Jump to content

Retrieving Dino DNA


Recommended Posts

                     Clearance Level: 2

     Rank Required Too View This Document

                           Researcher 

 Anyone Who Has Had This Document Placed In Thier Hands Without Proper Clearance Stop Reading Now You Have Been Warned

                        Class: Euclid.                                      

                           SCP:1265.                                        

              Reshearcher In Charge: McMac

            Rank of Reshearcher: Reshearcher

                    Participants: Jimmy, Versa, 

Goal: Too extract DNA from 1265-A and find his links too fossils

                        Test Summary:

Test began with placing the D Class-1 in a dinosaur costume. The D Class was then giving a syringe too extract dna from 1265-A and placed in the cell with 1265-A. The test started smoothly at first begining with a call emitted from the d class similiar too the ones 1265-A uses, but the test then took a turn. SCP-1265-A began sniffing the D Class which was not accounted for and led too the d class being killed. With the first attempt fail D Class-2 was suited with a similiar costume but his time was sprayed with a pheromone perfume. With preparations concluded D Class-2 was placed in the containment cell with 1265-A where things went smoothly. The test took a turn when the D class attempted too extract the dna and was then killed by 1265-A. On conclusion that using a D class was too risky Researcher McMac sent a drone into the containment cell with 1265-A. The drone being controlled by Reshearcher McMac successfully extracted the DNA but upon exfilling took damage from 1265-A running over it. With what remained of the blood Researcher McMac returned too his lab and ran it under a DNA Analysis Machine. The results came out very similar too prehistoric fossils but slightly changed formation on the way the DNA was formed.

                            Conclusion:

SCP-1265-A might've at some point been turned from a prehistoric raptor too what it is today. Relation of how this process was done is currently unknown but further testing may reveal more information. When this was done is unknown and wether 1265-A was turned into a SCP from a fossil or from a live specimen is unknown. Conclusiong further tested needed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Research section is only for Applications, resignations and whatnot. Please go to research test logs for grading to be assigned.

 FORMER:  Foundation Doctor , RFA SIC/OA1 , SEC SFC, WD-V Eqvites Antonius MONK CI DHLS , CI SM , RRH Analyst , D5 MSGT , Maintenance ME
 "Domz" 
image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moved to correct forum

Maintenance > other branches

Retired Head of Maintenance and Engineering

Former D5 2LT | Formerly RRH Logistics "OL-13" | Former Alpha-1 Captain 'Antarctica' Vulcan Award Winner |

Former Senior Admin/Forum Diplomat, Former Event Team Member

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Grade: 45/100

Lore: 20/25

The test is decently realistic, and the test logs helps explain the details of the experiment pretty well. The conclusion is properly used and gives room for future testing, which is a massive benefit in any type of document.

Format: 10/25

Uses the basic enforced research format, but not a lot of creative use. If you are not creating a formal document, you can use the features the forums provide to make your logs more appealing and possibly easy to understand.

Presentation: 10/25

A decent attempt was made, but the professionalism of the log could use work. A good way to do this is by looking at official SCP documents from the wiki, or looking at other works by more proficient researchers. You can understand and inherit some of their habits.

Writing: 5/25

Many spelling and grammar mistakes that tend to take away the effect of the research log. 

Notes: 

A lot of these issues can be easily solved by proof-reading your documents. It may not seem like it but you tend to notice more mistakes when you actually go back and read your work in full. With more practice, and proof-reading to erase silly mistakes, you may find great success in your future research documents.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...