scotched

+support bros a topG, is SF already (G9) so topG what coloor is ur bugatti + all women + all men + married to ozzie + african

-/+ support i do think you'd be great at the job. but... -application, not detailed enough.

+support what is this app i dont even know anymore

-Support -No idea who you are -App is short as hell -Very mingey Its one of the only rules for your app -Event is a SET+ Event but you knew that, -Event has little to no detail -Abuses level 3 keycard on E11.

1. Questions 2. Your In-game: scotched 3. Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:580729723 4. The admin's name in-game: Wade 5. The admin's steam name (If you know it): Wade 6. What warning did you receive: FailrRP | Cuffing SCP-173 without rolling 7. Evidence of the warn (REQUIRED): 8. Why do you think this warn was false: The Warn wasn't false I deserved it, but now I think I should get this warn removed because I have been much better with the rules, and got the hang of them and for this warn to be on my record of gaminglight just isn't the greatest, and I have learned the rules of recontaining SCP's now and this incident never happened to me again, since that date, and I genially think I deserve a second chance and I am 100% sure that this will NEVER happen again, I promise that. As well as for me having this warn makes D5 look bad because of me while I was on the job. All I want is forgiveness and I've grown since then and that warn doesn't show who i am really. 9. Any extra information: free the homie

these guys are stinky and are in special forces

link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1td9FSXQ7-G_7uqUmgYxe_AgDcVcrEru5SZ2beCMYkgA/edit post ur feedback!

link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zWhxEoUGmvWgQv12kS8d8tGg-X0hqhPFr-dkgpq1XvQ/edit post your feedback!!!!

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WzxKqf4UULE8l4_vQuok-fjmMe5xmJPtwPDtpvX9yJ0/edit post feedback!!!!!

In-Game Name: scotched Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:580729723 Current Research Rank: AR Foundation Test Log(s) (graded 8+/10 only): https://gaminglight.com/forums/topic/92920-scp-999-x-scp-049-cross-test/#comment-632790 Your Operations Advisor Overseer, has informed you there is a group of insurgents collecting foundation data at a field operating base on the surface. They are armed and well secured. How would you approach it? (100+ words): I will alert Mobile Task Force that on surface that there is Chaos Insurgency attempting to collect data from the foundation and once they get this information they will attempt to stop it and if they do actually stop the Chaos Insurgency from taking the data I will make my way up on surface (with permission from Advisor Overseer) to check the computers if all data is secured and if data were stolen I will alert the Advisor Overseer and try to retrieve the data back while not being alerted by the Chaos Insurgency so that no leaked data etc, are stolen and hacked by the chaos insurgency. There is a strange SCP that calls himself the “targeter”. When the name of another individual is said within earshot of the “targeter” the “targeter” will teleport to the individual that has had their name said, and run off. How would you suggest the foundation approach apprehension and / or termination of this individual? (100+ Words): Pretty simple way for this, for the method to avoid being terminated or stolen by the "targetter" I will say suggest to talk in comms (TS) so that the "targetter" cannot hear you from a close distance and attempt to terminate, you will also be giving each other codenames such as, "Agent Quakers" Instead "Sixx" to avoid termination of the SCP, now if this method still causes the termination of the individuals they will have to talk in there respective comms for safety hazard of this "targetter" until further notice of termination or re-containment. The counters of "targetter" that are spotted by the RFA (Research Field Agent) or CTF, CA etc... Will be DIRECTLY reported to the Mobile Task Force and foundation as quickly as possible, or to any Foundation Forces. An abandoned camp site has been discovered on the surface, hidden incredibly well within the brush. There are documents, newspaper scraps, as well as an old laptop with unknown data being transferred to a suspicious I.P. address. How do you react? (100+ Words): First of all, we will set up camps, or watch towers at the further distances for Cryptography Task Force, Covert Agents and Research Field Agents. For the safety of everyone we will make the CTF stay on ground to blend in with the nature as since they are mostly camo and they will make callouts for CA and RFA, next I would make covert agents stay on top of watch towers calling out any suspicions of high target personnel etc... The RFA will disguise and blend in since we have the body groups for it and will attempt to sneak and retrieve data as quietly and efficiently as possible so that we are not caught and spotted and the mission is a fail. Once the RFA are in we will grab the documents and newspaper scraps and will stash it, then one of them will go to the laptop and check where the suspicious I.P address is being transferred too. Once the RFA has gotten this information and all items are secured they will walk back to the camp built by CTF and store them there, once later we will raid the base and terminate all GOI that are in the base. Then we plan another attack once we find out where the other base is. There we can search and find any useful information towards the Foundation.

@Kevlar_ ha loser

document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oHQAhdFYRFRCjw2Ybc-E6-rpAJvFeLyA5TY1D8YK5nM/edit?usp=sharing Post your feedback!!!

ayyy that my birthday g +support

bro its like this cc was made for me

lets gooooo

Yes, well it was inspired by Gaminglight ImperialRP servers

WH0!? +Support

What are you suggesting? - To lower the transfer rank to SGT How would this change better the server? - This will change better for players, lets say they are the rank of NCO+ and they see a battalion that they see that looks really good and have been it before and want to play in it, so at the rank of lets say, SSGT people want to join a branch but don't want to start from the bottom completely again, so most of them burn themself out to WO/2LT just to transfer and then they retire from the server because they burned themselves out to transfer to a battalion they really wanted to join. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - Absolutely not, 0 disadvantages. Who would this change mostly benefit? - Well, it won't burn players out to get to a rank that they want, and they can ENJOY to play the branch that they want to join.

So I have a suggestion that may get lots of -supports and +supports. REMOVAL/NERF OF SCP-8286 Here is my explanation: The reason why SCP-8286 should be removed is, he is simply to overpowered. After he identity swaps with you, you have to wait 6 minute NLR which is bullshit, then you get 1 shotted by him which also isn't fair, and then the moment you say a word, its metagaming, although SCP-8286 is a really fun character to play as, he is completely bullshit and should get removed, or big time nerfed. It is completely unfair to go up against him, so at the moment you say something and it is metagame you get pulled into a sit and get lectured by 8286 why it is metagame, now I have never got formal or verbal warning by a staff about SCP-8286, but most foundation personnel that don't play that SCP can agree that it is completely unfair. You guys should just remove him and bring SCP-457, which wasn't overpoweredly stupid like 8286.

o7

yes i know and i apologize for not knowing, i can confirm with you tho it will not happen again

Your In-game Name: MTF D5 FTO SGT scotched ZETA Your SteamID: STEAM_0:0:580729723 The admin's name in-game: Wade What warning did you receive: FailRP| didnt roll to cuff 173 When did you receive this warning: because i didnt roll to cuff 173 Please give a description of the situation that led to the warning: I genially did not know that u had to roll to cuff 173 as it was my first time actually cuffing him and i thought that all you needed was 3 people looking at him then cuff, I have been actively playing the server for no more then a week, so I still am not to "memorized" over the rules, and 173 did tell me to roll in chat (after checking in the sit) I did not realize he typed it out since SCP-354 was right behind us and I was trying to hurry, please unwarn me it was a genuine mistake will not happen again. Why do you think this warn was false: Because I am fairly new to the server I have been playing it actively for a week Evidence the warning is false: Don't got the evidence the situation was to fast for me to clip

Your name: scotched Your Discord ID name (EX: Igneous#3706): scotched#6455 Your Discord ID code (EX: 204661777512923136): dont know it Which discord server were you warned on? SCPRP What was the reason for your warn (if you know it)? The reason was FailRP| didnt roll to cuff 173 Why do you deserve to be unwarned? I deserve to be unwarned because, I genially did not know that u had to roll to cuff 173 as it was my first time actually cuffing him and i thought that all you needed was 3 people looking at him then cuff, I have been actively playing the server for no more then a week, so I still am not to "memorized" over the rules, and 173 did tell me to roll in chat (after checking in the sit) I did not realize he typed it out since SCP-354 was right behind us and I was trying to hurry, please unwarn me it was a genuine mistake will not happen again.