Tree

Score: 90/100 Good Job! Creativity 25/25 - I haven't been able to find a similar test to this one, the idea is unique. this was also creatively designed, utilizing slides and implementing some RP for the reader in your documents is always appreciated. Presentation 22/25 - This doc was pretty good as far as the presentation goes, It was easy to understand and I never got confused while reading. There is one thing, however, I would like to see a photo/video of the actual event in-game, it adds some authenticity to your document and it's always cooler to know that the event your reading about actually (or at least somewhat) happened in-game. Typography 25/25 - Not much I can say here. This document has consistent formatting and design (besides the front slide but it looks good and doesn't feel out of place). The formatting used makes it easier to read and understand the document. Overall, good formatting/typography. Writing 18/25 - I feel like this document isn't living up to the full potential of its idea, and the reason is writing. I feel that, although this is a simple test, the document is a bit short. I feel that you could have been more descriptive of what was going on during the test, and what exactly happened to the D-Class when affected by 012? something more than "D-CLASS WALKS IN AND STARTS GETTING AFFECTED BY SCP-012’S ABILITIES, AND EVENTUALLY DIES" would be nice. I am not the best at grammar myself but I couldn't manage to spot any errors in this document, so full points there. Also here is a tip, another thing I (and other command members) love is when researchers create hypotheses in their conclusion because typically by the end of a test there are more questions than answers, and this test is no exception.

Tried to format this like the official SCP wiki. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EWBPbzO1XIfksFxWgC6gE7pJ0yCOorxXXCeJFmwCgrI/edit?usp=sharing

+support Good member of research but more activity and more documents would be great to see.

Name: Oak T Ree SteamID: STEAM_0:1:185794253 Current Rank: EXCR (Executive Researcher) Time in Research (Estimate): 5-6 weeks i believe Why do you believe you should be in Research Command?(100 word requirement): I think I should be in research command because I love the branch and the people in the branch more, and I want to see everything related to research thrive. I think one of the best ways for me to improve the branch in any way I can is to become a command members. I also love making people excited about research and research activites, however this would be much easier to do if I had more means to do so. Another reason I think I should be a command members is that there are some things in research that can use some improvement, and the best way to change things is to be in a position to do so. (also Sixx DMd me on discord to apply lol) What can you bring to the table that others can't? (100 word requirement): Im already in a leadership position as a professor in RRA (Ignoring HCMD, Im 2nd in command of FTO branch). Im happy to help others, some examples being all the people I have helped with documents (Hanz, Kraiy & cduke08). Im well versed in the ways of the server, I have been in Omi-9, Gensec, and research, as well as playing a lot of D-class, from all this i have ammased over 3 weeks of playtime (Most of which isnt AFK time). I would describe myself as honest, encouraging, optimistic, integrous, and an overall good leader. I would like to think im more than competent for the rank. What would you do to better Research and increase activity? (100 word requirement): Something Im currently in the process of is looking into ways to improve recruitment for research. The main thing im working on right now is trying to find a way to make new researchers better understand how to perform test. One way I plan to do this is to Host an event that involves RRA members giving the option of being guided through a test to newly recruited JRs (after training is completed) and show them how to make an activity log/document from said test. Once i see proof of the RRA member helping (preferably video) then i would reward them with a potential promotion and in game cash. I would also be tracking the people that had recieved guidance on testing and see if it had an impact on their performance when compared to other newly trained JRs that didnt recieve the extra help. If I can proove a significant enough improvement then I think it would be smart to implement it into the training process somehow. There are of course other ideas I have to better research and increase activity but for the sake of brevity Ill leave it here. Thanks for Reading!

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ebpfMf1LbSp0Y2Ot4gqtPChWLbFiqOTmUgNcZUB7SHI/edit?usp=sharing

THIS IS NOT AN OFFICIAL REVIEW/GRADE (I am incapable of formally grading documents) This is a pretty cool test and I love to see researchers working together! However i think some constructive criticism, especially on first time documents (like this one), can really help out the reseachers behind the test. Formatting/Aesthetic: Because I was the one to do the formatting it would be completely biased for me to give my opinion on this. (--/25) Grammar: I didnt notice many grammar mistakes, but there were small things like "To my and my colleague's surprise" that show it may have not been read over as much as it should have been. (I also not the best at grammar so its possible i missed other mistakes) (23/25) Writing: This is an area that I think could use a bit of work. Firstly the "Background Research" portion of this document is quite lacking. You simply explained your method of researching the SCP whereas we want to know what you learned while researching and how it can be applied to the upcoming test. Think of the "Background Research" portion as essentially your context behind your hypothesis. The overall quality of writing could also be improved, I feel the document would be much better with more descriptive writing and better choice of words/phrases at certain points. I reccomend you read over your future documents and consider changes that could simplify interpretation of your text or improve the reader's experience. (15/25) Test: SCP-049 (and 049-2) are very commonly tested SCPs, likely even the most, and the idea for this test in particular isnt the most unique or exciting. Combined with the fact that you werent supposed to be testing on this SCP and im going to have to give you a reduced score in my book. However, I will acknowledge the lack of testing options for Junior Reseachers and because this is your first Doc (and test in general) I will be leniant with how hard I am on you with this one. (20/25) UNOFFICIAL SCORE: 58/(75) (without formatting considered) Not bad for your first document!

https://docs.google.com/document/d/11bdL5D5ZXtp0T3nSKkmVHF0GHxZYZBghb2Fzhsll4_Y/edit?usp=sharing

connecting via ip address in console worked thanks

for about a week now ive been having an issue with specifically gaming light servers, they dont appear on the server lists and on the legacy browser they show up as "server not responding" although i know the servers are up, ive reinstalled, checked integrity, messed with my addons, i have good internet speeds, i reset my router and still nothing helps, there was another post made about either this issue or a similar problem but i think multiple people are being effected by this. plz halp

im having a similar issue, i can connect to all server but gaming light servers and when i go into legacy browser and find the servers ip it just says the server isnt responding, my wifi is good (50 mbps download, 20 mbps upload) but i still cant find any gaming light servers. Last time i joined a gaminglight server was a few weeks ago and it went perfectly fine.

could it be possible to look far back in logs to see who went on the 106 job and got demoted around 4AM EST?

+ Support One -/+ Support Two Although i dont think SCPs should go into spawns, or into D-Block, I do think that it should be against the rules to run back into one of these safe zones such as the LCZ Tesla Hallway going into D-Block because then the SCP is powerless in that situation, I also think that no one should be able to shoot from this hallway to try to kill/harm an SCP.

i wonder what would happen if i made this a real suggestion... hmmmmmmm

+ Support The "puppy guarding" rule has been abused by this multiple times, adding a rule stating "as someone cannot shoot you when you leave your spawn, you cannot shoot them (GENSEC excluded)" would be nice to see IMO