Jump to content

Parkland27

Member
  • Posts

    30
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Parkland27

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Parkland27's Achievements

Explorer

Explorer (4/14)

  • Dedicated
  • Collaborator
  • First Post
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

1

Reputation

  1. -support No Trainings on record (you were just Trained, just try if you can) No activity logs (only mentioned in a few activity logs) Plentiful of documents (in order of oldest to newest of 1/12/21 Scp 1025 - 294 1/4 Scp 294 - 173 3/4 Scp 096 - 294 4/4 Scp 049 - 4/4 Scp 999 - 0/4 Scp 049 - 2/4 Scp 049 - 008 2/4 Scp 5208 - 1/4 Scp 079 - 2/4 Scp 5208 - 1048 3/4 5208 juice - 1/4 2191 blood type - 2/4 2191 interview - 2/4 Overall from my POV, very short documents, somewhat creative, somewhat repetitive, the fonts, I don't know what that is to be honest Only about 20 days in research, I'm not going to count the old parts, as reasons for why he was retrained unknown, trained on 12/23/21. It really does help when you familiarize yourself in the branch Removed from CI for inactivity of 1/6/21, recorded on punishments Active unknown Behavior unknown Reason for -support, no activity logs, random disappears from research, especially being trained 3 different times, inactive from CI may prove differently if you are right or wrong for command. And as well for documents, shorter than me, everything else I've creative and Grammer is fine
  2. its mainly my fault on the LTAP, thought maybe he already knew what it was due to a warn in 9/2018, 2nd its really hard to tell if he was LTAPing, or NITRP LTARP, just 'n-word' then leaves. but then again, i wasnt aware LTARP was a thing until now, but then again, how would i know, he hadnt even contacted me which could of helped remove the LTAP and not place something else, but then again, he wasnt in a sit so its my fault.
  3. your not wrong, you werent in a sit, but some may see it as a LTAP since you were told to stop and all this other stuff or blah blah. all im saying, its my take, and your past warns was the reason what you received a LTAP on my side, if they would like to change it, its fine, and if i fucked up, its my fault.
  4. but the only main reason why i warned you for LTAP was your past warns, you have LTAPed before.
  5. i dont mind whoever likes to change it, my apologies, i wasnt aware enough that LTARP was a thing so its my fault, but the racism is aparent
  6. i could be wrong, but when i heard it the first and 2nd time i heard the N word, but rn i currently cannot hear it due to airpod shit
  7. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LNmopTiJ15XhsRYEP8bHdyllSST7cyGBKqqtonJSEYc/edit?usp=sharing and my present to you! for christmas! is my application! was it a good gift?
  8. -support (due to the audio not clearly stating what you said) -hockey was 035 -bigmarsh was a class d -you were 8286 1# scps arent not allowed to kill each other 2# 035 is allowed to attack those in armory, and is allowed in as well Summary: without the audio its hard to tell what you were saying which could have shifted this more towards a warning either way if he was aware you were a scp. If this were my sit, and i didnt hear the audio, and i wasnt able to hear you saying that you were a scp, it would be more of a verbal (mostly a verbal) its due to this (WITHOUT AUDIO No way of knowing you were a scp if you did or didnt say something unless you changed forms or told him) Now if there was audio and he heard you, it could go two ways, half and half, A) some are aware of what they did and do it on purpose, B) while some are not paying attention and this stuff can happen For A) obvious warning For B) most likely a verbal, (if past warns with the same issue, highly a warn) So my punishmsnt to him would depend. If A is correct then a warn If B is correct without past warns with the same issue, it will be a verbal.
  9. I can confirm this, he just caused a lot of issue. Just please work on your behavior and focusing on the community man, if one person can do it, then you can.
  10. +support I have spent enough time around this guy to say yes Active man took all of ET sits for the entire week... are we sure john wick aint coming yet? R.I.P Lisa, she smelt Ass Gas
  11. +support -your active -seen you around and your a nice guy -wouldnt mind him in command
  12. +/-support From what im hearing you fucked up? Ive heard it was a joke you did or some shit, but i like to hear your side. Even if you fucked up, we will have to come to a point to move on, we either start doing that now, or it wont ever happen. I have seen this happened in a very prominent staff member, instead of being even more trouble, he turned his life around and did good, please do the same, i look for the positives and motive to change. -i will not quote your activity as i am not on during EU hours -application sounds generous -3 months 5 months 7 months, he has been here awhile, and i believe having a EU apart of the command, it can benefit the night time for those in low pop hours. -come find me, so i can learn more about you, this would be your usually idk you type thing, but let me discover who you really are as a player of the community, usually on around 630 pm est, and 2 am est (the later it is the likely hood you will not see me on)
  13. I had to stop taking things seriously, because that caused major issues in security, research, and before i was in staff and learned to not be too serious, but thank you for letting me know, i will keep a look out and ask others around me and for the only active, i do plan on staying on, but you do have to understand, family, little brothers, and school. thank you for the reply
×
×
  • Create New...