Jump to content

Context for Non-combatants being able to defend themselves without having to be shot at first - Denied


Avatarx

Recommended Posts

Add a clause somewhere in the rules where Non-combatants can defend themselves if they are clearly going to be shot at and they are in a position where if they wait to be shot at they will lose the engagement. As well as being unable to run away

An example of where this might apply

D-class trying to climb into a medical booth to gain an angle to shoot at non-combatants inside.

A CI trying to break into a keypad locked room saying they are going to kill everyone inside.

 

Examples of where this wouldn't apply

CI chasing down a non-combatant in the halls

D-class rioting and killing all security nearby

Any scenario where FearRP would take effect

 

I'm suggesting this because it doesn't feel fair for non-combatants to basically be sentenced to death if they are stuck in a corner and have to wait to be shot at in order to fight back. There should be more context when it comes to self defence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- support

No, "Non-combatants" are called that cuz they don't shoot, not many ppl shot you

Maynard, Dclass, E4 is what hunts you down...its not like every job trys to kill Non-combatants

                                                                                               The Snipeof all Snipers
  Head Of Longshot, Major  ~  Nu7 SM G.O.C Deputy Head of Nail, CPLSVA, V4 ██████ IV E-11 SGT, La Feria

                                                                   ezgif-5-1afe476b1c.gif.2124125d4fed17d7800b46ba52c6d55b.gif                                                                                      

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Destroyer2 said:

-support 
hahha no, so basically normal CI cant even attack you + E4 are the only one + We dont always want to kill you / we can also ask you for armor

I think they removed E4's ability to kill non-combatants for no reason.

21 hours ago, Avatarx said:

Add a clause somewhere in the rules where Non-combatants can defend themselves if they are clearly going to be shot at and they are in a position where if they wait to be shot at they will lose the engagement. As well as being unable to run away

Non-combatants can fight back if attacked, or if a fellow non-combatant is captured or attacked. I don't think they need more rules.

-Support

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hex-G said:

I think they removed E4's ability to kill non-combatants for no reason.

Non-combatants can fight back if attacked, or if a fellow non-combatant is captured or attacked. I don't think they need more rules.

-Support

E4 can still kill non-combatants.

Do agree with the other part though

-Support

  • Like 1

Former:

𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐃𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 - 𝐒𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2023 at 2:20 PM, Mary said:

-Support

This suggestion basically turns them into combatants, and I see people just shooting CI and D-Class just for fun and cause issues.

 

On 2/16/2023 at 7:27 PM, opera said:

- support

No, "Non-combatants" are called that cuz they don't shoot, not many ppl shot you

Maynard, Dclass, E4 is what hunts you down...its not like every job trys to kill Non-combatants

 

Hunt:

Former: Shadow Legacy Senior Command | S.W.A.T | PD Command | State Command | C.E.R.T Command | FBI | SRT | E.M.S Command

Former: Administrator for Police RP | Forums Diplomat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...