Jump to content

Capture Point Rule Clarification - Accepted - In Progress - Completed


The_Kman

Recommended Posts

What you want to see? - Clarification on the capture points rules as to if Party A is capturing a point owned by another family, Party B may not intervene as in theory, they would be "defending" the point, however, the point was not theirs. If Party B wishes to capture the point they must wait until Party A is done capturing it. 

Why should we add it? - Clarification

What are the advantages of having this? - Less confusion on the capture point rules as to when someone can attack (if this suggestion is denied, please address the issue as to when parties may attack i.e. "They may attack whenever, etc."). 

Who is it mainly for? - Players

Links to any content - https://streamable.com/6xttyu

Context: UMC was capturing a point owned by a different family. BWA began attacking the point to capture it.

PD MSGT Retried FBI Assistant Director The Operator $100 Donator Gang UMC

"Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if you want to add this rule where the person must capture the point im going to  -support this would  Nerf flags  If You Are In That Zone Capturing a point  any one should be able to kill you if they are in a faction or gang  also this would Just Make It easier For An Other Party To Get Flags And People Can Just Abuse It By Capturing It And Leaving While No One Can Do Anything just bring a squad with you or be ready for a fight 

 

febc990adfc212b4762e1f932a6f635d.png.88381d2558bf63a88f91fe11780d5b04.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...