wolphin

Aight, my bad @Zero X. Looks like you have changed. Imma take back this report. No formal warn/ban was handed from what I know. He never said anything else about the situation after I told him, so I was going of the premise that nothing ever came out of it.

Your in game name: TwizKury Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:511677233 The player's in game name: SX Associate Zero The player's steam ID (required): STEAM_0:0:13606971 Date and Time This Incident Occurred: May 27, 2020 What did the player do: Said the nword. And before you ask, yes this did happen a few months ago. I'm only re-reporting this because recently i realized he wasn't banned/given a warning or any form of punishment (even though I told Hotshot about the situation, and gave evidence). Evidence (required): What do you believe should happen to the player: Personally, IDC what happens to him, but ig a ban? Not exactly sure the punishment that should be given. Any extra information: Yes, IK that this happened 5 months ago, but i decided to make a formal report after my other one wasn't dealt with, so apologies if it's too late to do anything. Also, timestamp is 3:49

im trying to find the steamid rn, i just dont know his profile name. 1. thank you for not immediately -supporting the post because the video was 5 months old 2. they didn't issue a formal warning/ban (from what I saw), he just said "it'll be dealt with" and did something else

Your in game name: TwizKury Your Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:511677233 The player's in game name: SX Associate Zero The player's steam ID (required): currently looking for it Date and Time This Incident Occurred: May 27, 2020 What did the player do: Said the nword. And before you ask, yes this did happen a few months ago. I'm only re-reporting this because recently i realized he wasn't banned/given a warning or any form of punishment (even though I told Hotshot about the situation, and gave evidence). Evidence (required): What do you believe should happen to the player: Personally, IDC what happens to him, but ig a ban? Not exactly sure the punishment that should be given. Any extra information: Yes, IK that this happened 5 months ago, but i decided to make a formal report after my other one wasn't dealt with, so apologies if it's too late to do anything

+support i dont fucking understand why the taxi driver job is paid anyways when it's this busted. before hiding something behind a paywall, at least make the product PLAYABLE.

+support I think this would be a great idea. Maybe make it so theres a curfew during night time? idk, just a theory.

still, i made this suggestion so i could make a few changes/additions from the og suggestion.

What are you suggesting? - To bring back ID Checkpoints. Hear me out. Make it so every one who wants to come/exit to HCZ have to have their ID's checked. If it's not a sleuth, this is how the conversation should go: Boarder Officer: Hello, may I see ID? SCP Staff: Sure. (does /me gives id) Boarder Officer: (does /me puts id into id reader) Boarder Officer: (does /me gives ID back) SCP Staff: Thanks! If it IS a sleuth, this is the ideal situation: Boarder Officer: May I see ID? Sleuth: Sure. (gives id, rolls)* Boarder Officer: Alright, let me confirm this with the rest of staff (secretly calls out on foundation comms) Them, security comes and detains the sleuth. *Sleuth must roll higher than 40 to enter HCZ without a valid ID. How would this change better the server? - It adds realism, as i imagine the foundation doing something like this. It also makes sleuth's job a tad harder, making their job not-so-easy. To add on to that, it'll help Security with their jobs of keeping CI out. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - None, to my knowledge at least. Who would this change mostly benefit? - Security, SCP Staff in general. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - N/A

i did?? im kind of confused.

MAJOR +support this dude on research is fucking amazing. he's responsible, extremely friendly, and IMO would make a great staff. The only "issue" I guess is activeness on forums, and the entire warn thing. but otherwise, definetely deserves Tmod!

What are you suggesting? - For there to be a sign in D-block showing how to be trained for a branch. That sentence makes little to no sense, so here's what I mean in depth. So, in d-block, near the elevator, put a poster up that says "Welcome to SCP-RP! To get trained for (branch), follow these steps" 1. Press F4, go to (branch), and go to (branch) trainee. 2. Follow the steps provided in (branch) training room 3. Wait for a trainer to come along and train you" How would this change better the server? - So people won't have to be paying attention for an advert to be trained. As a research trainer, it's extremely frustrating to have to advert, wait 2 minutes, and advert again, so adding the poster will make the entire training process much easier. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. - Nope. It's not a major change, so it shouldn't be hard to implement. Who would this change mostly benefit? - Newer players and trainers. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - Currently making a poster, will post in comments once completed.

+support Even with numbers, d-class are generally weak. Security only really lose d-block depending on the number of security and whether or not security has good coordination skills. IMO D-Class should have a role like this. Im surprised it's not in the game actually.

You know what, fuck it. You can shoot bigfoot in most scenarios you want. There.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oSd5s6NzXKKr4mpOzXHki3JPT5-zi78W731qfnwjwLM/edit?usp=sharing

could you be more specific??

that makes no sense. technically, if you fire at him, it's RDM. he's not harming you, and he's not doing anything that puts your allies in danger. being given the right to kill him whenever you feel like it is unfair for bigfoot.

ik, but i'm trying to say that might be a problem with monkey guarding spawn. what work specifically?

scp spawns and human spawns are 2 different things. idk how ci does tests, since i've only ever been in the military, but idk.

mmm, alright. So i guess a new rule is that CI can capture 1000. i feel like the "mingy" argument is extremely weak. every SCP can be minged on. there are no exceptions to this. the climb swep isn't useless, as you can climb buildings and avoid fire. mmk, fists work too i guess. he can't its failrp if he does since it's a spawn

What are you suggesting? - For SCP 1000 to be added How would this change better the server? - I'll just put my previous points in, and i'll add some rules to him. -There is no threat on the surface (SCP wise), so adding in SCP 1000 could make the surface more dangerous to be in the open. Plus, SCP 1000 is Bigfoot, so the surface is perfect for him. -It'll add more realism, and will make patrols more interesting. Description of him: SCP 100 also known as Bigfoot, is a theorized "american folklore" tale. He hunts solo, and he kills those who are alone. Some things about him: His SWEP does 50DMG every front hit, 100DMG for back hits His Climbing Swep can be used to climb up buildings, and other structures His base running speed is 130% Rules he must follow: - He can only attack if a) 2 or more people are pointing guns at him b) someone is firing at him c) the person being attacked is visibly alone d) someone is taking pictures of him - Rules others must follow: You may not fire at Bigfoot unless: a) threatening you (yelling/ making monke noises) b) running towards you with his swep in-hand c) is nearby you* *if he's on the other side of the map, or if he's running away from you theres no good reason to shoot them.* Extra things: He can be tranquilized (for the following firing reasons) and be brought into the site for testing. Are there any disadvantages of making this change to the server? If so, explain. -It could add on to lag, but that'd be true for literally any other addon.-As stated in the older post, it could potentially interrupt patrol routes. Who would this change mostly benefit? - SCP players who want a unique experience. Please link any workshop content, screenshots, or anything that you think may be helpful to those who view this suggestion - Bigfoot: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=960722145 Swep: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=935300356 (should have the damage modded) Climbing SWEP: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=113495466

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nepDmkQEx08N3Yy8b5EzJSvHEB4SFwfIGS4EYkjzZyQ/edit?usp=sharing

+support

-support didn't give me a chickn samwich jkjk MAJOR +support -extremely friendly - Isn't mingy - gives great feedback - overall a leader in the research branch

I attempted to kill the d-class that shot me, but then every single other one got in the way, and then proceeded to fire at me. and they ran into bunks after i died the first time, and thats when i started to kill them. and i'm not going to close the door because if I do, the d-class would have been stuck inside bunks?? i didn't exit bunks, as i said i was inside of bunks the entire time. and I switched jobs before the d-class came inside, so i dont see the argument there. and how does that count as metagame? i'm not "gaining" any form of rp knowledge, so how is that metagame? and i was laughing at the dclass because they were all just rushing in trying to kill me, so i mean