Piller

Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.

Denied. The SCP-RP SMT has decided against adding this suggestion for performance reasons, the benefit to the server, or another unstated reason.

Due to the exceedingly high (practically inevitable) chance that this will lead to large amounts of power game issues, failRP, and be just overall an undue burden on the staff team, we will have to deny this. However, I want to say that conceptually this is a very cool idea, but just not something that should be governed by roll actions.

Accepted Thank you for the report. Appropriate action against the player and or staff member will be taken to ensure that they receive the correct punishment.

There's really not much for me to say here; not everyone enjoys the "RHO RP". What you did was failrp/RDM, so he does have a right to report you, especially if it's interfering with MTF's business. You will be receiving a formal warn for this.

Denied

Okay so a couple things about this. Firstly, please don't add a poll to reports as that's not how they're decided. Secondly, he waited 7 seconds from the initial attack and stopped healing when he was fired upon again. He also clearly didn't know you were pursuing him because you were cloaked. Laki did the best he could to satisfy the combat healing rules given the situation.

@Rex Velvet@proximo stop arguing on this. It doesn't help SMT decide anything when you bicker back and forth. Next time you'll receive warns on your forums accounts.

New HPs: SCP 682 from 7500 to 9000 HP SCP 2191 from 600 to 750 HP SCP 939 from 3500 to 5000 HP SCP 076 from 3500 to 5000 HP SCP 049-2 from 650 to 1000 HP SCP 1048 from 600 to 950 HP SCP 1048-A from 175 to 350 HP SCP 098 from 600 to 950 HP SCP 5208-GL from 300 to 500 HP 100 AP to 200 AP SCP 354-4 from 4000 to 5500 HP

1/23/22 - Update Log General Changes New Ghost Ban system. Buffed some SCPs. Added Nexus-3 to the server. Increased scope accuracy of the Khvostov. Buffed damage of the browning auto. Fixed Zeta-9 crash issue. Improved server performance.

Denied

You sure about that?

Denied

Given that he didn't say that directly on the forums, or any of our other platforms, no game punishment will be issued. However, given that he did put it in a title and use that to make a report, thus indirectly saying it on the forums, a warning will be issued for the forums.

Denied

Denied

So first off, you got to 2/3. Secondly, your adverts not only fail to follow guidelines, but are completely unproductive. Pablo simply teleported you back to your CC, which was in reality a kindness. Follow the advert guidelines going forward.

DENIED

You can only appeal bans and job blacklists here. If you'd like to discuss this with CI, then please reach out to a Delta (low) command member.

Wish you the best of luck! Thanks for all the work and love you put into D-5. Dang and I was just saying how perfect of a HCMD team D-5 had lol.

Denied

Firstly, please use proper grammar with appeals, this is just a giant run on sentence that makes it difficult to read. Secondly, you've provided no evidence that this is false and your record indicates that the staff member was justified in their decision. Also, 3 ERP warns in less than 24 hours? To be totally honest, you're lucky you haven't been banned yet.

Demoted to D-Class. @Hale?it was good knowing you!

Denied

It is unnecessary for you to argue on your appeal. That alone is grounds for a denial or even further action. Now to the warn itself. ARDM and RDM are in the same category, so even if he is wrong, changing it is out of the question. It's also staff discretion to give either a formal or a verbal warning. There's really no grounds to rescind this. A single warning does nothing, it's just that, a warning to stop that action. The best thing to do is to use it as a learning experience. Not everyone has the same sense of humor. Letting it ruin your day does nothing but waste your own time.