049x999 Test log - requesting RFA grading

[Lord Stolas]

Just don't view this in mobile, mobile really messes up the formating XD

https://docs.google.com/document/d/123p3YJnG7-q6KqPrC0BsJSz2B2sw9tiFaH42-WOdxnM/edit?usp=sharing

Edited August 31, 2022 by Lord Stolas

[Domz]

Total Score: 7.4/10

Format: 1.9/2.5 An exceptionally creative format! I love when people work together to get formats from some of their fellow Researchers-- Teamwork makes the dream work. Also, the inclusion of your actual test logs assist with immersion in the world the document presents. The issue I have with this though is that the entirety of the test and other parts of the document appears compressed and chunky,  it would be preferable if you simply took some time to space out the sentences. 

Lore: 2.5/2.5 You show an in-depth understanding of the lore surrounding the anomalies you are testing on. I especially appreciate the way you present this information; short, sweet, and to the point. Your inclusion of an addendum describing an unfortunate incident which occurred after the test brings this document more closely in line with one you would see on the forums, and creates a sense of greater intrigue surrounding your test. 

Test Idea/Execution: 2.5/2.5 This test stands out in that it is performed on a trio of anomalies, all of which are filed into the same document. You show an exceptionally high level of effort in your work, not willing to cut corners in order to finish your document sooner. I'm deeply appreciative of the security measures detailed in all of your test logs. 

Grammar/Spelling: 0.5/2.5 An unfortunate turn compared to your other aforementioned scores. There are some spelling mistakes, such as ‘SCP’ being misspelled, and frequent examples of incorrect grammar and punctuation. It is important that a document is easy to understand upon first reading, and poor grammar/punctuation can impede that.

Notes: Please do not take any of this to offence this is this a more nit-picked version of grading.