Jump to content

Sparkle

Member
  • Posts

    616
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Sparkle

  1. -Support

    The warn is inherently correct because you went out and about that anyone seeing you wouldn't think you are OOC. You said yourself that you had no intention to RP, just to hang out. Great, but you have to do so the right way. If you are going to do like you claimed you were doing, stick to areas that are considered OOC and hang out there. Lower D-Block, spawn areas, etc. Get everyone you want to hang with into a position where they won't get roped into RP by just being there. Teamspeak is also a way to stay connected. Consequently, you are admitting to the warn being correct in theory.

    • Like 1
  2. This would need log confirmation of intentional disconnect or crash. Not as cut and dry as it seems. This is relatively minor versus an LTAP.

    -Support for the ban completely.

    Will keep a -Support for the warn until evidence supports otherwise.

    • Like 1
  3. -Support

    Regardless of if it is against someone or not, anything offensive is still zero tolerance.

    Direct from the rules:

    "Gaminglight does not tolerate bullying or targeting based on race, gender, sexuality, or other identities, nor racial slurs or anything that can be deemed offensive. Gaminglight has a zero-tolerance policy towards this type of conduct."

    You still have not converted your post to the format after multiple replies which shows no care.

  4. 9 minutes ago, Some Weeb said:

    What do you propose the punishment would be? Warning someone over saying "UwU eats white candy in mouth [CYANIDE]". 

    Yeah no thanks I already got a strike for saying UwU before I dont need people getting on my ass about using it in an advert. 

    Max punishment would be invalidation of the advert. I wouldn't give warns or strikes for this. What you have there is okay. What's in the CI advert screenshot in the OP I would not consider valid. Again, you guys can keep your stuff just actually have the info in the advert proper. Not only in brackets.

    • Like 2
  5. +Support

    I will not go into the verbal/formal debate. It has been said time and time again its discretionary. No point bringing this up unless for a player report.

    However, I am inclined to agree on this appeal on the basis of interference of site operations. Namely during a surgery. This is an imminent threat to the other personnel in the immediate area. 076 getting enraged means everyone in the room could die. This is not the same as engaging a D Class or CI where the threat is only "potential". Wouldn't you commit to the same actions to protect your own against near certain death? I would not expect my equines to just take death on the just because.

    Context is everything and should be understood before making a decision. You can't always go "by the book" when the book is leading to your death.

    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
  6. Did some digging, this was the reason for his ban

    nqLIEEa.png

    While it doesn't match the ID listed here on the report, the listed Discord name and ID matches to this

    You were technically banned for "Nazi Sympathizer".

  7. 2 hours ago, Starstep said:

    That doesn't change the fact that you still took your own sit, which is a big no-no for staff members.

    I'll +Support this appeal. However, in the future, I'd recommend just calling staff to move them out of the way.

     

  8. Both sides are in the wrong. The HSU for not giving you time to explain. You for resorting straight to death. You didn't want to put yourself in the crossroad of RDM or FailRP but that could be easily resolved through a staff call. Let the cuffing happen and things would still be in your favor. Verbal versus Formal is staff discretion if I remember correctly.

    I'll pass you the +Support but that was extremely poor decision making. 

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...