Castalex

Member
  • Content Count

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Castalex

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Name: Alex Cast Rank: LCPL Why should you retain your rank (WO+ must respond | 150+ words):N/A Any Notes, Questions, or Concerns?: None.
  2. Lore Name: Dr. Alex Cast Steam ID: STEAM_1:1:18043156 Rank: Researcher Activity Level: Active at MET
  3. Thank you very much for the correction. To be honest i need the list, when i began research i didn't even knew that you could test on the non-Playable SCPs, because noone told me so, and i thought maybe i release the list for the fellow newbies since 50% of the requested tests don't even need to be requested. And sometimes i need to lookup quick which SCP is capable of what, so my tests dont get TOO "unrealistic". Like switching monitor for a second, press CTRL+F, looking for 682, click on the link, read a bit and it's done. But thank you for expressing your opinion. List has been updated. Research Assistant Manager got deleted on SCP 682 and every LCZ SCP (no matter the SCP-Wiki-Classification) got moved to the JR section.
  4. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jTT7aLfOG0FiQBZpVeB98OxKuQTGvgVJde-h-sfsQPY/edit?usp=sharing I created this list according to the SOP, if anybody of the higher ups recognizes some errors, please notify me and i will change it accordingly, because sometimes the SOP wasn't 100% clear, for example 457 is in LCZ, but is a Euclid/Potential Keter and the SOP states: Associate Researchers can test on any LCZ SCPs (457 is located next to the gas-chamber-room and thus in LCZ), also counting for 527 which is roaming in LCZ so does he also count, since he has no own containment chamber?
  5. The composition (babies and metal) were referring to the replica - 1048 b and c AND a are a replica of 1048, only for clearing things up, i wasn't referring to 1048 or 1048 A specifically. So are test-logs that try to gather information about "useless" information less valid than ones that don't? Only wanting to know, so i can concentrate on more "important" ones. So in the "Background Research:" I do write my own text, but with the information that can be find in the wiki right? Bit unclear how i should approach it. Thank you for your vote and i will try to improve my next test!
  6. Thank you for the grade , changed the Keter to Euclid. Yeah about the grammar and spelling i'm from germany so sometimes the language barrier gets into the way, but thank you for notifiying it, i will try to improve on it.
  7. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bjSI1H2JkwToJa9xhfALAy5PZ_jmUGFj8w1YYREHHII/edit?usp=sharing
  8. https://docs.google.com/document/d/19_Uz9FJ6cYnAg3bjJrwkB13NAmahtlMDjJV7Jkl_zJ0/edit?usp=sharing
  9. Thank you very much, ill try to do better with my SCP-096 Test.
  10. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1klzkKTZRzQtB1J0jqr86w_aIFK2_OD9DSy6WTjZUGP4/edit
  11. Thank you very much! Appreciate the criticism! One question though how do i get a promotion? It's quite hard doing testing on Safe-SCPs because everybody plays the Keter ones, also when i'm online i rarely find researchers of a higher grade then me so i can't assist
  12. Thank you for showing me, the language barrier is quite big, i will try it better next time.