+ MASSIVE SUPPORT I dug, and I dug deep. Prepare for a long slideshow.
First things first, establishing when the reporter arrived on the server.
All times mentioned shown and discussed in this reply is in EST.
Below establishes the profile picture tied with the reporter including the exact timestamp of when they finally connected to the server: 10:15:31 PM 18NOV22.
Now, to establish the different RP names that they had during the time they were on.
They logged on as ST PVT Mr Kuhn 1992 eventually changing to BIM Kuhn, MoH BIM Kuhn, and finally ST PVT GoofyLooneyTunesBugsBunny.
From here forward I will be showing each and every Player Combat where the reporter was the Instigator in chronological order.
Shortly after joining committed two counts of ARDM, but looked like they toed the line shortly thereafter as the next instance took place at least an hour later which is the next point below this one.
One count of what would be an *RDM* IF it wasn't in the middle of a SIM as per the name at the time (BIM Kuhn).
Continuing down the line are incidents taking place either involved at a PUBLIC EXECUTION (where friendly fire sometimes happens and he shoots one person accidentally) or when they were defending themselves or assisting in defending against a Bounty Hunter.
The rest of the ARDMs that take place were accidental friendly fire during an event where people have already reported there was lag/connectivity issues.
Also, as you can see in that last combat log where he was defending against a Bounty Hunter, he was pulled randomly, there were several Staff members in TeamSpeak that stated there was no ticket regarding the reporter as our Staff are like steroid-induced Cerberuses when it comes to taking tickets.
There is no evidence pointing to any valid MRDM nor valid MARDM.
Now, explicitly with just this information at hand along with the reporter's statement, there seems to be a confusing piece of information in that the warn for the ban-able offense took place at 9:40 PM 18NOV22 yet the ban took place FOUR hours later at 1:41 AM 19NOV22. Not to mention it is quite odd that an Admin would ban on behalf of a member of JMT when the reported individual is capable of banning by themselves.
On top of this, the reporter was never pulled and told what they did wrong prior to receiving their punishment which is one of the absolute basics of being a Staff member, HOWEVER we have yet to hear @KLONDU's side.
To both parties, if you have any clips in regards to the sit to provide more evidence that would be great.
In light of all that I've seen from the evidence gathered thus far, I firmly believe there was an incredulous lack of due diligence in executing the duties of a Staff member in regards the the reported individual.
EDIT: Utilizing Deep Storage and Advanced Search I was able to find evidence tied to the reporter's SteamID showing that it was NOT four hours apart between the warn and the ban it was within 60 seconds of each other.
NOTE: When it comes to bans, they are logged as disconnections stating they the player is disconnecting due to being banned with the reasoning and length.