.jpg.4a92782be689d58097f88cf2c809c6c1.jpg)
-
Posts
437 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Important Post
GMod Tutorials
Knowledge Base
Posts posted by David
-
-
+ Support
It would take a few hours to code, maybe less. But it would be a new, fun gun system.
-
On 11/3/2022 at 11:08 AM, Trumpo said:
+support
my heart will always be with Rockford to many memories for me.
agreed
-
-Support
Ask him to put it down
-
I understand that they don't have access to all the gun files to the guns on the server, but for the ones they have, it would only take an hour tops to fix this.
-
-Support
I think the server has enough content
-
2
-
-
What do you want to see? - I would like to see SMT change the code for their gun files.
Why should we add it? - Because when trying to aim down sights with weapons, the iron sights don't align with where the bullets are going. For example:
The cyan-colored crosshair is actually where the bullets are going. It isn't shown, but the iron sights were going left to right also.
What are the advantages of having this? - Players will be able to trust the iron sights.
Who is it mainly for? - Everybody
Links to any content -
This line of code in shared.lua needs to be changed to fix this. The weapons we use right now have blowback set to false.
This is a short clip showing what true vs false looks like.
https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxreMkte36hSbMp9Sgx6rnQ1IC2G4iD6JB
-
13 hours ago, Trumpo said:
+Support
will cause more basing
-
Logan is a cool guy, +support.
-
2 minutes ago, MiniEpic said:
-Support
As SMT said since I was the negoatior first off it is COMMON SENSE as it is in the MOTD. Next you seemed like you were stalling negotiation as staff was there and we waited 5 or so minutes for a clear explanation to it. It just seemed like you wanted to waste everyone's time at the scene, NOW I am not saying you WERE DOING SO I am just saying my thought process during that negotiation.
Phil's Statement on your warn if you have already not read it, it's pretty straight forward
This really falls under Common sense, if during the negations you agreed for money for the hostage you should be letting them go. We don't have every rule written down, but this is a roleplay server and you're meant to act as you would in real life.
Since I didn't also respond to your statement on the player report : It isn't a rule to give over the hostage after I get money, but Mini Epic wanted to argue with me, so I asked a staff member to confirm.
A: No I did not want to argue with you at all, I was just stating "Give me the money, it is common sense since you dropped the money." You didn't follow that simple statement so you proceeded to make a arugement that made JMT get involved.
(Link to your player report) Also to say, metagaming with thirdperson is very common and honestly the entire server would get warned if we did enforce that simple use that was put into the server by SMT. Thank you
If it fell under common sense, they wouldn't need to make a new rule to clarify it. The whole situation is very silly, especially since you all got mad that I was trying to clarify something with a staff member. I'm so sorry you didn't get to keep us from getting 500,000 dollars in-game!
-
1
-
-
Your In-game:
David
The admin's name in-game:
Phil
The admin's steam name (If you know it):
[GL]Lord_Of_Woe
What warning did you receive:
FailRP
Evidence of the warn (REQUIRED):
Why do you think this warn was false:
I was just trying to determine if I was wrong or right about a rule. I was not intentionally trying to piss anybody off or break any rules. It is unfair that I get punished because someone got upset that I was asking a question. I am very upset about how the staff handled the report against me. I also am upset that I am getting blamed for exploiting. I had no intention AT ALL to exploit the situation. Many people are getting upset over me asking a question in A VIDEO GAME.
Any extra information:
This is what happened ->
https://medal.tv/games/garrys-mod/clips/CiyVdhJXZlOlm/d1337dC5TsZ6?invite=cr-MSxvWTcsMjY4NDA2MTAs
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, Matilda said:
As you can see in the video he was standing there for a solid 3 seconds and also didn't move even after i physgunned him. If you want more evidence @Bartholomewsaid he has more of the video then was clipped if i read it right. As you heard barth also said in the video "move", indicating that Scor obviously was in the way.
Theres nothing confirming he was afk. From what it looks like you just moved him.
-
1
-
2
-
-
- Support
Are you making a joke or are you serious?
-
+/- Support
Was Calamity talking about Matilda?
-
15 minutes ago, Matilda said:
So what happened was that Scor was body blocking the doorway out of spawn, thus making me stuck inside of spawn. Since he wasn't moving out of the way i did physgun him away. Thats my side and i dont see anything wrong with it except for me physgunning him slightly too far away.
+/- support
Is there evidence? -
+SUPPORT
This may be a long comment, but Trumpo would be the best person for the job. He is the founder of the most successful crime family in Gaminglight history; he is a Colonel in PD, he is a commander in S.W.A.T., he is a Senior Admin, he is on the event team, he is mature, he has 0 warns, and he is an intelligent person. I would honestly be baffled if he wasn’t the next Assistant Chief.
-
I understand you were trying to have fun, Incept, but it can get annoying if you and Quaked break the rules too often.
-
2 hours ago, Ecott said:
Regardless of that u still legit stalled the heck out of that whole situation of how long all gov were waiting on at the situation which took forever. No offense David but you should know better not to do that anyways of asking in the situation where in MOTD it says (weather or not it does or doesnt say offically) of handing over the hostage when u receive and pick up the money from GOV, you have been on the server long enough to know.
I am allowed to call for an admin to ask questions to prevent getting in trouble if I'm wrong. Ecott you are making this a big deal when it isn't; try to remember that you are just playing a video game.
Edit: Also, it isn't my fault that the admin wanted to hold the sit right where the situation was occurring.
I don't know if you noticed, but you're also peaking around the corner with third person, which could be considered a metagame. "No Metagame (using information that would not realistically be available to your character)" (Sec 1, Rule 7).
-
It isn't a rule to give over the hostage after I get money, but Mini Epic wanted to argue with me, so I asked a staff member to confirm.
Edit: A SUPER ADMIN confirmed that it is not a rule in the MOTD but just how the government players are trained.
-
What you want to see? - I would like to see the abolishment of using /advert assist in role-play situations.
Why should we add it? - I think it would make the flow of game play and role-play more seamless.
What are the advantages of having this? - seamless game play
Who is it mainly for? - Criminals
Links to any content -
-
What you want to see? - I would like to see the abolishment of using /advert assist in role-play situations.
Why should we add it? - I think it would make the flow of game play and role-play more seamless.
What are the advantages of having this? - seamless game play
Who is it mainly for? - Criminals
Links to any content -
-
5 minutes ago, Jimmy James said:
based on all of the evidence brought to the report, there was no screenshots of the other family shooting at SL. I'm not saying it didn't happen because it might have, but based on what we are working with on this report it only shows SL instigating fights and beans was never in any of those logs of shooting at your family. If you had a video showing the situation it might clear that up, but it hasn't been posted so it doesn't seem like it exists so we have to base it off of the logs shown above.
Nobody has video. Beans didn’t deny that he was at the fight because he was.
-
1 hour ago, Jimmy James said:
I looked through this whole situation and everybody is claiming there was a big fight between sl and umc, but I don't see any logs proving that everything does sl instigating fights with other people. To clerify, logs are evidence and so galaxy did the right thing here and made his decision based on what the logs showed. Looking at all of the screenshots provided (granted it looks life a messy situation) David instigated the fight with beans and dealt 100% of the damage while beans had a gun out but was never looking at david. While a video could clear this situation, there wasn't one provided so logs are the only evidence we have and in my opinion they support galaxy's decision to make the warn here.
You are agreeing that I can stand at a big gun fight between SL AND UMC while having my gun pointed towards it without consequences. If I’m killed its RDM.
-
5 minutes ago, Jimmy James said:
It is your responsibility to show proof the report is false, so if you fail to do so the report will be denied
I fixed it
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, galax223 said:
i have multipe SS of the logs and ill post them below but my case was not entirely self defense, this all and all was a messy sit as the logs where backed up with UMC and SL so i did the absolute best i could with what i had.
this is watto i have the correct SS i accidently snipped the wrong person lmao
Without video evidence how could you know Beans didn't shoot his gun?
Mafia Associate Skin Change - Accepted - In Progress - Completed
in Completed
Posted
What do you want to see? - I would like to see the current player model for Mafia Associate changed to this model "models/player/Suits/male_09_shirt.mdl," it is the same model but with a different head.
Why should we add it? - It would be a fresh new look, and the head would look better.
What are the advantages of having this? - More players may want to get on using the model.
Who is it mainly for? - Criminals
Links to any content - Already on the server.