked REALLY hard on this doc and am rly proud to show it off. I almost didn't go along with posting it due to some of the content being to dark and gritty for a SCP-RP Gmod server... I digress though. I cant tell you how strongly I feel about this document and I hope you all like it but that being said I feel the need to issue a CONTENT WARNING Like I said this doc gets darker then most docs on here so I feel the need to include this for some of the people who may not want to read a transcript of a man mentality loosing it. along with that themes of mental illness. Strong language is also sprinkled throughout but its the F word no more then 5 times but I still felt it was worth a mention. anyway without further adieu please enjoy. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CUQOY_lXia1fK_yrnVifO1x0aVerE4MAMDksNAUdKx8/edit
  5. +support Great dude see him around a lot IMO could not do better -Rep I beat you trainee so your app is invalid /j On the real ive known price for the whole time ive been in the branch and I personally feel like he would make an amazing fit!
  6. 8/10 length of the paper: Its an average-sized paper. Got no complaints here! 4/5 Terminology (How fancy do you sound): I love neuroscience, Its my fucking jam so hearing all those neurotransmitters being talked about was very nice. That being said I did feel as if some of them were tossed into the paper with no real follow-up. 10/10 Grammar (Is it readable): I had an easy time reading it. Some minor punctuation errors here and there but overall nothing I noticed. Great Job! 10/10 Testing Idea (How good was the test idea): Going to the root of the cause and asking “Why” Is always the first thing we should do when looking at an SCP, the document on 012 has no testing logs so seeing a test that tries to answer WHY its effect takes place is an amazing idea. 15/20 Execution (How well was the test executed): Overall I liked it. The process and the way of measuring its effects on the brain were well done. My only gripe is that you don't go into how it was done. All you say is that they were taken to a neurotransmitting center. Id love to go into the process of how/why this is. In your picture, you show someone with electrodes attached to their head. Expand on that! Your science doesn't need to be all factual and based in reality it just has to fit into the scp world. Other then this the paper is amazing. This is just the one area I feel that the paper is lacking. 10 /10 Format (How nice is your format): Im not a fan of dark background paper usually. A lot of the time its then used with white text/highlights to make it pop out but ends up looking pretty bad. But this I am a huge fan of! It is amazing on the eyes, the logos all around don't conflict with your paper and the format works to break it up nicely using gaps in the paper. My only issue (that I'm not going to reduce points for bc its so minor) is that page 3 felt empty. 10/10 Lore: SCP-012’s lore is a bit bare bones so there isn't much to go off of. I only have one small issue and that's with the infrared lights. While the doc itself lists nothing about the activation of SCP-012’s properties. Most media depicting 012 goes off of proximity to the object not sight. 10/10 Engagement (How engaging was your paper to read): I was invested the whole time. My ADHD ass could read this without getting distracted so enough said. 5/5 Use of pictures: The use of pictures was engaging and always prevalent to the topics you where talking about. Nothing felt out of place and images were even used to increase help talk about the points you were making. Some of the best use of images I've seen in a doc! Overall Score 82/100 Notes: Overall a great doc! Im happy I could have this as my first grading and can't wait to have more of your papers end up on my desk! On top of that, I love the subject. Id love to see you expand on your 012 research and find out things like why it causes the brain to react this way etc etc.
  7. WOOPS! just updated that for you, sorry forgot to set that to public
  8. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_Pdq63D4-i3MFXyK3Y3M9hBn3iMB-gE78HBDi6Mc0aw/edit This is it, thank you for your time!
  9. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qMhnBl48pA0daky8ZZWVU7Hthr_1VNbcXT9qJyZ49bw/edit?usp=sharing this is the doc w all the questions
  10. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUWFrsGp4qLkK9WMygdXXYto3WA16E802EdxNk-f0zM/edit I feel like I could do a lot more with this but for the sake of getting it out the door so I don't get sucked in again here it is. by far my longest doc, I hope you enjoy
  11. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JkwKUXhyn3sCTYdTFlLk-Y0p3gclJIES5MguVRP-rW8/edit?usp=sharing
  12. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OxP9_5THS87CvSnNnn9iR-onkD8pf84Nwttlt2VzDbs/edit Worked on this doc w Rascal before he went on a LOA
×
×
  • Create New...