Rex Velvet

You are wrong. DOXing is cool. Also we are still waiting for an SMT to update the aimbot to a permaban (possibly not done because the DOX ban was already perm?). Since that never happened, It brings into question the validity of the ban he received. It's also interesting that he received a total of 3 bans at the same time for 2 reasons, those reasons being aimbotting and threatening to dox. The lack of context given for why this occurred doesn't help sway my opinion towards -support. Since https://tools.gaminglight.com/profile/76561199013684864 is the only ancillary evidence you have brought forward, I am going to have to - support your - support and genuinely give a +support, pending further evidence. The threats to dox are tame and I would say his current ban time has been sufficient.

+support threatened to DOX someone

The sten, mp40, and mp9 are available to be crafted in mines, they dont need to be bought. Uzis and tec-9's can be purchased by a smuggler or supplier and have been able to be bought for a long time. I would argue that the tec-9 and uzi are the 2 most common guns on dclass CC's behind the contender. Under that impression, I would also argue ppl get guns on CC's for the convenience of not having to buy them, and therefore would have no impact on Dclass CC's being bought since your insinuation is that it would somehow be detrimental to Dclass CC sales. The only guns on my list that are exclusive to CC's are the dual berettas/tfa_csgo_elite and the deagle. Additionally, I cant speak to how dclass and Gensec came to an agreement on guns we could have, but I am curious to know the context.

+ support ctrl + f and entered the following text: 049, cuffed, cuff, restrained, and restrain. they did not yield anything regarding 049 HAVING to be fear rp'd before getting cuffed, nor any one else. Since its not explicitly stated the warn should be removed or simply reverted to a verbal.

+ support sure

+support IF Dclass get to use the longbow and riot shield otherwise its still - support

What are you suggesting? - adding an armory inside sarkic base, let us purchase medkits and armor charges (possibly have restricted to a certain class like acolyte), and allow prohpets to buy rpg ammo How would this change better the server? - adding an armory inside sarkic base will allow sarkic to have more options with guns and in turn, more flexibility in playstyle. Having the capacity to heal will make sarkic more viable in raids, and allow us to buy rockets because rpg go boom Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - I really only see an issue with buying rpg rounds. Could possibly cause a drop in frames, but since the max num of prophets is 2, Im certain it wont be significant, if at all. Who would this change mostly benefit? - sarkic Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - n/a

well considering his issue is with them running into lounge after shooting to act like they didnt do anything, having gensec weapons check ppl in the respective room seems like a solution thats already available. when they act like they're not in combat, cant blame the gensec for using a baton and weapons checker.

-support Gensec have the baton and weapon checker so it seems to be a scenario in which using that would be valid

I get the sentiment here, but I feel paying to get out of a temporary isnt that absurd when you can do so for a permanent

while I understand warn threshold bans are labeled as unappealable, I feel this situation warrants an attempt at an appeal Steam Name: Long Island Medium SteamID: STEAM_0:0:208915345 Ingame Name: Rex Velvet Ban Length: 4 weeks Admin that Banned you: console Reason for Ban: 30 warns Dispute: I have 28

Steam Name: Long Island Medium Ingame Name: Rex Velvet SteamID: STEAM_0:0:208915345 The admin's name in-game: TGKilo and Phill What warning did you receive: Mic Spam and RDM/ARDM When did you receive this warning: the year of 2020 Please give a description of the situation that led to the warning: Cant remember Why do you think this warn was false: in all seriousness these weren't false but would like them wiped pls Evidence the warning is false: N/A

I wanna know what you said too

- support | If a member is going at snar for the prices, that is a character flaw. Chances are if someone has a question about a price in regards to custom classes, they can find an answer in the pinned format post, in a previous post, or simply ask as a last resort. - support | If someone is going to spend money when they realistically cant afford it that is poor financial management on their part. - support | If a character model model is requested to be added, clarify if it counts as out of RP or not before paying if you are only willing to pay the price for changing a model so as to avoid any needless headache. + support | since it is P2W, removing it would def lower the number of ppl complaining

What are you suggesting? - Add more guns to the D class smugglers buy menu How would this change better the server? - As of right now the difference between dclass smuggler and supplier is non-existent besides the min lvl required to play. The addition of a few guns to the smugglers buy menu will make him feel more useful an worthwhile to grind towards in line with the higher lvl required to become said class. These weapons could come from the dclass whitelisted guns (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17KidKRB9hy6EYaMmgHvVIhvReMHiUmshj9N-OAo0wAw/edit#gid=827801146) or from any guns which dclass can craft with the workbench in mines Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - making the crafting addon irrelevant, atleast more so than it already is. Who would this change mostly benefit? - Dclass The following list is a few weapons that come from the aforementioned whitelist and crafting menu that I would personally like to see added - rust_sawnoffshotgun, tfa_dbarrel, tfa_deagle, tfa_csgo_elite, and tfa_sten, tfa_mp40, or tfa_mp9.

I disagree with the sentiment here. It should be temp banned until the problem can be identified and fixed (seeing as its only speculation that the model causes this and no one knows the true reason) as that is the only way they can surely prevent anyone from crashing

neither - nor + support why me tho I was just giving all dclass guns also in defense of the others, you weren't just "taking their guns", you took all of them by spamming E on the stacks of them so they killed you